Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th September 2002, 07:24 PM   #101
jcarr is offline jcarr  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Artnyos:

>The circuit is complicated enough as it is now; and more parts complicate stability, lengthen signal paths (and complicate ground current return paths which are critical) and make PCB layout more difficult.<

You are right, I do tend to ignore issues of complexity and difficulty when designing circuits and pcb layouts.

But a circuit wouldn't be fun if it didn't present a worthy challenge ;-).

regards, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 07:56 PM   #102
artnyos is offline artnyos  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default PCBs

Quote:
I do tend to ignore issues of complexity and difficulty when designing circuits and pcb layouts.
I noticed..... PCB layout is a little more complicated when the parts are actually on the board.

I got tied of 3Dcircuits when doing mods on circuit developement on telcom boards using SMT parts. I have done a few under a microscope. I try to do point to point with the parts in one plane. Much easier to measure, fix, or modify. But as they say, "Whatever floats your boat."

Art
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 08:13 PM   #103
artnyos is offline artnyos  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default For Example

Sulzer type regulator. Veiw of positive half. Negative regulator half not finished.

Art
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sulzer2002reg.jpg (38.2 KB, 2257 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2002, 04:36 PM   #104
ALW is offline ALW  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Default Push pull

[QUOTE]ALW Andy: Looking at the schematic that you posted on the first page of this thread, how about doing a version of your regulator with a push-pull output?[QUOTE]

The schematic I'm working with is closer to that at the top of p6.

I don't feel PP offers any great benefits, and brings with it extra complication. For the power levels we're talking about for preamps, the reg. o/p can always be pre-loaded with a resistive load, in order to provide some current sinking capability.

I've used this scheme in a number of apps.

A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2002, 01:40 PM   #105
artnyos is offline artnyos  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default Sulzer type regulator

http://hitechnetworks.net/bwaldron/a..._regulator.htm

Art
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th November 2002, 09:11 PM   #106
jwb is offline jwb  
diyAudio Member
 
jwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, USA
Send a message via AIM to jwb
This is probably the most informative and important thread on the whole of diyaudio.com. Thanks for so much great information.

My question is what to do about 5V and 3.3V supplies. If I need e.g. 5.5V for the analog side of a DAC, I can't use any of these designs that include LM329, because that is a 6.9V reference. If I feed the output of a Sulzer regulator into a regulator such as LT1962, will the LT1962 simply add back in a bunch of noise? How much noise do standard regulators generate internally?

I realize that a 5V supply filter was discussed in the very first page of this thread, but it doesn't answer the question of how to apply the Sulzer or similar regulator to a logic-level supply.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2002, 06:23 AM   #107
ALW is offline ALW  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Default The 5V logic supply

Here's my solution...

Jung reg, THS4271 op-amp (3nV/rt Hz, 1000V/us, 1.4GHz GBW!), TL431 set to it's reference voltage of 2.5V.

THS4222 could be promising for 3.3V, but is noisier @ 13nV/rt Hz.

A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2002, 03:04 PM   #108
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Has someone tried made a sulzer type rugulator with high speed comparator (like ad8561) ?
I guess they much faster than opamps, but have lower gain and i do not know about noise voltage.

Have a nice day,

borisov57
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2002, 09:49 PM   #109
Optical is offline Optical  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Default Re: Sulzer type regulator

Quote:
Originally posted by artnyos
http://hitechnetworks.net/bwaldron/a..._regulator.htm

Art
how much current can be constantly drawn from one of these supplies??
Also i cant find those transistors in my area, will any low noise NPN/PNP pair work?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2003, 04:14 PM   #110
jwb is offline jwb  
diyAudio Member
 
jwb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, USA
Send a message via AIM to jwb
Voltage regulators ... they always come up in every project! Here's the thing:

1) Building yet another DAC
2) Some logic is 3.3V
3) Some logic is 5V
4) The analog side of the DAC needs ??
5) The clock also needs 9V

So I'm in the position where I need 3.3V, 5V, and 9V regulators, where the 9V needs to be quiet out to the clock speed of ... 24.576MHz. I like these Sulzer and Jung regulators designs, but I like the Sulzer better because it runs from the bulk supply, not the regulated supply. This allows me to run all the opamps from +15V bulk, instead of trying to find a good opamp that can run from a 3.3V single supply.

For the 9V supply, I can easily use the bog standard Sulzer with LM329 reference. To get the bandwidth I want I could go with AD797, it has serious specs. The problem I see in the Sulzer schematic is the huge AC feedback capacitor. Why 4.7uF? This rolls off the feedback at a very low frequency. The 797 has plenty of open-loop gain left to burn at 1MHz, and the closed-loop gain of the regulator would be only 2.3, so why not use 100pF for the AC feedback? Am I looking at the wrong impedance spec on the capacitors?

For the 3.3V and 5V regulators I believe I will use the solution ALW posted above. Thanks for the tip on the THS4271.

-jwb
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reducing voltage rtill Solid State 28 16th January 2009 01:45 PM
Reducing regulator noise. Predator864 Power Supplies 3 23rd March 2008 07:26 PM
Low Noise 3 Leg Voltage Regulators dsavitsk Parts 2 10th July 2007 02:49 AM
Reducing PSU Voltage hernanstafe Parts 1 9th March 2007 05:14 PM
Best way of reducing heater voltage? showdown Tubes / Valves 14 20th July 2006 07:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Page generated in 0.09463692 seconds (85.70% PHP - 14.30% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio