|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Berlin, Germany
|
I'd like to chime in to Bob's questions (especially "What do you think is the biggest reason they have such superior distortion characteristics to vertical MOSFETs?").... albeit some aspects seem to covered already in the datasheets and appnotes, like:
Only N-Channel, thus quasi-comps or circlotrons. 175deg is a package limitation. The gate diode is a parasitic, the devices are true voltage controlled. - Klaus |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi Mark; it will be indeed very interesting experience to see and listen results of your work during a Burning Amp! But currently, we are species of different Universes, despite I've started from the same one; my career started in Tomsk Institute of Semiconductor Devices, it was (and is) one of flagmans of Russian Semiconductor Industry. At the same time I had a voluntary laboratory of electronic music where I was experimenting a lot deliberately creating distortions designing analog synthesizers and guitar effects. I did not think then that it is so hard to design and build a nice sounding power amp. I had several design then following fashions, some of them were fully complementary. But I was very surprised when people were saying that my class A+C amp sounded better than all complementary amps, I did not believe that! It had fair class A amp and couple of unbiased complementary transistors working in parallel. Class A amp supplied an output current through resistor, and drove bases of class C output stage. The whole thingy had a complex feedback, so switching from class A to class C was very smooth, and I used as fast as I could find then opamp in an inverting mode then. Anyway, I was thinking that I was cheating approximating a transfer function, and kept believing that properly biased class AB fully complementary amp is the best. Later I've discovered from Wireless World article that similar approach was patented and called Current Dumping, and the amp that used it was regarded well, even though I did not like that design, it was ugly, according to my preferences. Switching my career to software design, then to design of networked systems, I still followed audio design as a hobby, and was curious why tube amps are still though out, even though their measurements were worse. Thanks to Dr. Richard Bandler, the real Master of practical psychology in the field of subconscious perceptions, I finally realized what it is all about. And now I don't believe that complementary topologies can beat asymmetrical tube amps with class A semiconductor output stages, in terms of fooling imagination as if the sound is real. However, I would like to hear your amps, and get converted back. See you and your creations on BAF! Sincerely, Anatoliy Lisovskiy
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
The one and only
|
Quote:
my lifetime But of course that still leaves lots of possibilities.I think enhancement mode JFETs is the accurate description. I haven't seen significant gate current, but I haven't run them past 10 amps or so. I have a simple Class AB design with a little feedback, and I was very pleased with it. I plan to kick that out as a DIY project. Part of the lower distortion you see there is load line cancellation on that circuit - you'll notice that the dependence on Vds extends to a higher voltage range than the Mosfets we play with. Also there is the high transconductance of the part, which is on the order of 10S or so at the currents I run (<2A), so it responds well to a little degeneration. The temperature coefficient is a bit better than vertical Mosfets, and they bias up at about 1.4 V Vgs at a couple amps or so. Worst case improvements are about 1/2 the distortion of their Mosfet counterparts, and the linearity of the capacitance seems better, with flatter thd vs frequency curves. All in all, a significantly better part IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Berlin, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest
|
Quote:
So it would seem one of the key questions is do the SiC JFET advantages outweigh the disandvantage of having to use them in quasi-comp. for push-pull? You (or Nelson) are probably better able to answer that question than I am! |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
They are obviously not targeting the linear market. For linear applications, limiting these devices at 175 C is absurd, SiC can easily take 250 C junction temperature before even thinking about increasing the leakages.
For that, they need to choose another packaging technology. TO3 would be nice, but unfortunately copper and the SiC chip would not (thermally expansion wise) match. A special mounting preform is required, and that would be very expensive, adding to an already huge cost to process those SiC wafers. Nice devices, but I wouldn't hold my breath for something optimized for linear applications. Great for DIY enthusiast, but little hope for a slew of new, improved performance, designs. I'll check if I can get some, I can see them in a Pass type class A monster amp. Can you feel my HiFi oven singing and cooking french toast at the same time? |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SiC JFETS | revintage | Pass Labs | 15 | 27th August 2009 02:43 PM |
| JFETs for 5ma CCS? | PhopsonNY | Parts | 7 | 24th December 2008 03:55 AM |
| jfets for preamp | kzeprf22 | Solid State | 14 | 21st November 2008 02:35 PM |
| got a bag of 30 J201 JFETs, what can I do with them? | bikehorn | Solid State | 2 | 2nd June 2007 01:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12054 seconds (91.41% PHP - 8.59% MySQL) with 11 queries |