|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
With 0r1 Re and 2r2 base stopper the optimum bias current is 180...190mA |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
This is the output stage linearity in relation with various values of Re, for a single output pairs (ref D. Self)
Of course, the figure is much more better as the number of pairs is increased, but the 0r1 re value is always better if the Vbe variation among output BJTs is in the range of 1..2mV Re=0r47 is only for the cases when no OPS BJT matching is performed |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
Quote:
Sajti |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
Quote:
And the 0R1 emitter resistor gives less protection against thermal runaway. Sajti |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
You can't ... You should measure the minimum distortion vs bias current. The numbers posted above are from measurements and not from theory. |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Roender,
I had not forgotten about the internal part of Re nor the effect that Rb has on it. Your and others' earlier lessons are well remembered. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vác, Hungary
|
First, I will try to reduce the number of the output devices, to reduce the capacitances, and get smaller size. I think that 4pairs for each amplifier module (8pairs for 900W/2ohms)will be enough. The peak current will be 8A for each pairs, 1ohm load for each module, with 32Vpeak output.
I put together some test circuit to measure the bias. 2pairs of FJL4X15 with 0.1ohm resistors, driven by MJE15032/33 biased to 80mA, predrivers are BC639/640 with 8mA. I use two transistors bias circuit with BD139/140. The heatsink is about half sized I planned for one module. The bias looks overcompensated. 26mV with hot heatsink, and if I cool down the heatsink it increase up to 38-40mV Sajti |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Just checking something here...
Can I use an MJL21193/21194 to replace MJ15003/15004's They only have a rating of 140V and wouldnt mind bumping it up to 250V. I would obviously have to compensate for a slightly lower W rating though... Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
In reality, in audio apps the MJ and MJL handle the same power. You just can't run the temp as high with the plastic pacakge. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mjl21193/94 indestructable?? | mikefromaus | Solid State | 2 | 16th January 2008 02:34 PM |
| FS: MJL21193 and MJL21194 - new | zener_diode | Swap Meet | 9 | 27th December 2007 03:36 AM |
| MJL21193/21194s | N-Channel | Swap Meet | 1 | 18th September 2005 03:04 AM |
| MJL21193 and MJL21194 | HuntTheShunt | Parts | 1 | 5th December 2004 12:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |