|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#171 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Federmann,
I have a lot of actual experience with paralleled mosfets with no source resistors. Believe me, this doesn't work at +/- 50 VDC and it works much less well at +/- 70 VDC. If you do not perform exhaustive matching (two days and over 40 devices of each type for me), the amplifier will fail spectacularly! Any damping resistors will flame, as will most of the drive section. High impedance gate drive doesn't work very well either. High distortion results. This is why I am concerned with the design here. Did you say you actually have one working now? -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
#172 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Solna
|
Quote:
This means any mismatch in current will be amplified by about 1.8. This will in turn be amplified by 1.8 and so on... (0.016A/deg * 90V * 1.2deg/W) = 1.8. Assumed was 90V rails and Rth(j-s) = 1.2degC/W, 0.4 degC/W from the insulating pad. 1 + 1.8 + 1.8^2 + 1.8^3 + ... (infinite geometric series) does not converge. Any mismatch will be amplified by infinity. At lower rail voltages it might share correctly if device matching is very tight. Somewhere around 30-40V might be OK. anatech: What amplifier are you referring to that did not employ source resistors? The matching you speak of sounds like a major PITA...
__________________
The bewitching snivvie is dulcet paragon. Last edited by megajocke; 6th November 2009 at 09:38 PM. |
|
|
|
#173 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi megajocke,
Quote:
-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
#174 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
One treatment exist...but F. is the last, to which I can to tell....
|
|
|
#175 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Solna
|
Don't worry anatech: I would never ever even think about designing something that way considering the large spread in mosfet parameters.
The matching nightmare would probably make me insane. ![]() In an active load for PSU testing I made with mosfets each one got its own current regulator loop with an op-amp.
__________________
The bewitching snivvie is dulcet paragon. Last edited by megajocke; 6th November 2009 at 10:27 PM. |
|
|
#176 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
Michael,
you are apparently filled with a genuine sense of profound excitement for an underdeveloped idea, based on circulating marginated stereotype templates of random concepts, exacerbated by poorly substantiated technical suppositions and a neglectful, fragmentary cross-functional sequence analysis, lacking applicative-type structure norms and a reliable symptomatic long-term specificity, obscuring the outcome. You should, however, show your overwhelming but unfounded admiration in a calm and collected manner in oder to avoid finding yourself in the cumbersome situation of being threatened with a stiff bin time sentence. |
|
|
#177 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi megajocke,
Quote:
![]() I figured you knew, my comment was actually for people who have not tried to dance with this particular devil. ![]() Hi Lumba, You crack me right up!! ![]() Nicely put sir! -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
anatech,
|
|
|
#179 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Koskenkorva Land
|
Quote:
__________________
"If transistors are blueberries and FETs are strawberries, then tubes must be.. pears" Michael 29th January 2010 |
|
|
|
#180 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Then another haunted explosions. I will return back to their topology. Voltage ±32V and load 6Ω. ![]() ![]() ![]() Voltage ±32V, load 3Ω, at 20°C. ![]() Voltage ±32V, load 3Ω, at 80°C. ![]() Voltage ±32V, load 3Ω, at 20°C ÷ 80°C. I see that increasing temperature and decreasing current! ![]() More shows temperature dependence of the RDS. Less temperature dependence is reflected VGS Nice day Last edited by Federmann; 7th November 2009 at 08:34 AM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
| Sendy |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UcD like topology amp. | Bender.ru | Class D | 175 | 1st December 2009 01:48 PM |
| Anyone seen this amp topology before? | BlackUnikorn | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 6th August 2008 08:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11291409 seconds (79.99% PHP - 20.01% MySQL) with 11 queries |