anatech said:
i wouldnt say actually
the 5800 series we imported at the time all had hand writen codes on each and every of the transistors regarding matching ....
but also at the same time we think tha adcom started to produce boards in the taiwan so the first problems started there ..... 5800 come in without any notes on the transistor ....indication that either matching was skiped fron default or skiped by mistake ....
the particula amps presented excesive ammounts of tem but otherwise seemed to work ok
voltage drop on the resistors actually was very diferent from transistor to transitor ...
then adcom made the same mistake by sending us again transistors from the box ( still have them ) and at the third time they send matched sets ...installed them tune and and let go till today ...
( nice to hear from you chris ....hope you are doing really well )
I'm probably going to tinker a bit with this unit (GFA-555-II), at the very least do the 22uF bypass on each main cap as suggested by DJK. His mod is using a Bennic NP, any reason why I shouldn't just go with a film cap, other than cost?
I'm also going to add another 30,000uF of computer grade capacitance, bringing total up to 90,000uF. Depending on the outcome of these two mods (if positive), I may even invest in a pair of 800VA toroids and further upgrade the PS.
I'm of a different opinion as to the sound quality, it is somewhat congested, so detail is poor, and the bass seems a bit uncontrolled. No contest compared to my Aragon 8008BB, but perhaps it is not a fair comparison. Bias and offset not tested yet.
Here is a free copy of the service manual, for those interested:
http://www.acousticpsychos.com/Files/
I'm also going to add another 30,000uF of computer grade capacitance, bringing total up to 90,000uF. Depending on the outcome of these two mods (if positive), I may even invest in a pair of 800VA toroids and further upgrade the PS.
I'm of a different opinion as to the sound quality, it is somewhat congested, so detail is poor, and the bass seems a bit uncontrolled. No contest compared to my Aragon 8008BB, but perhaps it is not a fair comparison. Bias and offset not tested yet.
Here is a free copy of the service manual, for those interested:
http://www.acousticpsychos.com/Files/
So you are going to replace the 4 OE 15,000 caps with 22,500 caps? or are you going to piggyback 4 7,500's?
If I were going to do that I might consider adding a soft start circuit, although I would be hesitant to haphazardly add 50% more capacitance to what should be an adequate supply without figuring out what part will fail, will it be the rectifier bridges?
If I were going to do that I might consider adding a soft start circuit, although I would be hesitant to haphazardly add 50% more capacitance to what should be an adequate supply without figuring out what part will fail, will it be the rectifier bridges?
Hi sakis,
We never did get any of those amps that didn't have matched outputs. I am in the habit of checking current sharing in everything I work on. That way I don't have avoidable failures to worry about. The customer would not know the difference between bad work and a assembly induced fault. Besides, out of warranty I can warn them to see if they want to fix that problem or not. Either way, I am not going to be at fault for something someone else is responsible for.
To be honest with you, I found that most mass production stuff used outputs from the same batches, it was the low production higher end stuff where matching seemed to be problematic. That's probably due to the lower quantities of parts bought, they didn't understand that they may have to match where someone like Yamaha or Sony wouldn't have those problems to begin with.
Hi DreadPirate,
Understand that as long as your supplies remain above the voltages you are putting out, you will not be clipping. Beyond that, I really don't see any reasons for increasing supply capacitances. Andrew and I disagree very strongly on this point.
I once worked on a large Bedini amplifier that had giant capacitors running from front panel to almost the rear panel. The inductance was so high that the 120 Hz ripple was extreme. Okay, so it played for some time after you turn it off. But that isn't how we generally use our amplifiers. This amp sounded much better with lower values of capacitance, but that did stand in the way of good ad copy!
-Chris
We never did get any of those amps that didn't have matched outputs. I am in the habit of checking current sharing in everything I work on. That way I don't have avoidable failures to worry about. The customer would not know the difference between bad work and a assembly induced fault. Besides, out of warranty I can warn them to see if they want to fix that problem or not. Either way, I am not going to be at fault for something someone else is responsible for.
To be honest with you, I found that most mass production stuff used outputs from the same batches, it was the low production higher end stuff where matching seemed to be problematic. That's probably due to the lower quantities of parts bought, they didn't understand that they may have to match where someone like Yamaha or Sony wouldn't have those problems to begin with.
A clear indication they are not matched at all, as you've pointed out.
Thank you! It's always nice to "speak" with you too. We have very similar struggles in the audio market.
Hi DreadPirate,
I wouldn't. That seems to be a popular way to stress the rectifiers for no gain. Think about why you think the extra capacitance will help. Are the filtered rails collapsing by chance? I happen to know first hand that they are not. What you are doing though is reducing the charge time and increasing the levels of peak current. That leads to higher I-R losses everywhere, and probably more HF energy being created in the rectifier section.
Understand that as long as your supplies remain above the voltages you are putting out, you will not be clipping. Beyond that, I really don't see any reasons for increasing supply capacitances. Andrew and I disagree very strongly on this point.
