Differential Input Stage - Question
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
thylantyr
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
Differential Input Stage - Question

The attached picture is the Holton
Av800 input stage. I'm trying
to avoid using 33uf electrolytic
capacitors on the input and instead
I would like to use 1uf - 5uf
polypropylene capacitors
(or polyester film).

Guessing ----- ------
To achieve the same high pass filter,
can I increase R2 and R7 from
4.7k to 47k and replace the
33uf capacitors to 3.3uf capacitors for
C1 and C4 ?

I'm not sure how to modify the
differential input stage too allow
for a smaller C1 and C4.

Any tips?
Attached Images
 av800_input_stage.jpg (26.3 KB, 452 views)

 22nd April 2003, 06:35 AM #2 jan.didden   diyAudio Member     Join Date: May 2002 Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE Long tailed pair Your reasoning is correct, but the problem is the input imp of the stage, which is the impedance looking into the base // to R3 which is about 4.7k for the +input. Increasing R2 will attenuate the input signal here 10x, which you don't want. There is something else that catches the eye here: the -input impedance is much higher, because the bottom end of R6 is bootstrapped by the feedback. That means that the attenuation of R2 to R3 is quite different from that of R7 to R6. As a result, the input sensitivities and input impedances of thee two inputs are quite different. I think C4 can be made much less without any problems: it feeds a much higher impedance.
 22nd April 2003, 08:10 AM #3 supa-roo   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: aust If you reduce the size of the 33uF caps to much, you will increase you low frequency roll off, as well as the increased attenuation previously mentioned. there only there to block DC so if your pre-amp etc, has caps on its ouput, you could delete them off your schematic
 22nd April 2003, 12:41 PM #4 audioPT   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Right here I agree: No caps! Since the preamp have.... Pedro Martins
 22nd April 2003, 03:18 PM #5 thylantyr   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Mars If I use an unbalanced audio signal and remove the 33uf input capacitors, would it be ok to short the -input to the printed circuit board ground plane and only use +input ? I'll be laying out a board soon, do you have any ideas for input stage modifications that I could incorporate into the design ?
carlmart
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
Quote:
 Originally posted by thylantyr If I use an unbalanced audio signal and remove the 33uf input capacitors, would it be ok to short the -input to the printed circuit board ground plane and only use +input ?

That is certainly the way to do it with any unbalanced input feeding a differential input. You can also improve things by using a good cap on that feedback to ground. A Black Gate for low voltage won't be expensive and may be a benefit.

Also beware how you route your grounds and do use a star.

Carlos

thylantyr
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
To help me understand how this works, I drew
a block diagram of the input stage using
an op-amp to represent the amplifier and I
removed the input capacitors.

Is this drawing somewhat correct ?

What is the purpose of the 220uf and 0.1uf capacitor?

This type of configuration confuses me
Attached Images
 av800_simple.jpg (11.0 KB, 302 views)

 23rd April 2003, 05:51 AM #8 thylantyr   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Mars Homework is for the birds But, after searching all day, I found a reference to that last schematic I posted...... figure 10 on this website has the circuit, but without the caps. http://www.dself.demon.co.uk/balanced.htm The website claims that this configuration is to allow gain without affecting CMRR..... The differential input impedance is lower on the "cold" leg and higher on the "hot" leg.., but common mode input impedance remains the same for both inputs..... \\\\\\\\ ///////////// So What do the caps do ? The 220uf in parallel with 0.1 uf in the previous picture posted ? My head hurts
 23rd April 2003, 01:33 PM #9 supa-roo   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: aust on the original schematic, r9 and the 2 caps mentioned make up part of the feed back circuit, they would from what i can see attenuate the signal, before the differential pair.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post guzzler Digital Source 29 19th December 2006 05:32 PM maudio Solid State 15 11th October 2006 02:16 AM Dynsdale Tubes / Valves 8 3rd September 2005 07:29 PM xuesong Solid State 3 27th December 2004 02:08 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34 PM.