Beware!!!!! Fake Sankens

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
This is a much sought after part from Sanken. One is an original, the other a FAKE. The complementary part 2SC2922 looks very close like the original too. Information on how to tell them apart can be found at

http://www.ampslab.com/projects.htm

Regards
Mike
 

Attachments

  • front.jpg
    front.jpg
    14.3 KB · Views: 834
FAKE

Micheal,

I have taken a look of some 2SA/SC transistors on my shelf and i noticed the following. The lettering "SANKEN" seems original to me but the production run number is in the middle.

I am confused, are they fake or not ?

Greetings from Holland
Piersma
 
Re: FAKE

Piersma said:
Micheal,

I have taken a look of some 2SA/SC transistors on my shelf and i noticed the following. The lettering "SANKEN" seems original to me but the production run number is in the middle.

I am confused, are they fake or not ?

Greetings from Holland
Piersma


Hi, Yes I am extremely confused too. Maybe they are both real!
Below a picture from www.schuro.de that I believe is the genuine article. Mike do you have measurements or listening tests to prove which one is real?:confused: :confused:
 

Attachments

  • 2sc2922.jpg
    2sc2922.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 744
Hi everyone,

The one on the right is the real one.

Piersma, Elso....look like your Sankens are OK :nod:. If you have the time, check out my site or Rod's. The visual differences are explained more in detail.

orginally posted by Elso
you have measurements or listening tests to prove which one is real?

I don't need to. Let's just put it as "supplier & customer confidentiality". If you like to know more, drop me a mail.

What about those?
They are the original transistors from an old Crest 5000.

/Hugo

I can only verify 2sc2922 and 2sa1216. The ones in the Crest should be real. One of the main difference between a fake and an original is the inability to supply the same power output. The frightening part is this particular fakes look like real.

Regards
 
Re: Inside view

mcp said:
I finally cracked open the fake Sanken and compare it to an original. The differences are quite astounding. You can see them at:

http://www.ampslab.com/projects.htm

Regards
Hi Michael,
I am sorry but my gutsfeeling tells me it is the other way around.
I feel the transistor with the die directly attached to the collector case is the real one and the one with the TO-220 case attached to the larger plate is fake.
Maybe others know more about the inwards of transistors.
Please be careful, wash your hands!
You might be exposed to Berylium that is highly toxic.

:att'n:
 
Hi Elso,

Thanks for the warning.

I can assure everyone that the one on the right is the genuine Sanken. I have a few hundred pairs of the originals. I've tested them in prototypes, I've used them in finished designs, I've used them in 1pair, 2pairs, 3pairs, 4pairs... up to 9pairs per channel. Most were in Class AB, some in full Class A.

There were some points I did not put in my site for I wanted to focus on just the main issues. Perhaps this is the right time to share them with everyone.

First, I tried sawing through the plastic with a normal hacksaw. In the original, it was very tough. When that didn't work, I pounded it with a hammer. It took quite a fair bit of pounding before the original started to crack, but it was much easier with the fake. The plastic on the fake is brittle.

Remember the shiny coating at the back of the fake.

When I filed the base, the shiny coating started to flake off easily, in fairly small pieces. It is actually low quality chrome plating.

If you look at the inside, the original die is much bigger. It is embeded in a TO3P back plate which is then bonded to a bigger plate. This is a costlier process and I can only guess that it provides better heat transfer. Fake manufacturers do not incur extra cost in this manner, especially when the features are hidden. Don't forget, they are producing this in huge numbers, so every cent counts.

Perhaps Jocko can verifiy this with the rep, or better still, get them to open one for sample.

Regards
 
mcp said:
Hi Elso,

Thanks for the warning.

I can assure everyone that the one on the right is

Since the weight you reported was 10g, your balance must be a little off. ;)

I wonder why they didn't stamp the selection code in the middle. The brand stamp was almost perfect, why get sloppy on the code? That way it would be almost impossible to notice the fake by browsing through a pile semiconductors. Maybe that's why they don't do it...
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.