|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tromsų
|
Hi!
I have put together an amplifier based on a design by G. Randy Slone, with some modifications. The problem is I get some weird oscillations on the positive half period. They start at a peak value at about ~8 volts, and continue to about ~30 volts peak value (measuring on the output). After this the top of the curve is ok, but it is still oscillations below ~30 volts. Hard to explain put see the attached pics, they explain better than words. Because of the NFB, this oscillation spreads in the entire amplifier so I cannot locate the source. Do anyone have any ideas. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
This kind of split-pole compensation is tricky. I have been simulating this myself and it is easy to end up with overshoot and ringing.
What's the value of C5 ? edit: IMO, Q8 does not need to be a 2SD669 - a 2N5551 here would be adequate. Last edited by jaycee; 20th May 2010 at 09:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tromsų
|
C5 is 15pF.
Thanks for the reply |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tromsų
|
C5 is 15 pF.
One more important thing. The problem only exists with load on the output. The more load the bigger the problem becomes. Thanks for the reply |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
I agree with Jaycee, change Q8, a 2n5551 has less than a 1/3 of the cob of the 2sd part, speeding the vas up might help.
Next to try is to put a smallish value cap maybe 100 or 47 pf between base collector of Q15 and Q14 and see what happens. I would remove the R11 C5 network at first or at least remove R and smaller C, creating too many poles here. Last edited by homemodder; 20th May 2010 at 10:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
I would not remove R11/C5, in my design, this is what stops the massive overshoot.
I noticed that your output stage is a CFP type. In this case, I would try 100-220pF Miller capacitor (collector to base) on Q14. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tromsų
|
Thanks jaycee and homemodder for pushing me in the right direction.
I have experimented a little now. 1. I looked at the two-pole compensation c8, c9 and r13. The calculations where a bit “on the edge” so I increased c9 to 1000 pF. This changed the oscillation frequency a bit but did not really solve anything. 2. Next I tried to change Q8 to 2n5551. This did not change anything. 3. I then started to experiment with the NFB loop. C5, and R11 certainly had an effect on the problem. Disconnecting the C5, R11 nettwork made the problem disappair. But the network has a purpose. C10 acts as a phase advance capasitor. It is suppose to correct for high frequency phase leg (and thereby improving stability and lower distortion). So I started to experiment with the values, lower C5 helped an as expected lowering R11 increased the problem. 4.I tried to add a miller capacitor on Q14. This helped put the problem did not disappear. I am now trying to find the middle road between a miller capacitor and changing the values to C5 and R11. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Netherlands
|
Do you have any info on the layout of your amp? Also, I see that you have made something like a Sziklai but with MOSFETs on the output. They can be quite challenging to get stable, and because of the different transconductance of the N and P channel device, the poles of the output stage move considerably when the output current crosses zero, making any compensation for this outside the OS a fruitless effort.
R11 and C5 are to compensate for the input capacitance of the input differential pair, effectively removing a pole from the transfer function of the feedback path. I'd expect the amplifier to be less stable without them, provided their values are OK. Last edited by timpert; 20th May 2010 at 03:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tromsų
|
Here is the PCB layout.
I have now put a 100pF capacitor between the base and cathode of Q14, and replaced C5 with a 4,7pF, this made the amplifier stable. Thanks for the replies. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| weird problem | sberube | Solid State | 15 | 22nd October 2008 06:27 PM |
| Weird oscillation | Wavebourn | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 3rd September 2008 02:00 AM |
| Weird oscillation problem appeared | Thoru | Solid State | 21 | 6th October 2007 07:44 PM |
| oscillation problem | ABO | Solid State | 26 | 17th June 2005 09:26 AM |
| Weird slow oscillation | edm | Chip Amps | 20 | 13th May 2003 08:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15249 seconds (65.55% PHP - 34.45% MySQL) with 11 queries |