Is setting an alps volume pot to the full position the same as bypassing? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th February 2009, 09:49 PM   #1
boidos is offline boidos  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Send a message via MSN to boidos
Default Is setting an alps volume pot to the full position the same as bypassing?

Hi All,
I am looking to use some shunt stepped attenuators with my class d amps.
Is setting its alps volume pot to the full position effectively the same as bypassing it? Or should I be removing it for maximum quality sound?

thanks!
Boyd
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2009, 10:10 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mountain View, California
Not quite exactly the same, but it should be good enough for most practical purposes. Try it first.

The long answer:
The pot, set to maximum, will present a load equal to its maximum resistance value to the source of any signal. At the simplest analysis, this will still result in a small attenuation, dependant upon the impedance of that source. Since the alps pot is probably 10's or maybe 100's of kOhm, and the source impedance is likely 100's of Ohms, the attenuation is negligable - after all the input impedance of the next stage may well be comparable to or less than the pot's resistance.

Of course there is always some parasitic capacitance added by the pot, but this is not something I'd worry about.

Cheers,

Ed
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2009, 02:16 PM   #3
Xoc1 is offline Xoc1  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Xoc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Devon UK
If you can bipass the volume control you should.
The wiring which typically snakes around the amp introduces a certain amount of hum and noise.
The Pot becomes a pull down resistor. Typically this has a very poor temperature coefficient. 500ppm is not unusual for some carbon types!
This is exactly what you are trying to avoid by using a stepped attenuator.
Also some pots are very microphonic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2009, 07:57 PM   #4
boidos is offline boidos  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Send a message via MSN to boidos
Default Removing the volume pot

Hi, thanks for the reply. Any tips on the easiest way to remove the volume pot.?
Cheers
Boyd
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bypassing a volume pot whitelabrat Tubes / Valves 6 29th July 2008 08:46 PM
Pot meter for volume setting Hyldal Solid State 3 17th January 2008 06:59 PM
How do you position your full range speakers? wixy Full Range 2 16th December 2007 10:58 AM
ALPS RK50 - Is this the best volume pot in the world? Sigurd Ruschkow Parts 29 18th November 2004 03:03 AM
Buzzing changes with volume pot position... JoeBob Parts 6 10th August 2004 07:20 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2