|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hi there,
I'm about to get the ferric chloride out and make a few boards up, and before I do I'd appreciate any comments on the design and layout atached. in return they are placed in the public domain, for what they're worth ![]() It's intended for 100W into 8R. The DC rails will be +/-50V I think the design is fairly conservative - it's based on a dev board I made with the ability to try out a lot of different ideas; my conclusion was to keep it simple. It fits on a standard 100x160 eurocard and the only external components are the output power transistors (possibly some ballast resistors for them) and OP transistor d-caps (these will be wired- point-to-piont with their own ground). I want to use low voltage-high performance transistors in some places, and I'd be really interested in any comments about start-up / fault etc conditions that might over-volt them. I'd like any suggestions for more suitable transistors for the LTP too... Also If I've done anything silly ![]() Cheers,
__________________
I am not an atomic playboy. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
But your circuit seems very interesting.
Have you built it? I will be looking forward by your testings into the real thing. regards, Carlos
__________________
Sons visiting uncle charlie; http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=5T76qsvZrdw; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb_wolQGU5Y |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego
|
They are for cascode, right?
Tom |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hi,
Thanks Tom, yes you're right (I spotted that right after I submitted the post ![]() Will work much better with PNP... Also the bias adjust pot should be 1k, not 500R. Cheers, -- Ben
__________________
I am not an atomic playboy. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hi Carlos,
The three transistors on each side of the LTP are after a mic amp I did with multiple supermatched pairs on the front end; depending on testing I may only fit one or two of them. It almost seems like something for nothing in terms of noise though. I have built a fairly rough prototype of it (with PNP transistors in Q15/17...) and it works; step response and FFT looks good, but once I get the PCBs done I'll take it into work where I have an AP and let you know.
__________________
I am not an atomic playboy. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
Why have you used multiple transistors in parallel ?
My amps work fine with one transistor where you have used 2 or 3.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD50 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Hi,
The reason for multiple transistors in the LTP is noise reduction. Noise in this type of design is pretty much dominated by the input transistors; specifically by their base spreading resistance. Fitting three in parallel reduces this resistance by 2/3, and so noise should be reduced by 1/sqrt(3). Doesn't quite work that well in practice, but the reduction in noise is useful, given the cost. The other places where there are two transistors in parallel are option fits - I was not sure whether I would want a TO92 or TO126 package in these positions so I've dual-pitched them to give me some options on transistor choice when I'm testing. Cheers,
__________________
I am not an atomic playboy. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
...specifically, if I need to increase the current from the Q20/Q26 source, I'm a bit concerned about running out of safe operating area with TO92 devices.
__________________
I am not an atomic playboy. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW England
|
On a practical note. I'd make your pad drill marks much smaller (15 thou, say). You've almost no annulus to solder to, and they would easily lift with rework.
Cheers. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Recife - Brasil Northeast
|
thank you Atomic
Carlos
__________________
Sons visiting uncle charlie; http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=5T76qsvZrdw; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb_wolQGU5Y |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any comments on this design? | icebear | Tubes / Valves | 23 | 19th May 2009 04:07 PM |
| Need comments on amp design | mightydub | Solid State | 28 | 24th December 2008 01:01 AM |
| My first amp design - comments | blueskynis | Solid State | 36 | 26th March 2008 03:38 PM |
| Comments on TL design, pls | Jorge | Multi-Way | 2 | 9th June 2005 03:05 PM |
| Comments on this design? | G | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 16th October 2003 05:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |