Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th September 2002, 04:18 PM   #91
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
Wink 5 volt part

The AD 823 is supposed to be a quite good sounding op amp and the specs are still good at +5 volts. Its a dual though and needs a buffer follower before the pass transistor, which I believe you have in your design. It would be on the top of my list. You could solder a SMT part on a component header to translate dual SMT to single DIP for testing. I bet you wish I had brought all this up before you started! I will email you on where to send my consulting fees. I am getting samples for everything I ask for in about 3 or 4 days including some $30 voltage references. I had to buy some LT parts but they were not too bad. If you only knew the stuff I am holding back........ Sure hope I am not helping any of your competitors for the ultimate regulator board design.........

H.H.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2002, 05:07 PM   #92
ALW is offline ALW  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Default Road to somewhere

> Its a dual though and needs a buffer follower before the pass transistor, which I believe you have in your design.

Yep, the board can be used without it for some small price reduction, but I like the isolation it provides to the op-amp o/p stage and it allows some serious high current versions to be built.

An important point to note is the inefficiency of this circuit at low o/p currents - the op-amp / buffer transistor has to sink all the unwanted drive current from the base of the pass device, some care in operating criteria needs to be observed. I have some cooked looking 2N2907's on some early boards where I'd got a bit excited with the source current!

>I bet you wish I had brought all this up before you started!

One can spend so long designing that you never get to an end result though, I'm so pleased with the sonic results I'm getting, I'm not overtly bothered. I am wondering though whether to make the next PCB, originally intended to be a negative version, dual purpose - some careful thought and one board may be able to fulfil both roles with some different stuffing and a couple of simple links (damn - there's another good idea for the competition!)

>I will email you on where to send my consulting fees.

Likewise

>I am getting samples for everything I ask for in about 3 or 4 days including some $30 voltage references.

Hmm, location or identity I wonder - will have to try again, different ID...

>If you only knew the stuff I am holding back........

I took the decision that this was a fairly easy option to a big improvement, at sensible cost, for all areas of my system. My next design would almost definitely be discrete, since op-amps are just too limiting (CF possibly being an exception). That design has somehow morphed into a headphone amp now though, whilst I learn more about discrete amp design

>Sure hope I am not helping any of your competitors for the ultimate regulator board design.........

I don't really consider myself to be in competition, I'm too much of a philanthropist for that, but do intend to make a small sum to cover investment and future releases I wouldn't post here if I had any business sense.

If you want to make money from this, you have to sell complete products - I'm too busy for that at present (damn again - more good advice for others to capitalise on). See what I mean, all the business acumen of goldfish...

A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2002, 07:03 PM   #93
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
Talking Hmm, location or identity I wonder

I like to think it is my personel charm.........

"since op-amps are just too limiting"

Half the circuit is discrete now. It takes some pretty serious design to get the PSRR, Gain bandwidth product, and distortion with a discreet design. You had better be a top notch PCB designer too, since the board parasitics will eat you alive for high speed analog design. Plus there is the issue of building and testing. The guys designing op amps are more talented than the majority of high end designers out there. Maybe an op amp is and pretty good choice for the error amp after all. With a buffer
it is not swinging much current and as an error amp it isn't swinging much voltage. A pretty sweet job for any amplifier.

H.H.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg goldfish.jpg (8.1 KB, 2064 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2002, 07:38 PM   #94
ALW is offline ALW  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Default Charms

Seems mine work too, just a little slower than yours...

....I got a parcel today )))

More after the weekend

A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 05:42 PM   #95
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Earth
if i power the whole circuit with 12 volts from a battery. is it possible that i utilize ad825 for the 5 volts configuration without dropping the voltage via the 22.1 ohm resistor. ad848 is hard to source out
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 06:05 PM   #96
artnyos is offline artnyos  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default AD825

NO

A 5 volt version has been just discussed in this thread.

Which schematic are you refering to?

Go to http://products.analog.com/products/...?product=AD825 and read the data sheet.

Everyone , please read the whole thread and provide enough information in your question to answer it in one shot. People are less likely to answer if they have go back and forth for 5 or 6 post to figure out what you are asking.

Art
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 06:13 PM   #97
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
ALW Andy: Looking at the schematic that you posted on the first page of this thread, how about doing a version of your regulator with a push-pull output? Should be interesting, and I wouldn't be surprised if it sounds even better.

regards, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 06:30 PM   #98
artnyos is offline artnyos  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default Push pull

Since the load is almost pulling (in every application I can think of) , I don't see the point. Tthe addition of emmiter resistors for bias stability wound degrade the output impedance. Preloading or a more Class A bias with a resistor load would make more sense for improvements in Ft, Hfe, and Zout.

Art
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 06:39 PM   #99
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Well, I've done a rather similar vreg circuit in the past, and when I changed to a P-P output, I felt that the sound was more cohesive and retained a given level of resolution better when reproducing densely orchestrated music. Your experience, of course, may be different.

regards, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2002, 06:58 PM   #100
artnyos is offline artnyos  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Default Push Pull

There is more than one path up the mountain. Emitter resistors can add high frequency stability. The possible increased bias for a push pull verses non preloaded single ended follower can lower output Z. They are many variables. The circuit is complicated enough as it is now; and more parts complicate stability, lengthen signal paths (and complicate ground current return paths which are critical) and make PCB layout more difficult. One would have to get down to particular circuit details to really compare theory and results. Why not post a schematic if interest is high.

Art
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reducing voltage rtill Solid State 28 16th January 2009 02:45 PM
Reducing regulator noise. Predator864 Power Supplies 3 23rd March 2008 08:26 PM
Low Noise 3 Leg Voltage Regulators dsavitsk Parts 2 10th July 2007 03:49 AM
Reducing PSU Voltage hernanstafe Parts 1 9th March 2007 06:14 PM
Best way of reducing heater voltage? showdown Tubes / Valves 14 20th July 2006 08:15 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 PM.

Page generated in 0.13402 seconds (79.47% PHP - 20.53% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio