To improve the sound of Nakamichi PA-5 ?

c3conv · 24th March 2010, 02:01 AM

I read from audioreview.com a certain Mike had this to share in his review. "When I first took the PA-5 home I thought it airy and very nice..until I played Judy Collins and other high-pitched singers. They sounded truly bad,like early solid-state recievers. I put the amp on the test bench and found that it easily met all its specs. So what was wrong? Well,when I put square waves into the amp (a way of testing the transient and phase behavior of an amplifier)they did not come out the way they went in...this is never a good thing. Upon analysis I found that the feed-back loop was not configured to properly address the low midrange/upper bass. Attempting to find out what was up I called Nakamichi. Everyone I spoke to refused to talk to me about it...until I got to one brave tech who told me he knew what I was talking about but would be fired if he said anything!
Well,it turned out the solution was to examine a REAL Stasis amp and incorporate the componant feedback values into the PA-5. What a difference! The amp was warmer with better dynamics and the voices were now coherent. It seems that Nakamichi set the feedback values to make the amp look good on paper at the sacrifice of its real world
performance! At any rate the total cost of parts was $5.00
so I would not hesitate to buy this amp on the used market.
Now to the sound...The PA-5 has a warm softly detailed quality,never bright, and is very gentle on the ears. It produces a COHERENT soundstage." You can find this here:Nakamichi PA-5 Videos and Related Media
My question is does this make sense? Can anyone share their thoughts on this? Does anybody know the feedback value of the Stasis amp? Does all the Stasis amps have the same feedback value? I have a PA 5-A and wouldn't mind spending $5 investment for such great improvement. It will also help others have the PA-5 or help others maybe get one and do the cheap upgrade.
Your help will be greatly APPRECIATED!!!

JamesBrennan4 · 24th March 2010, 05:30 PM

Can you be more specific as to which components were changed?

c3conv · 06:32 PM

Sorry I am not a tech guy and I am wondering if what he said makes sense. Does it makes sense to you? thanks for the reply.

JamesBrennan4 · 24th March 2010, 10:46 PM

Just took a look at the schematics for the PA-5, PA-7 and several Stasis amplifiers.
The PA-5 and PA-7 have a 10uF (C102) in the feedback loop, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 50Hz.
The Stasis amplifiers have a 470uF capacitor, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 2Hz.
Even so, I have never noticed my PA-7 being deficient in bass response.

c3conv · 02:03 AM

Thanks again for the reply. Based on what he said...
"Well,it turned out the solution was to examine a REAL Stasis amp and incorporate the componant feedback values into the PA-5. What a difference! The amp was warmer with better dynamics and the voices were now coherent. It seems that Nakamichi set the feedback values to make the amp look good on paper at the sacrifice of its real world performance! At any rate the total cost of parts was $5.00 so I would not hesitate to buy this amp on the used market. Now to the sound...The PA-5 has a warm softly detailed quality,never bright, and is very gentle on the ears. It produces a COHERENT soundstage."
...is it possible that what he was driving at could be to change the 10uF (C102) in the feedback loop of the PA-5 that was giving 50Hz to whatever was needed (can be the same value of 470uF capacitor) to reach 2Hz then things will improve?

JamesBrennan4 · 25th March 2010, 02:32 AM

Yes.

If you try it, let us know the results.

c3conv · 25th March 2010, 01:29 PM

Thank you for the help. I have to find time as well as ask somebody to help me do this. Will get back to you as soon as I get to try it.

analog_sa · 25th March 2010, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesBrennan4

The PA-5 and PA-7 have a 10uF (C102) in the feedback loop, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 50Hz.
The Stasis amplifiers have a 470uF capacitor, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 2Hz.

A little knowledge can be dangerous. Do you actually believe the Nak engineers are that stupid?

analog_sa · 25th March 2010, 05:07 PM

The PA-5 circuit appears virtually identical to the Threshold circuits. After staring at it for a while the only topological difference i can spot is the VAS which is a cascode in the Threshold amps. No idea if this alone can bring such a substantial difference in sound but with some imagination i can see it being transplanted dead-bug style on the Nak board - it's just a single transistor and biasing. Then there is the slightly different compensation, the protection relay and obviously all the different parts. Nothing looks in any way inferior than the Threshold amps. I suspect ** in the audioreview quote.

Nelson Pass · 26th March 2010, 06:34 PM

My experience is that bias values are the most likely issue.
Nak's circuits seem to be intelligently done as a rule, but
the circuit does depend on a healthy output stage bias -
something that doesn't reflect in the curves.

If you can adjust the bias so that the long term heat sink
figures are 50 deg C (cover on, 2 hours later, etc.) then you
may experience an improvement.

