Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th July 2009, 10:04 PM   #1
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Default JLH 100W L-MOS 2nd Life

I have this J.L.H. Mosfet Amp DIYed in the mid 80s. Its been stashed away since Duran Duran were making hits.

Its in great condition and has very good parts quality. I have found the schematic on the Web and noted the values on it. See it attached. *Q13 is drawn upside down, drain should go to -V.

After I have given it a look inside, I saw that C1 is bypassed (but there is a DC sensing plus time delay, working relay circuit at the output), R1 is 47k, R2 is 1k8, R18 is 27k, there is no L1,R10. Also there is only +/-60V both for drivers and output but with split bridges and filter caps from a common 300VA toroidal secondary. So it must be giving less power than spec.

Bad thing is that is giving 0.2% THD at 1W on 8R. I have found that Q1,Q2 are not 65V Vco BC546Bs on the actual boards but probably due to some mistake, 45V Vco BC550Cs. Those are not supposed to hold the DC (just 0.7V drop across the 5k6 loads) but the amp works. The grounding and noise are excellent. No hum bands and -130dB noise floor relative to 1V RMS 0dB. The offset is negligible on both channels and there is proper 100mA bias through the venerable power Hitachis.

My questions are:

1. Can the high THD be a function of the improper(?) BC550s? I will get some BC546s soon and disassemble the amp. Can there be any other reason to look for, if the THD does not improve?
2. Are there any expert suggestions on changing something for the better? The PCBs are nice green epoxy, maybe not changing the schematic but manipulating some values or doing some small scale easy changes?

Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: gif jlh100w.gif (16.0 KB, 1155 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 12:06 AM   #2
jaycee is offline jaycee  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
Definitely replace teh bc550's! I'd probably upgrade the MPSA43/MPSA93's to the MPSAW42/92's as they have a 1W package that dissipate a bit more heat.

I'd definitely replace the electrolytic capacitors as well... the PSU ones might really need it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 12:12 AM   #3
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Will do. I wonder how it works with over max Vco NPNs though... maybe due to the very low current. I run a sim for the first and second stage including the feedback to the tail Njfet CCs gate and it actually confirmed the low voltage drops. They may very well be pushed I guess. Do you have any experience with this John Linsley Hood design and its proper performance?

Here I found the original if it rings a bell to UK guys mainly
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 10:15 AM   #4
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
that schematic says V mosfet.
But the output devices that JLH specified are Lateral devices.
JLH published a number of variations of this Lateral FET amplifier.

The later ones were called 80W amplifiers.

JLH was a brilliant designer.
I hold him in high esteem.

Search under his name John Linsley Hood and you will find many of his designs of this Forum.

Q6 needs to be changed to a PNP type and oriented to place the VR on the BE side of the multiplier.

This early circuit could be updated to the very similar 80W version which is still made with minor modifications by Williams Audio?
I doubt you will want to copy the 4u7//4u7F and the very high resistor values used in the NFB leg.
Note the lack of Cdom (Miller comp cap), a very British way of designing amplifiers.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 10:57 AM   #5
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Hello Andrew. Thanks.

Is the high THD indeed coming from the false use of BC550s in the particular build?

You mean the one with the 150k Rf so to use polyprop 10uF for the DC/AC cap in the feedback as it was suggested to JLH by Bobken?
The current one has feedback there though (22k) and I think it helps the situation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 12:20 PM   #6
forr is offline forr  France
diyAudio Member
 
forr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
Hi AndrewT
---JLH published a number of variations of this Lateral FET amplifier.---

This one is quite different from the other JLH Mosfet Designs published later and which had a Mos VAS.
Here there is positive feedback around the NFB loop. To me, the most intriguing design of his author.
I built it around the date of publication. I can't say much about the sound, but when first trying it I was very surprised by its extremly low DC offset, less than 1 mV. I have to state that I matched the pairs and did not use the 470 Ohm DC balancing pot at the LTP.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 01:32 PM   #7
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
I measure 0.9mV and 1mV DC offset, and it has to be trimmed since the 80s!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 01:59 PM   #8
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally posted by forr
Hi AndrewT
---JLH published a number of variations of this Lateral FET amplifier.---

This one is quite different from the other JLH Mosfet Designs published later and which had a Mos VAS.
I can see many similarities between this and JLH's other versions.
So much so that if it had not been identified as a JLH many who know his work would guess it as one of his designs.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 02:03 PM   #9
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
I just got 4XBC546Bs with hfe between 260-330. But I also pulled out old Philips ones with hfe between 80-110. What would be best to try? I guess that the old design was tested with lowish hfe 447s of that era.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2009, 02:08 PM   #10
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I would not use low hFE devices around the front end of any power amplifier.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
for the life of me CarlyBoy Tubes / Valves 5 30th January 2008 09:06 AM
The DIY Life DJ Exprice Everything Else 11 25th December 2006 06:38 PM
Evolve Amps 100W+100W Stuff 4 Sale WALTER BURKHARD Swap Meet 4 8th June 2005 10:57 AM
Eti-480 100w Amp Help Please jacquesl Solid State 24 27th February 2005 07:26 AM
Another A-75 comes to life BobEllis Pass Labs 13 18th February 2004 12:00 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Page generated in 0.17710 seconds (55.73% PHP - 44.27% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio