Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th May 2010, 05:46 PM   #1
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default Any experiences bypassing UF4007 with .01uF cap?

Hi, has anybody tried bypassing a UF4007 diode with a .01uF cap? This technique is reported to work well with 1N4007's to remove RF hash in power supply circuits. I wonder if it would also work well with UF4007's which are already low noise. So I would greatly appreciate if anybody could share their experience -- whether it improved or did not make any difference or even degraded the performance.

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2010, 08:42 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
nigelwright7557's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
A diode can help but too large a value will push through AC on to the DC.

I tend to put a 100nf across the supply rather than across the diodes.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2010, 08:52 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
whitelabrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
What I've done is to use two UF4007's stacked and then bypassed both with a 0.01 uF. Cleaned up switching noise nicely.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2010, 06:59 PM   #4
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by nigelwright7557 View Post
A diode can help but too large a value will push through AC on to the DC.

I tend to put a 100nf across the supply rather than across the diodes.
You mean a bypass cap can help. For a typical bridge circuit that has 4 diodes, what would be the recommended value of the bypass cap to be placed across each diode? Is .01uF (10nF) a good value or is it too large?


Quote:
Originally Posted by whitelabrat View Post
What I've done is to use two UF4007's stacked and then bypassed both with a 0.01 uF. Cleaned up switching noise nicely.
Thanks for sharing! Was the noise clean-up only visible through a scope or did you also notice a change in the sound of your gear? How did the sound change after putting in the bypass cap?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2010, 08:45 AM   #5
Bonsai is offline Bonsai  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
See http://www.hagtech.com/pdf/snubber.pdf for an excellent discussion on snubbers and how to select the values.

Take heed on " . . . too large a value will push through AC on to the DC." because you can feed AC line hash onto your DC line.
__________________
bonsai
http://www.hifisonix.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2010, 05:36 PM   #6
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai View Post
See http://www.hagtech.com/pdf/snubber.pdf for an excellent discussion on snubbers and how to select the values.

Take heed on " . . . too large a value will push through AC on to the DC." because you can feed AC line hash onto your DC line.
Thanks, that's a great article and good info! Unfortunately, I don't have a scope to make measurements with, so will have to rely on people's advice hoping that their recommended value is in the right ballpark. It also gets more complicated with the RC snubber, so I'm hoping a simple C will be good enough even if it's not as good as RC. If I take the simple C approach, what C value would you suggest as a bypass to be placed across each UF4007 diode in a typical bridge rectifier circuit that has 4 such diodes? No need to be super accurate, I just want a value that would work for most circuits.

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2010, 05:50 PM   #7
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Quote:
I just want a value that would work for most circuits
no such thing. It depends wholly upon impedance's and current levels. Higher voltages and lower currents use lower values. Some folks just use a snubber or 2 across the secondary and HF bypasses at the bulk caps as well. With just caps (low loss snubbers) you end up pushing the noise somewhere else.
Post a circuit and you'll get better opinions.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2010, 07:03 PM   #8
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinia View Post
no such thing. It depends wholly upon impedance's and current levels. Higher voltages and lower currents use lower values. Some folks just use a snubber or 2 across the secondary and HF bypasses at the bulk caps as well. With just caps (low loss snubbers) you end up pushing the noise somewhere else.
Post a circuit and you'll get better opinions.
Please see below. It employs a voltage doubler circuit that is used to generate +15V and -15V, and two half-wave rectifiers to generate the +5V rails. The 9VAC input is from a wall wart rated for 3.5A that converts the mains 110VAC to 9VAC. I'd like to know what C value (or better, R and C values) I should put across each of the diodes D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, and D12. The diodes are currently 1N4001's but I'll replace them with UF4007's which are what I have available.

BTW, it is the power supply of the Delta 1010 sound card.

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png Delta1010PSUschem.png (14.2 KB, 270 views)

Last edited by mtl777; 12th May 2010 at 07:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2010, 05:44 AM   #9
Bonsai is offline Bonsai  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
MTL777, its easy to obsess about snubber values, but at the end of the day if you are 90% there, then you have probably solved the noise problem. For small diodes (i.e. up to about 2 or 4 amps) and bridges, I use 1nF and 100 Ohms. Try that and it should do the trick.
__________________
bonsai
http://www.hifisonix.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2010, 06:06 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
prairiemystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Are you talking low-voltage ~30VAC or high-voltage ~650VAC?
I always put 0.01uF's across each transformer secondary winding. I checked with a 100MHz scope and the UF4007 switches very clean at low voltages.
When you get up past 300VAC, in tube gear, then you have to use snubbers.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Info on cap bypassing FH123 Parts 0 27th January 2008 08:28 AM
looking for .01uF russian teflons jarthel Swap Meet 2 14th April 2007 10:39 PM
Bypassing input cap on IGC? Dumbass Chip Amps 6 13th October 2005 03:19 AM
Advice on cap bypassing please. protos Pass Labs 18 1st May 2002 04:38 AM
What value of cap for opamp PS bypassing? overmind Solid State 4 13th February 2002 06:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Page generated in 0.23651 seconds (46.94% PHP - 53.06% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio