Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th April 2009, 07:25 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holland
Question MT200 replacements for MJ15003 and MJ15004

Hello everybody.

First of all, sorry for my bad english.

I have a question and hope somebody can help me.

I want to rebuild the power amplifier of my good old Dynacord PowerMate 600 powermixer in an 19" housing.
This amplifier uses 2 MJ15003 and 2 MJ15004 (TO-3) output devices for each channel.

Due to mounting problems i would use MT200 (i think TO-247/TO-264 does'nt provide enough disipation power?) transistors. Can anybody tells me which one is the best (or the closest)
replacement for the MJ15003 and MJ15004 transistors?

If neccesary, i can post the schematic of the PowerMate 600.
Thanks in advance!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 04:36 AM   #2
jaycee is offline jaycee  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
MT200 is pretty much a Sanken format. They seem to be the only ones still making such transistors.

The problem is, all such transistors are going to have pretty high fT which will not be stable in an amp designed for MJ15003/4. Also, they won't be as good as TO-3 for dissipating heat.

If a 19" amp is what you want, and you are prepared to build, maybe you would be better to build something more recent, perhaps recycling some parts (transformer for example) from the Dynacord?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:03 PM   #3
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
The 250W 20A To3 200degC BJTs (MJ15003/4) are very robust.
I don't think any other BJT can beat their spec.

Plastic packaged devices cannot compete.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:11 PM   #4
wg_ski is offline wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by AndrewT
The 250W 20A To3 200degC BJTs (MJ15003/4) are very robust.
I don't think any other BJT can beat their spec.

Plastic packaged devices cannot compete.
So use three instead of two. It sounds like you're changing the heat sinking arrangement anyway if you're contemplating changing T0-3 to MT200. If you use three T0-264's, you can pretty much pick your poison.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:20 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holland
Everybody thanks for his/her answer!

I appriciate this. 6 Transistors in stead of 4 is a very good idea, but are the drivers (MJ15030 and 31) "strong" enough to "feed" an extra transistor? Can anybody tells me which one i can use the best? MJL transistors or something like that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:26 PM   #6
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
if you go for 200W plastic devices then I'd suggest you double the number of devices in the output stage.

Blame it on temperature de-rated SOAR.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:30 PM   #7
wg_ski is offline wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
MJL21193/4 will have characteristics and beavior more similar to the original MJ's than anything else you can get in a plastic package. And three will cost less than two Sanken MT200's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:32 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Holland
That is great news because these one's are not so hard to get!

Maybe for future plans: do you know a good plastic case replacement for an MJ15022 and MJ15023 transistor? These are used in an PowerMate 1000.

Maybe the MJL21195 and MJL21196?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 01:35 PM   #9
wg_ski is offline wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
As for the drivers, the load will actually be easier on them with three MJLs. Beta droop in the outputs will be less. At 20A each, the beta of the MJ's will be down to 5 or 10. At 13A in each MLJ, it's still up above 12. Result - less current required from the drivers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2009, 02:25 PM   #10
wg_ski is offline wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by Audio Johnny
Maybe for future plans: do you know a good plastic case replacement for an MJ15022 and MJ15023 transistor? These are used in an PowerMate 1000.

Same thing applies. Bump up the size of the output stage by 50% going from TO-3 to TO-264. The 15022 is a higher voltage part than the 15003, but thermally similar.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 each of MJ15003/MJ15004 Stu Swap Meet 2 27th April 2008 08:34 AM
MJ15003/MJ15004 100mS SOA Donk Solid State 2 15th January 2008 04:37 PM
MJ15003's and MJ15004's For Sale mbonham Swap Meet 5 7th December 2006 10:13 PM
Mj15003 Mj15004 jackinnj Swap Meet 0 29th June 2003 10:19 PM
Leach Amp: Matching MJ15003 and MJ15004 swede Solid State 10 26th December 2001 06:37 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Page generated in 0.10425 seconds (76.49% PHP - 23.51% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio