diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Solid State (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/)
-   -   All FET folded cascode driver for "JLH"-buffer with no GNFB (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/160148-all-fet-folded-cascode-driver-jlh-buffer-no-gnfb.html)

revintage 28th January 2010 05:52 PM

All FET folded cascode driver for "JLH"-buffer with no GNFB
 
1 Attachment(s)
This idea is with some unusal takes. Feedback is local and only over the cascode as the buffer is enough feedbacked in itself. Also the locally feedbacked cascode will act very much like a triode.

Output stage is a JLH with a PNP driver that makes it a pushpull follower with unity gain, low distortion and low Zout.

RDC is for balancing initial offset of the buffer and only works if Q4 has lower Vbe than than Q1.

The DC-servo is integrated with the voltage-controlled gyrator( a CCS will not work against a JFET) at the bottom.

With Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5 and Q6 on the heatsink thermal-drift will be quite low even without the servo.

The Q5/Q6 CCS is fed by 20V to allow Q1 to swing up to 15V-Vbe.

Tried sims with a BJT in place of J1 but got indications of a less pleasant overtone structure.

Wavebourn 28th January 2010 06:05 PM

Hi Lars; is your servo stable enough?

revintage 28th January 2010 06:26 PM

Hey Anatoliy,
Donīt know, just drew a std configuration. Any suggestions how to do a stable one? Will anyway try the circuit without servo at first.

Wavebourn 28th January 2010 06:32 PM

You have 3 poles, and at least 2 of RC networks have the same time constants.

I'm afraid it will oscillate.

revintage 28th January 2010 07:49 PM

1 Attachment(s)
OK, then we skip R13/C3 to get only two poles. Also we make C1 bigger, like 2,2u. Will that be good enough?

Or letīs go crazy and dump the servo:D.

Wavebourn 28th January 2010 07:57 PM

I would make it smaller

revintage 28th January 2010 08:11 PM

Yeah, but at some point it begins to impair lowend response/phase. No problem going to .47u or .33u anyway.

Bigun 28th January 2010 09:50 PM

Would there be some benefit if impedance of feedback could be lower, say 2k series and 220R shunt ?

juma 28th January 2010 10:00 PM

Lars, that looks like a nice gain stage :up:
I see you love the gyrator - I never tested one (except long time ago in parametric EQ) in preamp/gain stage - what sonic benefits you experinced with it?

Wavebourn 29th January 2010 12:13 AM

It may sound gorgeous, when properly built.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Đ1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2