|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
|
Quote:
Can you direct me to information on nonlinear mixing in this application? I looked online and found a lot of IEEE papers and optics-related articles, but nothing that I could access related to noise or audio amplifiers. From what I could find, an in-band frequency can be created by one or more out-of-band frequencies in three instances: summation, difference, and harmonics. Anyone know how the amplitude of the in-band frequency is calculated in each instance with respect to gain? -Bryan |
|
|
|
|
#62 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Zürich
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is an inherent trade-off between headroom (or overload margin or insensitivity to out-of-band signals) and low noise. For lowest noise you want to amplify the signal first, then filter. That way the typically rather noisy filter stages are less significant noise contributors as the signal has been lifted above their noise floor. For best headroom you want to filter first (to minimize signal energy and remove out-of-band content), then amplify. There exists an infinite number of compromises in between these two extremes--first amplify a bit, then filter, then again an amplifier. There are even commercial amplifiers where you can switch between two modes--lowest noise or best headroom. In my preamp design you asked about in some e-mail I kept first stage gain low to get very good headroom. At the cost of some noise performance. It get's back to what I said above: you need to know what you want to do with this preamp. If you're measuring discrete high-performance linear power supplies there is likely not much out-of-band energy, but you want lowest noise to not influence the measurement. If you're investigating standard switching regulators noise contribution from the preamp is hardly a difficult issue; however, there's considerable high-frequency energy around which needs to be removed before significant amplification can take place. Samuel Last edited by Samuel Groner; 23rd July 2011 at 02:50 PM. |
||
|
|
|
#63 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks, Bryan |
||
|
|
|
#64 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Zürich
|
Quote:
Quote:
Samuel |
||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Extreme Low Noise Preamplifier 0,4 nV/Sqr(Hz) | peranders | Solid State | 9 | 28th April 2010 10:22 AM |
| anyone with a low noise preamplifier circuit for guitar? | winner | Instruments and Amps | 3 | 14th January 2009 06:51 AM |
| Ultra low noise measurement amp | tschrama | Solid State | 20 | 22nd September 2008 04:28 PM |
| Antenna noise filters | Spraiski | Car Audio | 4 | 12th July 2008 07:52 PM |
| Ultra low noise filters | tiroth | Solid State | 14 | 21st May 2002 10:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11095 seconds (73.78% PHP - 26.22% MySQL) with 11 queries |