|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
I've built this simple SRPP & source-follower hybrid. I have 12 devices (6+6) instead of the 4 devices (2+2) shown in the schematic. I'm thinking I'll need an active device (preferably transistor rather than 6AS7 CF) between the gain stage and output devices to drive the paralleled FET capacitance. Does anyone have advice on driving these 12 devices with the schematic attached?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Christchurch
|
Perhaps replace the top 6FQ7 with a high voltage NPN (or just possibly high voltage N-Ch mosfet) with the bias changed (high value R to B+/2, cap to anode of bottom 6FQ7) and move top 6FQ7 to parallel bottom 6FQ7 (doubling peak output current). This avoids high cathode-filament voltages too. Sonic quality of triode driver will not be changed by NPN in this position since it effectively is constant-current Emitter Follower here, but output Z will be lower. Be careful what happens when gate drive too high - normal zener protection might not be enough on positive peaks with the extra current capability of the driver transistor.
Alternatively, insert an extra voltage-follower stage (Class A, Iq at least 30mA, supply greater than output stage supply rails) between triodes and mosfets, but there can be stability problems with some loads when having too low a driver output impedance when there is a lot of capacitance (better to take a little hit in the -3dB frequency; it is still likely to be pretty high). Mark |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
I would add a proper Vbe multiplier bias stage and add an extra driver stage after that.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Christchurch
|
Quote:
Adding an extra stage isn't necessarily the best way to go if the present version sounds okay with 4 devices... there are several issues to address then: the new drivers have to have their gates/bases protected from too much drive, and they mustn't drive too much current into the zeners built into the output devices, as well as questions over what it does to the linearity and delay (which need not be problems, but having something else to go wrong is something to avoid if we can). But that's still there as an alternative is my first suggestion doesn't go as well as I expect. Mark |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Driving large mosfets: active PNP turn off | Pierre | Class D | 31 | 15th August 2007 03:16 AM |
| My wacky idea for a hybrid horn loaded woofer/planar widerange hybrid loudspeaker. | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 0 | 30th November 2006 04:16 AM |
| 3 paralleled opa541's | odysseybmx414 | Chip Amps | 1 | 11th May 2005 01:37 PM |
| new hybrid amp turn on circuit | thoriated | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 26th February 2004 08:56 PM |
| Momentary relay driving circuit | dine1967 | Solid State | 7 | 8th April 2003 08:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07964 seconds (74.52% PHP - 25.48% MySQL) with 11 queries |