Lumba Ogir said:Rüdiger,
anything is subject to discussion in this thread. What about this one?
Well, a FET cascode. What is you point?
Rüdiger
Most of the time I burn the midnight oil so I can catch up with Oz and say..G'day mate!
One of Australia's best bands ever, they had some insomnia to recommend too, although for serious reasons.
One of Australia's best bands ever, they had some insomnia to recommend too, although for serious reasons.
PMA,
of course, through the power supply capacitor, it can`t be any other way, can it? It`s never too late to reassess your stance and henceforth, without oversimplifying like amateurs, take it for what it is, a coupling capacitor, (directly) in series with the load.
In your software the grounds are ideal, the most vital parameters are constants, you get excellent results whatever you do. It`s worthless.
I`m sure AndrewT, syn08, salas and Jan fully agree.
of course, through the power supply capacitor, it can`t be any other way, can it? It`s never too late to reassess your stance and henceforth, without oversimplifying like amateurs, take it for what it is, a coupling capacitor, (directly) in series with the load.
In your software the grounds are ideal, the most vital parameters are constants, you get excellent results whatever you do. It`s worthless.
I`m sure AndrewT, syn08, salas and Jan fully agree.
Lumba Ogir said:PMA,
of course, through the power supply capacitor, it can`t be any other way, can it? It`s never too late to reassess your stance and henceforth, without oversimplifying like amateurs, take it for what it is, a coupling capacitor, (directly) in series with the load.
In your software the grounds are ideal, the most vital parameters are constants, you get excellent results whatever you do. It`s worthless.
I`m sure AndrewT, syn08, salas and Jan fully agree.
Another thing you are sure of, but is wrong.
Jan Didden
Jan,
I regret this divergence of opinion.
Despite the above objection, maybe we could dare to establish that there`s no way to bypass the signal path. Think twice before adding stuff like IC regulators, diodes, ceramic and tantalum capacitors, also there`s no way to camouflage any servos, turbos, relays, indicators, correction circuits. All these will leave a trail of dirty footprint.
I regret this divergence of opinion.
Despite the above objection, maybe we could dare to establish that there`s no way to bypass the signal path. Think twice before adding stuff like IC regulators, diodes, ceramic and tantalum capacitors, also there`s no way to camouflage any servos, turbos, relays, indicators, correction circuits. All these will leave a trail of dirty footprint.
Lumba Ogir said:Jan,
I regret this divergence of opinion.
Despite the above objection, maybe we could dare to establish that there`s no way to bypass the signal path. Think twice before adding stuff like IC regulators, diodes, ceramic and tantalum capacitors, also there`s no way to camouflage any servos, turbos, relays, indicators, correction circuits. All these will leave a trail of dirty footprint.
Don't change the subject. You said you were sure I'd agree. I don't. So you were wrong.
Jan Didden
The differential amplifier improves operation and ripple rejection considerably, compromising on that would be expressively unwise. Adding an array of mythical fairy lights instead, of course, would not help at all.
Despite measures taken, the moderately clean voltage (in this context) at the base of T9 is obviously a weak point.
Despite measures taken, the moderately clean voltage (in this context) at the base of T9 is obviously a weak point.
Sorry anyone,
I have a question of NAP-250 power supply.
Attached is schematic. Are they a shunt regulator?!?
No, this is a series regulator.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- General purpose shunt regulator