|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near the Ganges
|
Hello there!
I have assembled two capacitance multipliers and with BD139+TIP3055 it is doing its job. No hum No buzz no etc. etc. I made only the positive side coz my amps are output cap coupled single supply type. LINK->Capacitance Multiplier Power Supply Filter Life is good with these multipliers. But the time of change has come and I'm confused. Two days ago I discovered One shop here in Kolkata surprising me with "Yes" when I asked "Do you have these transistors?". I bought two 2SC5200s, costing about 100 rupees (~$2) per device. Fake? Don't know. I have all the main amplifier circuits finished, tested and ready to be put inside the cabinet. So the only place I could think of placing these two monsters are the multipliers. Under the above circumstances I have some confusions and questions about the influences of the devices used in the multiplier on the sound quality and bandwidth of source follower type single ended class-a amps. 1. I heard that the output signal chain runs all through the power supply for these kind of amps. Is this true and can someone please explain how? 2. Does a large value( >1000uF) capacitor at the output of the multiplier electrically hides (bypasses) the multiplying devices from the amp? If yes, then does it help with a varying current class-a amp like these, and how much? 3. Does putting a fast gain device like 2SC5200 in the multiplier make it sound better than with TIP3055? 4. Is there any chance of oscillation in the multiplier when made with fast transistors? 5. Can the multiplier power devices be paralleled without an emitter resistor? Thanks in advance.
__________________
LESS "THINGS", MORE LIFE |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
The only exception could be a Lateral MOSfet.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near the Ganges
|
bump.
__________________
LESS "THINGS", MORE LIFE |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
|
Hi shaan, are we talking about a charge pump here?
IE are you charging one capacitor from one rail & then switching so that the capacitor is now on top of the original rail voltage & thus nearly doubling it? No we aren't. Sorry, just took a look at the link 3. I very much doubt it as the base will be tied to a rather large capacitor which is deliberately designed to slow things down, hence the title "capacitance multiplier" 4. Again i doubt it'll oscillate simply because of 3. 5. As AndrewT says, you'll only get away with paralleling devices that have a negative temperature coefficient without an emitter resistor.
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin Last edited by event horizon; 5th May 2010 at 06:22 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near the Ganges
|
thanks.
__________________
LESS "THINGS", MORE LIFE |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
There are topologies that offer the potential to keep the signal out of the power supply. One of them is a single ended amplifier with a constant current source load. i.e. it is NOT a push-pull Class A amplifier (or an Aleph current source). The output capacitor and speaker are in series and connected across the active output device of the amplifier. The signal current then theoretically doesn't flow through the PSU, which sees only the constant current source load current. You can do something similar with push-pull using a virtual earth. In this case you can more or less keep the signal out of the Capacitance Multiplier, but you need large value low ESR capacitor on the output of the amplifier to pull this trick off (as you suggest in point 2.) and wiring/layout is also important. I've no idea, it would be good to experiment. TIP3055 is a modern device, not like the old 2N3055. I'm not sure a Cap multiplier takes advantage of the qualities of the 2SC5200 either.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Near the Ganges
|
So I think it's a no prob thing. Thankz people!
__________________
LESS "THINGS", MORE LIFE |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Capacitance Multiplier PSU | Ted205 | Chip Amps | 3 | 2nd March 2009 01:27 PM |
| Capacitance Multiplier | Kinnja | Solid State | 2 | 13th January 2008 08:12 PM |
| Capacitance Multiplier, Caps? | roger-k | Power Supplies | 2 | 6th December 2006 11:43 PM |
| Capacitance multiplier problem | Kari | Solid State | 7 | 5th February 2005 06:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14655 seconds (69.86% PHP - 30.14% MySQL) with 10 queries |