|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
First time doing this kind of things, so I'm quite scarely cat.
Bought this faulty NAD 3020i (3225PE actually, but same board and schematics), owner claimed only one channel working when playing CD and phono + possibly the whole preamp is out. I don't consider something inside glowing and smoking as "one channel working" as it would take a lot of guts to continue operation. Maybe the other channel is working, how'd I know. Garage sales integrity is low in my country. The one thing that was glowing was Q409 (BD139), which I saw burn mark before powering up. After the smoking the burn mark became bigger and it cracked so I'm pretty sure it's dead. I've removed the transistor in question (marked with red cross) and is going to get a replacement. Now, question is, is it safe to turn on the amp so that I can check the rest of the amp? Also, if I replaced the transistor, would the new transistor fail like the old one due to unknown reason, in which case how do I check for that? R443 was set at 25.5ohms, while in the other channel it was 24.5ohms, could a wrong biasing caused the eventual failure of this transistor? And R445 (also marked with a cross) looks to have some kind of burn mark though I'm not sure if it was glowing. Given the schematics, would it have glown (to coin a term)? Attached is part of the schematics:
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
Dead just because it's cracked and smoking? Are you not rushing to conclusions? It is actually quite unlikely it's the only device blown. The drivers and outputs may not show cracks and a glow but have likely moved to a better place too. Just check all semis on the board with a diode tester and suspicious looking resistors with an ohmmeter. And once you've replaced all the dead bodies make sure you power up carefully - through current limiting resistors or a lightbulb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
We can say this is within the 5% tolerance factor. In audio many times even a difference of 20% or more in telrance can be quite normal and good working. Quote:
And what you should do first. Then post back and tell more. Surely we have many guys that knows NAD 3020i in this forum. I have read plenty of topics about this nice old CLASSICAL amplifier. regars Lineup
__________________
lineup |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
This thing looks like it has been repaired before, albeit shabbily. At least one other transistor has been replaced (and it is green-color, strange), and this broken one had been replaced from the original ST part to something that doesn't even have a brand on it. So I'm not surprised it failed again, but suspect something might be causing it to fail. Thanks for the suggestion of testing all the parts to make sure. They're all still on the PCB but I'll try my best at measuring. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
If it looks as been repaced before
then there might be another problem that cause this damage. Repeatedly. Look for any sign of bad around that transistor. Resistors, transistors ... etc.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
That transistor is the bias control transistor. If that's smoked you can guarantee the output transistors and drivers are smoked too. This has probably, in turn, smoked the bias device.
So, you are looking at a replacement for the outputs Q415/417, drivers Q411/Q413. Which transistor is the green one? I bet it is the 2SB649. You would be best pulling ALL transistors in the channel and testing them out of circuit. Similarly test the resistors and diodes. DO NOT turn the amp on with this transistor removed! If the outputs and drivers arent dead yet they WILL be with a large bang if you do this! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
You're so right about that!
![]() I measured the above 4 mentioned trans in circuit and they're all shorted. And the green one is indeed 2SB649. Guess I'll be pulling out everything around that 5 dead trans to check for collateral damage. That means over 20. jaycee you really know this amp! Why is the 2SB649 green? It's on the other channel actually so I'm pulling out at least the trans to check just in case. And out of the 4 dead MJ2955, 2N3055, 2SD669A, and 2SD649A, Farnell only has MJ2955. And since I'm going to pull out those in the right channel too I might as well replace them all one shot. Since Farnell has free delivery over $30 in my country and the trans cost max ~$3 a piece. Any replacement for those? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
PNP transistors from that kinda of era were often made in green casings.
I dont really know the amp, just how to read a schematic For the MJ2955/2N3055 you can also use MJ15003/4, or MJ15024/5. The 2SB649/2SD669's could be tricky. I think they are discontinued. Fairchild's KSA1220A/KSC2690A look like good replacements. Unfortunately Farnell dont seem to carry them. MJE15032/3 might work but they are larger TO-220 devices and aren't as fast. Watch out for fake transistors if you shop elsewhere, especially the 649/669's. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
BD139 and 140 would work in a pinch if you can't find the proper Jap driver transistors. The ratings are fine, they will be a little slower (but that may not make any difference). The only 649/669's you'll ever find are fakes, you'd have to replace them with something current production to get real ones.
Any TO-3 audio output pair in production (and a lot of obsolete types) will replace and upgrade the 2N3055/2955. Even if you used 3055's, with newer devices the outputs need to be fit with 10 to 33 ohm resistors in series with the base because the original circuit lacked emitter resistors. This warning is well documented in this forum. Older 3055's had high enough internal resistance not to need them, but new ones are "better". |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where the sky loves the sea
|
I repaired a NAD receiver with a similar amp circuit. The lack of emitter resistors on the outputs (Q415, Q417) makes this design susceptible to thermal runaway. The outputs runaway and blow, taking the drivers (Q411, Q413) and the bias (Q409) transistors out too.
My fix was 0R33 (5W) in series with the emitters of Q415,Q417 and 6R8 in series with the bases. Apply the same fix to the channel that's still working, it is just a matter of time until it goes up in smoke too. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY Car Repair | avatar307 | The Lounge | 6 | 22nd May 2011 10:19 PM |
| nad 3020i harsh sound | mad_z | Solid State | 14 | 24th August 2007 04:45 PM |
| NAD 3020i Hum | otherside | Solid State | 7 | 27th July 2006 07:08 PM |
| Stock NAD 3020i Upgrade path. | dlarkin_dc | Solid State | 2 | 22nd April 2002 06:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13230 seconds (82.63% PHP - 17.37% MySQL) with 10 queries |