|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Has anyone tried using a low power MOSFET transistor with a Bipolar power transistor in a CFP stage. Any comments about its bias stability and the performance?
I wanted to use a Hitachi TO220 package MOSFET with a Bipolar output device like a 2SC3281/2SA1302 ( or similar ) . The idea being that I get a simple high input impedance stage with plenty of current drive capability in the output devices. Biasing will be like the usual transistor Vbe multiplier. Essentially like the circuit at: http://sound.westhost.com/project3a.htm Q5 and Q6 will be MOSFET's. Any suggestions? Thanks, Ashok.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
The difficulty here would be the high capacitance of the mosfet, which is loading the VAS. I think the more resistive loading presented by a BJT would be preferable here...
I suspect you may be able to raise the input impedance of the output stage by doing the opposite of what you plan... that is, use a BJT to drive the gate of a mosfet power transistor. Mosfets can easily handle the current, although you will sacrifice some efficiency since you won't be able to swing as close to the rails... But I believe this approach would probably yield an improved input impedance, allowing more linear operation of the VAS. Thoughts on the above, anyone? I haven't run the numbers on this one yet, but it's in my list of considerations for a new amplifier. The other issue, of course, will be stability... CFP isn't known for being the most stable beast. In this respect, perhaps someone with a bit more experience building mixed bjt/mosfet CFP stages can comment? For what it's worth, I've built a couple of fairly low powered mixed bjt/mosfet CFPs before, and did encounter some oscillation, but YMMV.
__________________
- Chad. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
For stability, try putting a bit of resistance in the emitter of the bjt to lower it's gain a bit. Worked for me at least.
__________________
Best-ever T/S parameter spreadsheet. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tml#post353269 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago, Il
|
It's not a CFP output, but if I remember right a Yorkville AP-1212 used for output, mj15022/23 driven by MOSFET driver(s) (MTW10N40 / MTW14P20). The VAS drive to the MOSFET's was not that more complicate then a standard amplifier.
It's been I while since I played with the Yorkville, so I could be mistaken. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Hi ashok,
Have you tried using SPICE to model the output stages you're considering? I've been using the freeware LTSpice from Linear Technology to evaluate power amp output stages, and I must say the results have shed a lot of light on the problems. Models for the On Semiconductor equivalent of the 3281 and 1302 are available. If you use International Rectifier MOSFETs, I can provide you with some models that aren't generally available on the net. I don't think I have any Hitachi models though. For evaluating stability, I pick a worst-case capacitive load. In my case, I used 2uF, a value that Bascom H. King has used for many years as a torture test for amps. As a result of all this, I ended up abandoning bipolar output stages altogether, as the output impedance is quite inductive at high frequencies. This causes a high-Q resonance with the capacitive load, which has horrible effects on the stability of the amp. Another poster mentioned high capacitance of the MOSFETs. The IRF 610 and IRF 9610 have a typica gate-to-drain capacitance of 15 pF at 25 Vdc. I was pleasantly surprised by how low this is. The gate-to-source capacitance is high, but the Miller effect at a gain of 1 mostly cancels this out. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
|
You guys are as confused as barking duck.......
The McCormick amps use Hatachi 2SJ76 and 2SK213. The gate to source turn on is low enough that you lose little voltage swing. The VAS boot strap circuit like in http://sound.westhost.com/project3a.htm would take care of this on the negative swings and it wouldn't take a nuclear physicist to design a circuit for the positive swings, batteries...... please! I would rather have the VAS stage clip than the output when you run out of voltage swing. All amps (FET BJT Tube) with loop negative feedback have inductive output Z. I won't state the obvious reason why. Put a snubber on it like the real designers do. A BJT will have the VAS stage see the load impedance divided by Hfe of the output stage. Most speaker loads are not very resistive, especially at cross over frequencies. The guy asking the question knows more than the people offering advice as is often the case. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Hi,
I am thinking to build a class-A amp that way. The main reason is that the FET diver transistors have a quadratic transfer function (in the ideal case). That means the bias current trough the output can be 1/4 of peak output current needed in stead of the usual 1/2 peak output current to keep the amp fully in class-A. The sum of quadrates (of bottom and top fet) will give a linear transfer function. And for those concerned about capacitive loading of the VAS: The input cap of a source follower is: C_in = C_gd + C_gs x (1-voltage gain) Since voltage gain is near unity the effective capacitance of C_gs is very small at the VAS. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
The phase angle depends on the source impedance seen by the output. With each base seeing about 10 ohms with respect to ground you should see 60 degrees at over 3 MHz.
X1 3 5 1 QSC3281 { } .SUBCKT QSC3281 1 2 3 * TERMINALS: C B E * 200 Volt 15 Amp SiNPN Power Transistor 12-03-1991 Q1 1 2 3 QPWR .67 Q2 1 4 3 QPWR .33 RBS 2 4 9.5 .MODEL QPWR NPN (IS=1.63P NF=1 BF=150 VAF=254 IKF=12 ISE=1.34N NE=2 + BR=4 NR=1 VAR=20 IKR=16.5 RE=22.1M RB=4 RBM=.4 IRB=5.556U RC=4.84M + CJE=481P VJE=.6 MJE=.3 CJC=312P VJC=.22 MJC=.2 TF=5.33N TR=204N) + XTB=1.5 PTF=120 XTF=1 ITF=9.6) .ENDS X2 6 8 2 QSA1302 { } .SUBCKT QSA1302 1 2 3 * TERMINALS: C B E * 200 Volt 15 Amp SiPNP Power Transistor 12-03-1991 Q1 1 2 3 QPWR .67 Q2 1 4 3 QPWR .33 RBS 2 4 9.5 .MODEL QPWR PNP (IS=1.63P NF=1 BF=130 VAF=254 IKF=11 ISE=1.34N NE=2 + BR=4 NR=1 VAR=20 IKR=16.5 RE=12.1M RB=4 RBM=.4 IRB=5.556U RC=4.84M + CJE=1.09N VJE=.6 MJE=.3 CJC=708P VJC=.22 MJC=.2 TF=5.33N TR=204N) + XTB=1.5 PTF=120 XTF=1 ITF=9.6) .ENDS R1 4 2 0.22 R2 1 4 0.22 V1 3 0 DC=50 R3 3 5 775 R4 5 0 10 V2 0 6 DC=50 V3 7 0 DC=0 AC=100 R5 4 7 100 R6 0 8 10 R7 8 6 775 .END |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Fred,
Thanks for posting that. I'm baffled about the difference. Here's the netlist that LTSpice is putting out. I also have 10 Ohm base resistors, and 0.33 Ohm emitter resistors, with a supply of +/- 56V. I'm still seeing 60 degrees at 300 kHz. I'm trying to attach the image, but it looks like it needs to be a URL? Andy ============================ * F:\Program Files\LTC\SwCADIII\My Circuits\PA_output.asc Q1 N008 N007 N006 0 Qmjl3281a Q2 N009 N004 N005 0 Qmjl1302a R1 N006 out 0.33 R2 out N005 0.33 R3 N007 N002 {Rbase} R4 N004 N003 {Rbase} V1 N002 N001 {Vbias} V2 N001 N003 {Vbias} V4 N008 0 56 V5 0 N009 56 V6 N001 0 {Voffset} I1 out 0 0 AC 1 .model NPN NPN .model PNP PNP .lib F:\Program Files\LTC\SwCADIII\lib\cmp\standard.bjt .param Vbias=0.56 .param Voffset = -0.0356 ;op .ac dec 100 1000 100e6 .param Rbase=10 .backanno .end ============================ Models from standard.bjt: .MODEL Qmjl1302a pnp( IS=5.35257e-14 BF=10000 NF=0.85 VAF=29.806 IKF=1 ISE=6.75503e-13 NE=1.13462 BR=0.1 NR=0.75 VAR=298.06 IKR=10 ISC=1e-16 NC=3.31217 RB=1.9617 IRB=0.1 RBM=1.9617 RE=0.0001 RC=0.185509 XTB=0.1 XTI=1 EG=1.05 CJE=1e-07 VJE=0.4 MJE=0.491105 TF=6.44974e-10 XTF=1000 VTF=2.05556 ITF=279.371 CJC=5e-10 VJC=0.400004 MJC=0.23 XCJC=1 FC=0.1 CJS=0 VJS=0.75 MJS=0.5 TR=1e-07 PTF=0 KF=0 AF=1 Vceo=200 Icrating=15 mfg=OnSemiconductor) .MODEL Qmjl3281a npn( IS=6.5498e-11 BF=139.247 NF=1.00176 VAF=46.776 IKF=10 ISE=7.75232e-12 NE=3.34341 BR=4.98985 NR=1.09511 VAR=4.32026 IKR=4.37516 ISC=3.25e-13 NC=3.96875 RB=11.988 IRB=0.111742 RBM=0.102914 RE=0.00127227 RC=0.209833 XTB=0.115253 XTI=1.03146 EG=1.11986 CJE=1e-07 VJE=0.4 MJE=0.450375 TF=7.04629e-10 XTF=1000 VTF=2.06045 ITF=41.8156 CJC=5e-10 VJC=0.4 MJC=0.85 XCJC=0.959922 FC=0.1 CJS=0 VJS=0.75 MJS=0.5 TR=1e-07 PTF=0 KF=0 AF=1 Vceo=200 Icrating=15 mfg=OnSemiconductor) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LME49810, LME49830 or LM4702? BiPolar or Mosfet output? | sendler | Chip Amps | 27 | 6th March 2009 03:42 AM |
| bipolar full vs semi complimentary output stage | wleediy | Solid State | 0 | 17th June 2007 03:35 PM |
| Bipolar output stage prefers capacitive or inductive load? | Paul W | Solid State | 14 | 7th October 2006 03:44 PM |
| Comparison between Bipolar transistors and MOSFET as output devices | raveenvijendren | Solid State | 4 | 17th November 2005 05:28 PM |
| Mosfet drive in Vas stage and use Bipolar output | YUTK | Solid State | 0 | 26th May 2005 06:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16356 seconds (78.79% PHP - 21.21% MySQL) with 11 queries |