I once worked on a large Bedini amplifier that had giant capacitors running from front panel to almost the rear panel. The inductance was so high that the 120 Hz ripple was extreme. Okay, so it played for some time after you turn it off. But that isn't how we generally use our amplifiers. This amp sounded much better with lower values of capacitance, but that did stand in the way of good ad copy!
-Chris
Hi DreadPirate,
Have you checked the bias currents? The procedure involves running the amp hard until it's good and warm - hot. Then you allow it to cool for 1/2 ~ 1 hour until the bias settles in. Then you measure it. Same procedure if you change the bias current.
-Chris
That doesn't sound right at all. An Adcom should idle a little warm and heat up with the program material.
Have you checked the bias currents? The procedure involves running the amp hard until it's good and warm - hot. Then you allow it to cool for 1/2 ~ 1 hour until the bias settles in. Then you measure it. Same procedure if you change the bias current.
-Chris
I used to own the GFA-555 and am looking for a used GFA-555II. But some folks have told me to listen to the ADCOM 5500 with MOSFETS before I go "too far back in time." I used to have the 555II into ML CLSes until I stupidly replaced the ADCOM equipment with Krell MDA500s. I sold those when the PS caps dried out(as did a whole bunch of other caps in my KBL and my KSP64). Given the huge number of 555's out there and the age of those models, can anyone in this forum recommend a good source for electrolytic PS caps and polypropylene/mylar/etc. caps to change out old caps, as we get closer and closer to the audio signal path? I can solder and have done mods before. The 5500 has to really sound incredible for me to buy an amp without bridging mode...I now have Thiel CS5i's and they would really benefit from the high damping factor and massive power output of the 555 amps at their inherently low impedence. But I have always felt that the 555 amps were fitted with inadequate PS capacitance...and would double the Farads...esp. given all the extra room "to grow" in the ADCOM amps.
Hello all,
Does anyone have a schematic for the GFA555MkII? I've looked and looked...to no avail.
I want to reference a few component values and change out some caps. Thanks,
My email is joe85255@gmail.com.
Does anyone have a schematic for the GFA555MkII? I've looked and looked...to no avail.
I want to reference a few component values and change out some caps. Thanks,
My email is joe85255@gmail.com.
Hi all
I'm contemplating a 555-II rebuild. from a first glance, I noticed some differences from MK1 to MK2, mainly the servo amp in the input stage. I wonder if this makes the amp any better (I doubt it!).
I have schematics for both - if needed send me a line to yfurman at bezeqint dot net.
Cheers,
Yair
I'm contemplating a 555-II rebuild. from a first glance, I noticed some differences from MK1 to MK2, mainly the servo amp in the input stage. I wonder if this makes the amp any better (I doubt it!).
I have schematics for both - if needed send me a line to yfurman at bezeqint dot net.
Cheers,
Yair
hi all,
I modified my original 555 in late 80s. Mod was based on an article in The Audio Amateur.
I've lost all my TAA from years of moving around when I was younger. I would like to know exactly what I did (and reconstitute a good record of my beloved equipment), so does anyone know that exact article, and can help me locate a copy?
Without opening the amp cover, I believe it has 2 stacked toroidal transformers (instead of factory 1), and much higher PS capacitors (2x15,000 uF per channel), I also replaced with polyprolylene caps (Sidereal caps) and 1% metal-film resistors. Also involved changes in circuitry.
The amp sounded beautiful and still does today. Driving pair of Magnepan IIIa, pre-amp is Accuphase C-200.
After the mod I was interested in how it compare to some well-know high-priced power amp. I borrowed a Jeff Rowland and did A/B test. Well, Jeff Rowland still came out ahead, with more 'airiness', but for the money of 555 (and what I could really afford at that time), Adcom was good enough for me.
Anyway, I'd appreciate if someone can help me locate the TAA article. Thanks!
Charles
I modified my original 555 in late 80s. Mod was based on an article in The Audio Amateur.
I've lost all my TAA from years of moving around when I was younger. I would like to know exactly what I did (and reconstitute a good record of my beloved equipment), so does anyone know that exact article, and can help me locate a copy?
Without opening the amp cover, I believe it has 2 stacked toroidal transformers (instead of factory 1), and much higher PS capacitors (2x15,000 uF per channel), I also replaced with polyprolylene caps (Sidereal caps) and 1% metal-film resistors. Also involved changes in circuitry.
The amp sounded beautiful and still does today. Driving pair of Magnepan IIIa, pre-amp is Accuphase C-200.
After the mod I was interested in how it compare to some well-know high-priced power amp. I borrowed a Jeff Rowland and did A/B test. Well, Jeff Rowland still came out ahead, with more 'airiness', but for the money of 555 (and what I could really afford at that time), Adcom was good enough for me.
Anyway, I'd appreciate if someone can help me locate the TAA article. Thanks!
Charles
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.