|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
hi,
As what i know, Quasi-complementary also works like push-pull amplifier. Just that push-pull is using 1 NPN and 1 PNP transistor. while Quasi-complementary is using 3 NPN and 1 PNP transistor. They both perform push-pull action. They sure have their own personality which i hope that someone can help me on this. What is the different if we compare both output? is it from a way of power? current? Can someone help in this? thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
or can i say that quasi-complementary amplifier has higher gain?
thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
In my experience they sound pretty much the same but thats probably no recommendation with my hearing !
The quasi is a little odd in that one driver is a buffer and the other is an amplifying inverter. This can cause problems. I found in my design I needed a 220pf from base to collector on the inverting driver to slow it down a bit. The quasi really comes from the days of weak or none existant pnp transistors. I built a Maplin 225WRMS quasi in the 1980's and used it on a mobile disco it was really powerful and reliable.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
G² |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
what is the advantages for quasi-complementary?The design is out just because of those days the price of a PNP transistor?
thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
G² |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Push-Pull" for push und "Push-Pull" for pull (like Gamnut) - whats the right name? | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 68 | 26th December 2011 07:17 PM |
| Quasi-comp bipolar amp schematics | BlackCatSound | Solid State | 2 | 23rd January 2006 10:24 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| High power regulated, quasi-comp. | Stocker | Solid State | 26 | 28th December 2004 04:13 AM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08922 seconds (74.54% PHP - 25.46% MySQL) with 10 queries |