Phase Lead: C or RC compensation - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th February 2010, 07:45 AM   #1
GEirin is offline GEirin  Argentina
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mendoza
Default Phase Lead: C or RC compensation

Hi all
Question:Which Phase Lead?
In Pass A40 amplifier use Capacitor compensation (C4).
And JLH 100W use RC compensation (R5/C6).
Which is better or which is design criterion. Pros and cons.
Thanks
GEirin
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pass A40.JPG (74.2 KB, 130 views)
File Type: gif JLH100w.gif (16.0 KB, 130 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2010, 10:01 AM   #2
h_a is offline h_a  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
h_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Graz, Austria
There are many free application notes available on stability just google

D. Feucht, 2-pole compensation
R. Mancini, SLOA020A from TI

and more. These cover the technical side of things, for listening impressions you need to dig the forum.

Have fun, Hannes
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th February 2010, 10:06 AM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
in a later version of the JLH he adopted a variable resistor for R5 and said trim until the squarewave was the most accurate shape. But he had 5 different locations where he installed comp in this one amplifier. Crimson also has multiple comp locations.

This type of compensation is very common in British designed amplifiers. Much less common outside the UK.

Notice the ratio of nearly 3:1 for r20:r14, the delay on the q9 protection and 4locations for comp.

What is the purpose of C4?
__________________
regards Andrew T.

Last edited by AndrewT; 24th February 2010 at 10:12 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 03:09 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Hello

Here is the link to the two articles of D. Feucht about 2-pole compensation:

Part 1:

http://www.analogzone.com/col_0628.pdf

Part 2:

http://www.analogzone.com/col_0719.pdf

Bye

Gaetan

Last edited by gaetan8888; 25th February 2010 at 03:20 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2010, 09:24 AM   #5
GEirin is offline GEirin  Argentina
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mendoza
h_a, AndrewT and Gaetan8888
Thanks very much for yours replys.
GEirin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Miller compensation with a series RC network? Bricolo Parts 5 27th February 2010 01:19 PM
phase compensation due to driver offsets DcibeL Multi-Way 51 1st June 2008 06:35 PM
UcD - correlation between phase lead network and propagation delay Cro maniac Class D 2 12th April 2008 06:35 AM
Lead or Lag compensation?? vynuhl.addict Solid State 4 14th February 2007 11:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2