|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
In my day job I have been working with various types of equalization to mitigate the reflection and attenuation of PCB traces for data rates in the 8-10 Gbit/sec range. These techniques include FIR and DFE and CTLE. It would be interesing to see if these techniques could be applied to audio.
The basic idea would be to use a microphone to measure a pulse response of an audio chain and then select the appropriate equalization coefficients such that the signal measured at the microphone closely replicates the original voltage pulse response. Coefficient selection could be done by various optimization techniques: LMS, zero forcing, etc. The equalization length would need to be fairly long, essentially the room and speaker's decay time times the sample rate. Sample rate would need to be at at least 2x Nyquist. So we are talking about filter lengths of several thousand taps, although each tap would not need to be unique. To the extent that the audio chain and room acoustics are linear with signal amplitude, the coefficients will remain independent of signal amplitude. Work of this nature was done years ago by telephone companies to implement adaptive echo cancellation. For audio, however, the equalization would not need to be continuously adaptive.
__________________
JCM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
It's a little different when you are dealing with 3-D reflections and there is already a processor (your brain) doing some unknown corrections to the received signals. I think most likely you will cause more harm than good.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
|
The more you adjust the equalization curve at one listening location, the worse it gets at all other listening positions.
The more you adjust the transient response curve, the worse the sustain response curve gets.
__________________
Kevin |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What happens to a speaker when you remove the dustcap? | davidallancole | Multi-Way | 21 | 1st December 2007 12:39 AM |
| Designing x-overs - account for room effects? | black300zx | Multi-Way | 8 | 31st January 2007 08:18 AM |
| How to remove glue from metal speaker grilles??? | Bull | Multi-Way | 9 | 11th May 2005 03:47 PM |
| Active/Room Equalization | sdclc126 | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th January 2005 09:13 PM |
| Dipole / Bipole rear effects speaker | NicolasGaal | Multi-Way | 1 | 4th January 2004 09:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06489 seconds (71.20% PHP - 28.80% MySQL) with 10 queries |