24th March 2010, 02:01 AM	#1
c3conv diyAudio Member Join Date: Mar 2008	To improve the sound of Nakamichi PA-5 ? I read from audioreview.com a certain Mike had this to share in his review. "When I first took the PA-5 home I thought it airy and very nice..until I played Judy Collins and other high-pitched singers. They sounded truly bad,like early solid-state recievers. I put the amp on the test bench and found that it easily met all its specs. So what was wrong? Well,when I put square waves into the amp (a way of testing the transient and phase behavior of an amplifier)they did not come out the way they went in...this is never a good thing. Upon analysis I found that the feed-back loop was not configured to properly address the low midrange/upper bass. Attempting to find out what was up I called Nakamichi. Everyone I spoke to refused to talk to me about it...until I got to one brave tech who told me he knew what I was talking about but would be fired if he said anything! Well,it turned out the solution was to examine a REAL Stasis amp and incorporate the componant feedback values into the PA-5. What a difference! The amp was warmer with better dynamics and the voices were now coherent. It seems that Nakamichi set the feedback values to make the amp look good on paper at the sacrifice of its real world performance! At any rate the total cost of parts was $5.00 so I would not hesitate to buy this amp on the used market. Now to the sound...The PA-5 has a warm softly detailed quality,never bright, and is very gentle on the ears. It produces a COHERENT soundstage." You can find this here:Nakamichi PA-5 Videos and Related Media My question is does this make sense? Can anyone share their thoughts on this? Does anybody know the feedback value of the Stasis amp? Does all the Stasis amps have the same feedback value? I have a PA 5-A and wouldn't mind spending $5 investment for such great improvement. It will also help others have the PA-5 or help others maybe get one and do the cheap upgrade. Your help will be greatly APPRECIATED!!!

24th March 2010, 06:29 PM	#3
c3conv diyAudio Member Join Date: Mar 2008	Sorry I am not a tech guy and I am wondering if what he said makes sense. Does it makes sense to you? thanks for the reply. Last edited by c3conv; 24th March 2010 at 06:32 PM.

25th March 2010, 01:42 AM	#5
c3conv diyAudio Member Join Date: Mar 2008	Thanks again for the reply. Based on what he said... "Well,it turned out the solution was to examine a REAL Stasis amp and incorporate the componant feedback values into the PA-5. What a difference! The amp was warmer with better dynamics and the voices were now coherent. It seems that Nakamichi set the feedback values to make the amp look good on paper at the sacrifice of its real world performance! At any rate the total cost of parts was $5.00 so I would not hesitate to buy this amp on the used market. Now to the sound...The PA-5 has a warm softly detailed quality,never bright, and is very gentle on the ears. It produces a COHERENT soundstage." ...is it possible that what he was driving at could be to change the 10uF (C102) in the feedback loop of the PA-5 that was giving 50Hz to whatever was needed (can be the same value of 470uF capacitor) to reach 2Hz then things will improve? Last edited by c3conv; 25th March 2010 at 02:03 AM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Nakamichi PA-7 & PA-5 Bias Setting?	sourceoneaudio	Solid State	6	8th March 2012 12:37 PM
Nakamichi PA-1 problem	tarkusnj	Solid State	2	11th October 2011 07:39 AM
Nakamichi PA-1 Schematics	gto127	Solid State	0	18th February 2009 05:03 PM
Nakamichi PA-7II manuals - HELP	Peteb	Pass Labs	4	4th October 2007 07:09 PM
Nakamichi Receiver 1 PA	456jss456	Solid State	2	6th February 2007 11:58 PM


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

24th March 2010, 05:30 PM	#2
JamesBrennan4 diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Silicon Valley, California	Can you be more specific as to which components were changed?

24th March 2010, 10:46 PM	#4
JamesBrennan4 diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Silicon Valley, California	Just took a look at the schematics for the PA-5, PA-7 and several Stasis amplifiers. The PA-5 and PA-7 have a 10uF (C102) in the feedback loop, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 50Hz. The Stasis amplifiers have a 470uF capacitor, giving a low frequency roll off at ~ 2Hz. Even so, I have never noticed my PA-7 being deficient in bass response.

25th March 2010, 02:32 AM	#6
JamesBrennan4 diyAudio Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Silicon Valley, California	Yes. If you try it, let us know the results.

25th March 2010, 01:29 PM	#7
c3conv diyAudio Member Join Date: Mar 2008	Thank you for the help. I have to find time as well as ask somebody to help me do this. Will get back to you as soon as I get to try it.

25th March 2010, 05:07 PM	#9
analog_sa diyAudio Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Cascais	The PA-5 circuit appears virtually identical to the Threshold circuits. After staring at it for a while the only topological difference i can spot is the VAS which is a cascode in the Threshold amps. No idea if this alone can bring such a substantial difference in sound but with some imagination i can see it being transplanted dead-bug style on the Nak board - it's just a single transistor and biasing. Then there is the slightly different compensation, the protection relay and obviously all the different parts. Nothing looks in any way inferior than the Threshold amps. I suspect ** in the audioreview quote.

26th March 2010, 06:34 PM	#10
Nelson Pass The one and only Join Date: Mar 2001	My experience is that bias values are the most likely issue. Nak's circuits seem to be intelligently done as a rule, but the circuit does depend on a healthy output stage bias - something that doesn't reflect in the curves. If you can adjust the bias so that the long term heat sink figures are 50 deg C (cover on, 2 hours later, etc.) then you may experience an improvement.

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read