|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dresden
|
Hi there,
although I browse a lot through this forum and learned quite a bit reading the posts, I never posted very much myself. However, I would like to ask for your opinion of my suggestion of a single-ended tube-Mosfet follower, before I think about transferring it from SPICE into the real world. The idea is based on a 2007 publication in the tubecad journal and is based on three components: A triode, a power mosfet and a current source. The current source is the load for the mosfet and isolates it from the unavoidable ripple of the high current power supply (an idea that Andrea Ciuffoli and Stephen Moore implemented). The voltage for the triode will be smoothed carefully through a C-L-C filter. The ECC88 and the IRFP240 form a 100% feedback loop. The signal appears at the 1k anode resistor. The ECC88 plate impedance is 2.6k. Hence the impedance to drive the gate plus the Miller capacitance of the IRFP240 is around 720 ohms. From the drain the signal is fed back into the ECC88 cathode plus it is fed into the output capacitor. The triode is supposed to control the whole circuitry. According to the SPICE simulation the amplifier should be able to deliver 20W into a 4 ohm speaker. Critical aspects: The drain follower topology may induce distortion There is a feedback loop. Driving the Mosfet with the rather high tube impedance may be critical There is an electrolyte output capacitor Any comment is greatly appreciated Cheers KlausB |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I see several problems. First the gate voltage needed for that
bottom mosfet will varry from device to device and also on how hot it gets so it needs to be done with a pot. Then the current source may have a problem. That 100 ohm resistor from the 15v supply will let the transistor and diode pull ~110 ma and I believe that diode is only rated at 100ma change it to something like 5k. Or better still look at how Nelson does these 2 things in his ZEN amplifier! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Good idea, but why don't let the tube to provide some voltage gain instead of requiring higher swing from the preceding device?
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
KlausB,
not bad, coming up with something like that right away. What is the preceding stage? I don`t find those critical aspects especially bothersome (OK, some elaboration would be needed here). Crss=160pF Ciss=1275pF I would try to modify it in this manner: |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Lumba, in the circuite you posted you left out a voltage source
for the irf240 to set it's drain at 15v. Without this the device is 100% off. But back to the first circuite what advantage does this have over a standard mosfet power follower other than higher input impedience? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
woody,
you are entirely right, expectantly, IRF240 is now at least biased correctly. Due to a tight collaboration, the tube linearizes the FET and puts its characteristic on the output stage. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
Wavebourn,
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I thought an output stage should not have a feedback?
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm
|
Wavebourn,
I really like when you ask legitimate questions, I will answer later. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F* amp VS Single Ended DHT tube amp | xecluded | Pass Labs | 15 | 11th August 2009 07:59 PM |
| Tube-Mosfet Single-Ended Amplifier! | Matthewong | Solid State | 15 | 2nd October 2008 05:13 AM |
| WTB: Single Ended tube amp | bepatient | Swap Meet | 4 | 29th January 2006 08:11 AM |
| single ended mosfet amp | KlausB | Solid State | 11 | 26th February 2004 07:47 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10655 seconds (79.35% PHP - 20.65% MySQL) with 11 queries |