|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Hey, im making a stereo Linkwitz-Riley crossover with one output being connected a sub with its own amp, and the other to a pair of midrange speakers with their own amps, and i have a few things im unsure about...
1. Volume control - am i right in thinking the volume control, the standard dual log 10K pot, should be connected before the crossover? The only potential issue i have its that if the input signal is reduced before the opamps, the opamp noise will be a higher percentage of the output signal than if the pot was after the crossover, although this would mean a four pole pot, and the resistance from all the pots will not be the same. 2. Audio opamps - i know what the usual opamps used for audio are, but is using the MAX494 a good idea, it has low noise, is rail-to-rail (although this isnt important), low power, "precision" quad opamp? 3. I intend to create the negative supply with a charge pump IC, however, will the ripple from the output effect operation, or is it best to put the output from the charge pump through a linear regulator first? Thanks, Matt |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The one and only
|
1) The source impedance of the pot might affect the filter response,
so you need to consider that. Is this the main volume control, or the level controls used to determine the relative levels of low vs high? In either case you might need to buffer the output from the wiper. 2. This is probably not your best choice, partly due to the limited voltage swing of the device. Maybe some other quad and higher supply voltages. 3. You can always RC filter the negative supply ripple if you need to. I suggest putting a little distance between the charge pump and the analog circuits. Will it be able to deliver some real voltage, like 10-15 volts?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
1) The crossover is driven directly by an opamp with a gain of 1, with the volume control, which is the main volume control just before that, so the driven impendance shouldnt be a problem
2) After another look, i found the max414 which has lower noise and can operate with a larger voltage range, although it has higher operating current then the max494. Also, the limited operating voltage of the max494 shoudnt be a problem if its only dealing with line level voltages? 3) Well the input to the charge pump will be about 12-15V, with an output of 10-11V maybe, but looking again at the max voltages for the opamps, if i chose a max494 or 414 i will have to use a linear regulator to keep the supply voltage within the excepted range, which is 10.5V for the 414, but at least 20V comes from the charge pump and power supply. Thanks, Matt |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 LM3876 plus 1 LM3886 using Linkwitz-Riley crossover | baboon81 | Chip Amps | 2 | 4th March 2007 01:47 AM |
| A Challenge to Linkwitz-Riley ? | jackinnj | Multi-Way | 17 | 14th March 2006 11:50 PM |
| Linkwitz Riley Filter Implementation | Roysyboy | Subwoofers | 1 | 19th September 2005 03:40 AM |
| linkwitz-riley crossover | arthur | Solid State | 0 | 28th April 2003 10:26 AM |
| Linkwitz-Riley 24dB/octave Phase Coherent Crossover | djdan | Solid State | 30 | 25th September 2002 10:32 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |