
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
8th October 2010, 09:00 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member

My version of the G = 1000 low noise measurement amp (for Ikoflexer).
This is my take on Ikoflexor's low noise measurement preamp.
I used a Vishay photovoltaic MOSFET driver (http://www.vishay.com/docs/81225/ssrvo126.pdf) in an unusual way to make a negative bias on the input JFET. This eliminates the huge capacitor in series with the 1 Ohm gain resistor. In fact there are no electrolytics in the signal path. The back to back PV arrays make a nice bipolar bias reference and you can simply flip the diodes to reverse polarity. On dual supplies this voltage can go outside both rails (when referenced to ground). R3 is selected for ~1/2 the supply at the drain off J1 at the desired drain current. Then when R2 is ~2XR3 the drain voltage will track roughly ½ the supply voltage over a wide range with no further adjustment. The MOSFET driver can be looked at as an isolated current in current out device (gain = .001). This times the 10Meg resistor gives a gain in this loop (FET drain current to gate voltage) of 10,000, or 10,000*gm if looked at as a voltage gain. For these FETs it's around 100 which gives decent enough operating point stability from FET to FET without trim. The nominal gain is 60dB and BW from .1Hz to >200kHz. the dual opamp arrangement has DC gain of one and acts at AC like a differential out amplifier. So the input stage finds Vcc/2 at the drain of the FET with optical feedback and the output stage sits at the same voltage. This opamp can be an ordinary biFET. An additional requirement was that the circuit could be used with 48V phantom power and make for a very simple one box set up. Of course the multiparalleled FETs at the input would work but phantom power is limited to 10mA. As built with one 2SK170 it came right out at 1.1nV as simulated and with these values and AD823, .1Hz to 400kHz. No compcap is needed at G = 1000, but it will be necessary at lower gains. Even a TL072 will work with Fmax becoming 200kHz or so. If C6 gets too large one can induce motorboating, I’m sure there is a optimum set of low frequency time constants. At 6mA current draw this whole circuit could be put under a 48V phantom supply with differential outputs on the two opamps (gain will be +6dB more). This would require a larger resistance level in the feedback network. Big advantage, 1Hz BW with no caps in the feedback network and no electrolytics needed anywhere (except bypassing). (Pictures in Pass Forum) BTW Ikoflexor my motherboard overheated and failed last week. I lost my entire address book, and it took me a few days to get the energy to assemble this.
__________________
"This logos holds always but humans always prove unable to understand it, both before hearing it and when they have first heard it." 
12th October 2010, 09:31 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003

Scott,
I presume you applied this in the JFET noise measurement setup. Could you kindly also post details of the rest ? Both schematics and photos would of course be of great interest. Many thanks, Patrick 
12th October 2010, 09:42 AM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders

would adopting a 372 in lieu of the 170 be of any noise benefit in Scott's circuit?
__________________
regards Andrew T. 
12th October 2010, 10:39 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003

Good question.
I only sent him one 372, and it had a high Idss. And he needed the circuit first to measure the 372. So I guess he had to use something else known and available. But now that we know how the 372 is in comparison, the question is a valid one. And I also wonder what is better  a single 372 or 2x 170GR in parallel ?? Patrick Last edited by EUVL; 12th October 2010 at 10:41 AM. 
12th October 2010, 05:17 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member

The resistor reference swamps the FET noise, so my cal line is very close to exact. To use this as an instrument front end I would go with the 372 below 20k, but I must confirm that the high frequency anomolies will not give problems. Right now I'm leaning toward trying some paralleled BF862's also.
__________________
"This logos holds always but humans always prove unable to understand it, both before hearing it and when they have first heard it." 
12th October 2010, 05:28 PM  #6  
diyAudio Member

Quote:
To be totally general you would want to be able to vary Vds and Id over a large range, rev 2. This setup compares apples to apples, all FETs are measured at ~1mA. Remenber the noise is a weak function of current. At 6ma there is only a factor of .64 improvement. Bit busy this week, more later.
__________________
"This logos holds always but humans always prove unable to understand it, both before hearing it and when they have first heard it." 

12th October 2010, 10:56 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003

So I short the input of the circuit as posted (before the cap C5?), replace J1 with the DUT (device under test), and measure the output with a spectrum analyser, correct ?
You mentioned in the other thread : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass...entsevul.html that you need to go to double shielding. I presume it is the amplifier that you are shielding. How about power supply  batteries ? Sorry for being such a pain, Patrick 
12th October 2010, 11:01 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003

Stupid question :
What is the value for R6 ? What does 2.7me means ? Patrick 
13th October 2010, 01:21 AM  #9  
diyAudio Member

Quote:
2.7 Meg Ohm (me is our simulators shorthand). R6 was 3K and had about 3.8V across it. I was a little imprecise the first time just seeing if the idea worked out. Every DUT I tried biased at about the same point. I used a 9V battery with the circuit in a box and them put a grounded box all around this.
__________________
"This logos holds always but humans always prove unable to understand it, both before hearing it and when they have first heard it." 

13th October 2010, 03:51 AM  #10 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003

So if I were to duplicate the circuit, I should use 2.7M for R6, correct ?
What about R3 & R2 (just some typical values) ? You mentioned a reference resistor of 20k in post #5, which one is that ? Any particular requirements for the resistors (low tempco, 1%) ? 0.1uF decoupling cao close to U1, I suppose ? Thx again, Patrick 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Filters For LowNoise Measurement Preamplifier  bryman79  Solid State  63  25th July 2011 06:24 PM 
preamp supply LOW power LOW noise LOW cost  drdagor  Power Supplies  1  13th September 2010 11:39 PM 
Ultra low noise measurement amp  tschrama  Solid State  20  22nd September 2008 04:28 PM 
New version of Audio Tester has T/S Measurement.....  venki  MultiWay  1  18th September 2005 03:09 PM 
Fs Measurement  Baffle, low ohm amp?  kimbo  MultiWay  27  30th January 2005 03:01 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 