For jcarr: PSRR of AD797 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th April 2003, 09:34 PM   #1
SY is offline SY  United States
On Hiatus
SY's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 2
Default For jcarr: PSRR of AD797

The question came up about what made the 797's PSRR so good- compared to most other IC opamps, the PSRR at high frequencies is as much as two orders of magnitude better.

I inquired to a friend of mine who was responsible for the design of that chip. His response boiled down to:

1. Tight matching of all the transistors on the chip. Everything balances much more closely than the norm.

2. Very stiff bias rails.

3. Cascoding of every stage.

The trade-offs are the inability to swing very close to the rails and the inability to accept common-mode signals that swing close to the rails. The bootstrap back to the current mirror you asked about is actually a way to drop output stage distortion. It's outlined in one of AD's patents, US5166637.

As a side note, I've used this chip in a phono amp and it worked spectacularly well.
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is."
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th April 2003, 02:44 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
jackinnj's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Default you remind me of how I wept

when I crushed one of these babies (AD797) the surface mount version, on my lab floor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th April 2003, 03:01 AM   #3
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Thank you very much, Sy:

>Tight matching of all the transistors on the chip.<

Always a good idea, but much more suited for monolithic construction than discrete.

>Very stiff bias rails.<

This is an interesting point that normally doesn't get much attention. But based on my own findings, I can concur. In fact, my Connoisseur 4.0 amplifier uses a folded-cascode topology with each and every bias point generated by a voltage regulator rather than a diode arrangement.

BTW, I have been experimenting with using bootstrapping to generate the biasing for the folded-cascode devices (within the context of a complementary topology), and the initial results are that this does consistently yield a measurable reduction in distortion. OTOH, I haven't gotten around to studying the PSRR areas yet.

>Cascoding of every stage.<

Ah. I had been wondering whether the summing current mirror was really a Widlar or not (per the simplified schematic provided in the datasheet). It sounds like it probably isn't.

>The trade-offs are the inability to swing very close to the rails<

But is this anything unique to the 797? Folded cascode topologies have this problem (if you can call it that) in general, because whatever voltage is used to bias the folded-cascode devices needs to be subtracted from the voltage rails, and the voltage dropped across the current sources does not contribute to output swing. The limiting voltage regarding the output swing is the biasing of the folded cascode devices, and since these must be clearly less than the supply voltages, the net effect is similar to a reduction in the supply rail voltages to the voltage gain stage.

>The bootstrap back to the current mirror you asked about is actually a way to drop output stage distortion.<

When I tried this some time ago, it appeared to me that what was happening was that the open-loop gain increased substantially, and this resulted in greater global NFB and was the primary mechanism in reducing distortion. But perhaps there is more happening than what my original observations suggested.

>It's outlined in one of AD's patents, US5166637.<

I will look this up.

>I've used this chip in a phono amp and it worked spectacularly well.<

So have I, and likewise, I thought that the results were promising.

Thanks again, Sy, and my compliments to your friend on a great design!

regards, jonathan carr
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The greatist - AD745 psrr Versus AD797 Fanuc Solid State 2 30th May 2009 11:12 PM
PSRR of CF w/ CCS Sink regal Tubes / Valves 7 30th June 2008 03:13 PM
Opamp PSRR lumanauw Solid State 10 12th March 2007 12:42 PM
Class D amp and the PSRR rtarbell Class D 14 12th January 2006 08:45 AM
PSRR and Crosstalk dgardner Solid State 4 20th June 2005 01:09 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2