CHANNEL IMBALANCE in your Volume Pot - Some Thoughts - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st December 2010, 04:53 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Practical Devices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North America
Lightbulb CHANNEL IMBALANCE in your Volume Pot - Some Thoughts

Channel Imbalance in your Volume Pot - Some Thoughts

Note: this article can also be downloaded as a pdf (with higher picture resolution) from our website: Practical Devices Corporation


The volume pot is a fairly critical component of any audio amp; since we deal with pots by the bucketful, I thought I'd share a few tidbits of insight with the diy community. Please don't view the following as shilling for our amps; we here at Practical Devices have received alot from the online community and members here, and I'm just giving a little back. Hopefully this will be particularly helpful to the DIY'ers, or those hard-core breed of folks who roll their own pots in their commercially-bought amps.

I'm only dealing with analog pots here, not digital pots, nor stepped-resistor pots.

I'll assume you know the pot basics - a pot consists of a “wiper”, which scrapes against a resistive track as you turn the knob. For those who need all the pot info they can get, check out the useful wiki article: Potentiometer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Click the image to open in full size.
Pictured above is a typical 9mm pot, shown in its natural habitat inside the XM5 headphone amp. The 9mm refers to the pot's body size. It is a mechanical “dual-ganged” pot, consisting of two isolated sets of wipers, which scrape against two isolated sets of tracks of resistive material. “Dual-gang” means the pot consists of two separate potentiometers (one for the left audio channel, one for right) which share the same shaft


Click the image to open in full size.

Above is the pot broken apart. Note there are two separate channels (one for left, one for right). Also very interesting: note that each channel has TWO wipers for redundancy (it's a little hard to see in the picture, as I've accidentally bent the two wipers so they are touching each other). This helps reduce any crackle or dropout when moving the pot, since at any time, at least one of the wipers should be in contact with the resistive track.

Also, from the above picture, it is obvious that any dust getting into works would be very bad. Dust will get in between the wiper and the resistive track, and will lift the wiper off the track, losing electrical contact. Fortunately, these pots are fairly well-sealed, so it has never been an issue.

What makes a lousy pot lousy? I won't delve into the obvious: flimsy construction, crackling/cutout, open to dust, a wobbly shaft, etc. For us, the biggest problem is channel imbalance (aka channel mismatch); I find it fairly irksome to slap on a set of headphones and hear one ear louder than the other, my degree of irkedness being directly proportional to decibels of imbalance. The usual culprit is the volume pot. ALLanalog pots, without exception, suffer from some degree of imbalance. Being mechanical devices, it can't be avoided. So the goal for us is to minimize the imbalance.


The difficulty for us, as amp designers/manufacturers, is getting pots with good channel matching which are small enough to fit in our portable amps. There are two things causing imbalance here:

  1. Due to mechanical tolerance (slop), the left channel wiper will never be exactly in the same position as the right wiper, and,
  2. Even if the two wipers were exactly in the same position along their respective resistive tracks, the tracks themselves won't exactly match each other - the two tracks will not be attached to the body of the pot in exactly the same place, and the composition of the two tracks (ie. percent carbon content, which give the tracks their resistivity) will be slightly different. And finally, for a pot with an “audio taper”, the resistivity of the track itself (ie. “ohms per millimeter”) has to vary with position - very very difficult for the pot maker to match.

Size does matter here, since for a given mechanical and resistivity tolerance, a pot with a longer resistive track will have proportionally better matching than that with a shorter resistive track (and a longer track means a physically bigger pot). Thus the problem with physically small pots.

So, what to do?
We've resorted to testing our pots, before they get installed into our products. The good ones get installed, the bad ones thrown out. Since we do it on a semi-industrial scale, we have a test jig and ultra-cool software to speed things up. Here's an example of a good pot vs. a bad pot (both pots were from the same batch).

Click the image to open in full size.


Click the image to open in full size.

The Y-axis is dB of channel imbalance. The X-axis is (a non-linear representation of) percent rotation of the pot shaft. The left side of the graph is with the shaft at 0% rotation, and the right is 100%.

The green line represents the left channel, and the red is the right. The distance between the red line and the green line is how many dB of channel imbalance exist (graph is 1.0 dB/division. Ignore the noise on the far left side of the graph - this is an artifact of the low-res and noisy ADC on our duct-tape-encrusted test equipment).

The “PASS” pot is nice and well-matched, with less than 0.3dB of channel imbalance. Pretty good.
The “FAIL” pot has, for a small portion of its rotation, a spike of about 2dB of imbalance. So if you are listening to music and happen to have the volume knob right at the spike, one ear will be 2dB louder than the other. Ugh.

These particular pots are spec'd at a tolerance of “±20%”, which is typical of 9mm pots. 20% is, of course, quite flimsy; even the “FAIL” pot above meets that. But a 2dB imbalance would be noticeably by most, so we chuck it into the garbage.


So, the take-home message for the DIY'ers installing your own analog pots: TEST THEM FIRST.

If your pot only costs $2 or $3, then consider buying 3, and use the best one. You don't need fancy test equipment like we have; simply use an ohmmeter to measure the resistance for various rotational positions, and if the left channel resistance is always within a couple of percent of the right, you're golden.

Comments and more thoughts welcome.

Regards,
James
------------------------------------------------------
Practical Devices Corporation
www.practicaldevices.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011, 05:31 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Germany
Thanks! Great work.

I wonder there's no resonance at all. It affects virtually every DIYer.

This is what drives me mad since I run my new amp. It has higher gain and thus I don't turn up the CD players volume knob that much anymore. Result is serious channel imbalance (up to 3dB). Obviously many commercial products, Sony in my case, suffer from this as well.

Now I know why many amps have a balance knob. I always wondered what it could be good for.
Mine hasn't because I started to hate potentiometers some time ago. But another crappy potentiometer could be a good cure for a crappy potentiometer...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2011, 05:55 PM   #3
AEIOU is offline AEIOU  United States
Account disabled at member's request
 
AEIOU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Send a message via AIM to AEIOU Send a message via MSN to AEIOU Send a message via Yahoo to AEIOU
I noticed a distinct channel imbalance in my system many years ago. Back then my system consisted of a NAD preamp and separate Kenwood monoblock amps. I finally narrowed the problem down to the volume pot in the preamp, mistracking between the the left and right channels. I ordered a replacement pot directly from NAD and it turned out to be even worse the original.

Since then I always check my pots. My little tube amp kit had a poor volume pot to begin with, but I bought several replacements and was finally able to narrow it down to an acceptable one.

A good reason to consider using precision stepped attenuators.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2011, 09:09 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Stormrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Connecticut
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via AIM to Stormrider Send a message via MSN to Stormrider
Here is a decent solution by Rod Elliot. Pots with linear tapers tend have better tracking, as far as the element is concerned, compared to log taper. There are still the mechanical concerns that you have outlined, but this can help give a more ideal overall log taper compared to standard log pots.

ESP - A Better Volume Control
__________________
AJ
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Krell amp with channel imbalance Johpat Solid State 0 31st October 2010 05:49 PM
channel imbalance!!!! need help tubo Tubes / Valves 5 10th December 2009 06:30 PM
Yaqin MC-100b channel imbalance al3700 Tubes / Valves 1 22nd October 2009 06:35 PM
Volume control : - pot' or pot' variable feedback resistor (gain) ? ash_dac Solid State 5 1st August 2006 05:07 AM
Low volume imbalance lazyfly Solid State 6 26th June 2004 06:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2