|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Hi all,
having a tube preamp with an output impedance of 5k or so, I just wanted to ask what do you think about increasing the P3A input impedance (~24K) to ~49K by increasing R2 to 47K. Obviously R5 would become 47K too, and R4 would be raised to 2k2 to mantain the same gain. C2 would be changed accordingly. Would this be too detrimental for the amp's noise perfomance? Thank you all, Christian |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Christian,
Might make 0.5dB difference. All my AKSAs, Lifeforce and Soraya power amps have 47K nominal impedance. Insignificant in the scheme of things. Try it. Hugh |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Quote:
I would like to do same thing on my P3A, but something isn't clear to me... To achieve an input impedance of ~49k I would have to: - increase R2 to 47k - increase R5 to 47k - increase R4 to 2,2k Nothing more than that? What does "C2 would be changed accordingly" mean? What is the general disadvantage of a higher input impedance, e.g. why is the input impedance of most power amps around 20k and not around 50k, which would obviously be much better suited for source equipment with BOTH low and high output impedances, and of course it would make the use of passive pre's much easier. Thanks a lot!! Martin |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Not sure what C2 is; if it's the input cap, you can halve it; if it's the feedback shunt cap, same again......
Hope this helps, Hugh |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Hello Hugh,
thanks for your reply! C2 is a small ceramic from input to ground (parallel to R2) and it's 100pF in the original schematic. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
C2 should remain untouched, it is C1 and C3 which need attention. However, you may find leaving them untouched is fine as it will just result in lower cut-off.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
Personally, i think with it's CFP output, making any change is asking for trouble
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Changes on the fb and input side should not affect the CFP output stage operation at all.
Hugh |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Increasing input Z on Leach amp | WithTarragon | Solid State | 5 | 19th October 2008 04:01 PM |
| DI guitar direct input box - increasing gain? | bubbamc119 | Instruments and Amps | 10 | 30th June 2005 01:22 AM |
| Increasing inductor impedance. | Tor M | Multi-Way | 2 | 2nd April 2005 07:54 PM |
| increasing o/p impedance to match IT?? | AudioGeek | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 10th July 2004 07:15 PM |
| Increasing Aleph 3 input impedance | Freddie | Pass Labs | 5 | 29th August 2001 10:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09471 seconds (78.56% PHP - 21.44% MySQL) with 10 queries |