|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Hey,
I'm looking to upgrade my Marshall VS-265R guitar amp, the schematics are here: hxxp://www.drtube.com/marshall.htm#VS2 Here's a rundown of the chips, just wondering recommendations for replacements or if what's there are good... Amount Brand Model 3 JRC NJM072BD (TL072) 6 Mitsubishi?? 5201A 1 Panasonic?? MN3007 1 Panasonic?? MN3101 2 SGS Thompson LM348N 1 Motorola MC74HC4316N 1 Motorola TL071CP 3 TI RC4558P I think the JRC's are the main ones to replace. Also I think the MN3007 is for reverb, and the MN3101 is the clock for it, so I'm not worried too much about either of them. What's the opinion on JRC Op-Amps, I've read that they aren't the best, maybe go with TI (Burr Brown)? I'm not a total electronics newb, I worked in an electronics service dept for a few years, but as a computer tech.. So any advice is appreciated. Thanks! Joel |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
JRC Opamps can be good.
In order to do a good replacement, we need to know what type the old opamps are. These are all opamps, IC-s I can have seen before: TL072, RC4558, LM348, TL071 These I do not know about: 6 Mitsubishi?? 5201A 1 Panasonic?? MN3007 1 Panasonic?? MN3101 MC74HC4316N, is a digital logic IC and not to be replaced. Marshall The Valvestates Mk2, VS265R, 2x65W 2x12" combo with stereo chorus & reverb http://www.drtube.com/marshall.htm#VS2 The 2 PDF schematics with those opamps are: Chorus, Reverb: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/mar...v265-61-02.pdf Preamplifier: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/mar...v265-62-02.pdf Maybe some other members has some good advice.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southampton
|
Hi there,
I own a VS265 although it hasn't seen much use recently. Many years ago I had a play at improving it. I didn't try changing op-amps because in a guitar amp, as long as they're reasonable I don't think it's worth the effort. One thing that was very worthwhile was to fit some much larger power supply smoothing caps. The clean sound in particular improved significantly and became much more dynamic and responsive to transients. If you are looking for upgrades then I suggest looking mainly at the overall build of the amp, interconnections etc to reduce noise rather than the small signal circuitry itself. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
Wassamatter? You don't trust Marshall?
Changing these opamps will make 6ugger-all difference. As regards changing the amplifier sound, I thought the whole point of a Marshall amplifier is that you get that 'Marshall Sound'. If you feel an overpowering urge to play with components, why not build a second amplifier of some description rather than interfering with the one you've got. If you break it, then watcha gonna play? Every minute you spend messing with amplifiers is a minute you don't spend practising. Gearhead or guitarist? I guess we're all a bit of both. Those of us who play guitars and come on here that is... w |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Thanks for taking the time...
I'm not really looking to "change" the sound too much, just was curious if I could "improve" it a bit.. Lineup, do you have any recommendations for replacements to the TL072, RC4558, LM348, TL071?? The original brands and models are in the original post.. ceharden, so do you just mean increase the capacitance of the caps in the power supply? Is there a limit on how much I should? As I understand it, I should keep the voltage the same, but the capacitance can go higher right? wakibaki, I of course have faith in Marshall, but I know that they are trying to make as much money possible while producing a decent product, so they might cut some corners on some parts.. Now, I don't really want to change the sound, MUCH, but I don't mind if its a bit unique.. That's why I replaced the pickups in my Les Paul (granted the P-90's were fairly unique, but noisy). It is a bit of a curse, I was always the kid that took the toy apart at Christmas BEFORE playing with it.. Just always want to know what makes stuff tick, and now for the cost of op-amps, thought it might be a fun, cheap upgrade.. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southampton
|
Regarding the PSU caps, the originals are 2200uF PCB mounted. I think I added somewhere around 4700uF or 6800uF caps in parallel but just mounted them in free space in the case. The voltage rating needs to be the same or higher than the ones fitted (50V I think) but otherwise not critical.
I really think you don't need to worry about changing op-amps. The difference in that amp won't be worth the effort if it's even noticable. It's a guitar amp so it has distortion anyway and there is far more noise introduced elsewhere. Also consider improving the smoothing of the HT supply for the valve or trying different valves? I think you need to decide what you want to change about the sound before diving in! Just wanting it 'better' isn't a good place to start! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
|
I think that if there was a cheap, straightforward way of 'improving' the sound, Marshall would be the first to adopt it.
After all, what is more important than the sound when you take money out of the equation? They will have refined the amplifier to the point of diminishing returns. By this I mean that they don't think the tiny 'improvements' possible are worth the huge increase in expense. If you want a bit of fun, try building a practice amp (combo) from components or scrap. You need a power amplifier, a tone stack (optional), a PSU (can be batteries) a speaker and a box. There are loads of chip amps from the LM380 @ 2.5 watts on up. You can figure out most everything by reading the datasheets. I always get a kick out of mine beacuse it's quite useable and nearly everything in it was junk. w |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Alright, I think you've talked me out of it..
Thanks to all for taking the time. Joel |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
I've built an el84/ecc83 (12ax7) single ended tube amp.
Basically it's a Fender Champ http://www.schematicheaven.com/fende..._5e1_schem.pdf ..with an EL84 instead of the 6V6 and a solid-state rectifier. I even bought a vintage-style Jensen P10R to go with it. In fact, looking at ax84.com it's virtually identical to their AX84 P1 but for a few details. Go for it. Only thing, in the end it cost me more than a new Fender 6V6 amp with SS front end... A valve amp is a lot of work in the chassis and sourcing the components. If you can get a kit or part kit, so much the better. A quick google 'guitar amplifier kit' got me a few, worldwide shipping. With SS you can just hang components or even a PCB off the back of the tone controls, you can get the components anywhere and if you run from batteries it's never gonna kill ya. w |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Guitar amp problem (marshall 8080 valvestate) | Palmu85 | Instruments and Amps | 3 | 26th September 2011 09:33 PM |
| Muse Model 2 DAC upgrade with Guido Tent DAC upgrade? | jpchleapas | Digital Source | 1 | 31st January 2008 07:18 PM |
| Marshall 100v 8100U Guitar Amp Hums | DreadPirate | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 29th January 2007 02:20 PM |
| Classical guitar string and capo recommendations | fmeynert | Instruments and Amps | 7 | 1st July 2005 07:55 PM |
| turning an ibanez guitar amp to a marshall | electro samurai | Instruments and Amps | 0 | 5th June 2004 08:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16952 seconds (61.56% PHP - 38.44% MySQL) with 10 queries |