Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd October 2010, 10:48 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 1
Default Can someone tell me why this transistor's Ft is only 5MHz!?

Cob is 2.2pF (at 100V, but it's about 6.2pF at 1V).

Maybe it's one of those weird "gotcha" parts where Ccb is really low but Cbe is near 1nF?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...1ZAtfI0PC4Dxgw

I was looking through parts on a disemboweled monitor and found it. Looked remarkably similar to the 2SC3423 at first, then I saw Ft and took a double take.

It still mystifies me why some parts have extremely low Cob and yet have low Ft.

Is this transistor suitable for use in a VAS?

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 10:57 AM   #2
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I think the answer, for this one, lies in the compromises forced on the designer to achieve high voltage capability.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 11:05 AM   #3
VHF man is offline VHF man  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
One should not confuse ft with speed.
They do not necessarily go together and speed will be dependant on the overal cct design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 11:19 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 1
I agree Andrew.

VHF, design is important, but transistor parameters will set the upper limit for high-bandwidth designs.

One might think that, as long as you have enough drive to overcome the transistor's parasitics, BW is not a problem. But if this was true, I don't think Ft would be specified like it is.

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 11:30 AM   #5
VHF man is offline VHF man  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by keantoken View Post
I agree Andrew.

VHF, design is important, but transistor parameters will set the upper limit for high-bandwidth designs.

- keantoken
I was thinking that the low transition frequency might be due (in part) to the low beta.

IMO - The hFE - IC curve is not ideal with that device.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 11:47 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 1
You're right, it's not very linear, it would make an awful VAS. However a lower Hfe should help the Ft, no? A transistor with higher gain would have lower Ib, which would be overcome more easily by the same size Ccb.

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 12:07 PM   #7
VHF man is offline VHF man  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by keantoken View Post
You're right, it's not very linear, it would make an awful VAS. However a lower Hfe should help the Ft, no? A transistor with higher gain would have lower Ib, which would be overcome more easily by the same size Ccb.

- keantoken
You correctly identify the importance of source impedance to bandwidth but..
By definition Ft is the point where current gain = 1. So assuming all other parameters are equal the transistor with higher hfe will also have a higher Ft.
I think many designers confuse device Ft with the device 'speed' and hence my original statement.
With any amplifier design you need to start with a defined output current and bandwidth and then work from PA stage back to the input stage - making sure you can actually source the designed current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 12:20 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by VHF man View Post
So assuming all other parameters are equal the transistor with higher hfe will also have a higher Ft.
No, it will have a lower Ft because the smaller Ib will be overcome by the parasitic capacitor current.

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 12:42 PM   #9
VHF man is offline VHF man  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by keantoken View Post
No, it will have a lower Ft because the smaller Ib will be overcome by the parasitic capacitor current.

- keantoken
except that Ft calcs asssume that the signal source has zero impedance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2010, 01:09 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
keantoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Blog Entries: 1
Source impedance doesn't matter if we are measuring current gain.

- keantoken
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB - Russian FT-1/FT-3 capacitors lil' knight Swap Meet 1 1st September 2010 05:06 PM
who knows what is the FT for TIP122,please ljm_ljm Solid State 3 12th April 2010 09:25 AM
problem with my forte ft-1 yanl Pass Labs 0 13th January 2005 10:25 PM
help!! smd transistor's hfe measurement oz_gur Parts 2 16th February 2004 07:19 PM
1.5 cu ft box Dave Jones Multi-Way 8 29th January 2004 01:34 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Page generated in 0.11435 seconds (78.41% PHP - 21.59% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio