|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
Quote:
I then test by putting a household iron on the heatsink until it goes above 80 degrees c. I found it to be very stable despite not having bias transistor on output heatsink.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD50 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
|
Actually, if D1-D4 have reasonable thermal contact with the output mosfets then they will stabilize the BIAS current, maybe just being inside the hot case might work. Not particular great, but might work in practice....
Q8 & Q12 need to have a diode, otherwise their intrinsic CB diode could be biased. Although it might not matter that much in PA applications.... And of course, the simple current limit should be made into a proper VI limiter. Soren |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
D1-D4 are 15V zener diode for protection not for bias. Once again I must replay this circuit is no experimental, amplifiers tested and uses over 10 years. Take a good look on this schematics again.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
PCB and Montage Plan for APEX MOSFET
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.
|
I would like to suggest on that current limit circuit a diode be placed in the collectors of Q12 and Q11. It is also nice to place a diode in the emitter of those same transistors.
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
|
Quote:
D1-D4 are regular diodes, they have a negative temperature coefficient, basically lowering the current though the simple bias resistors when things heat up.... And you should be happy for that because otherwise you WOULD have had thermal runaway. Again, not very stable or predictive, but apperently good enough.... Soren |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: May 2006
|
I think you got it a little wrong , apexaudio is saying his mosfets are biased at 200 mA, the vas current is 30 mA, its quite high but thats why its a cfp vas.
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
I suggest anyone who want make upgrade on this circut is free to do it, and build new version. Original design work great for long time, and even beginer can easy build this amplifier. If you are beginer in DIY use my PCB design for first build.
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
I am sory for mixing diode, my mistake. When amp heating mosfet bias current litle lowering in fact.
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
This is PCB for protection. Use 2x18V AC for power. There are Soft-Start, DC, Overload and Thermal protect on 90deg. Two speed fan control 60deg (12V to 24V) when temperature heatsink is 60deg. Stabilized +/-15V for XLR and bridge input PCB. Temperature senzor is tranzistor BD241C.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IRFP240&IRFP9240 power amplifier schematic | mos | Solid State | 31 | 26th June 2012 08:21 AM |
| IRFP240 / IRFP9240 MOSFETs | danieljw | Swap Meet | 8 | 4th July 2009 01:51 AM |
| Wtb: Irfp240 / Irfp9240 | folkeb | Swap Meet | 1 | 10th March 2009 10:18 AM |
| IRFP240 + IRFP9240 -- pairs | jackinnj | Swap Meet | 1 | 2nd June 2006 02:22 AM |
| IRFP240 and IRFP9240 Wanted | richeros | Swap Meet | 1 | 9th November 2002 12:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |