|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
According to H&H, the base-emitter resistor that's sometimes used in Darlington pairs is intended to address two issues. One, to allow the driving device to turn off the output device much more quickly, and two, to prevent the driving device's leakage current from biasing the output device on.
That being the case, if the pair is going to be used class A and would never be turned off during normal operation, is there any particular need for the resistor? In other words, is there anything more to the resistor than the two issues outlined by H&H? se |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: staffordshire
|
Yes It will also speed up the output transistor and also improve the vceo rating if you look up tables on power transister you will find the vceo rating increases when a low value resistor is placed between base and collector
regards Trev |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
you could add that the R establishes a fairly constant current bias for the driver Q which seems to be a good idea for better driver operation even with Class A output bias
without the R the bias for the driver is the base current of the output Q with all of the output Q Hfe sensitivities multiplying the output Q current modulation with complementary EF "Darlington" output discrete stages a single driver bias R is often connected directly between driver emitters to provide them with a nearly constant current bias |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: upper austria/near linz
|
hello.
perhaps for the reason of more thermally stability.......... greetings..... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Darlington Bipolars as switches | rtarbell | Parts | 3 | 5th February 2006 06:47 PM |
| Darlington pair | Tualek53 | Parts | 9 | 16th August 2005 07:54 AM |
| Darlington and Triple darlington | lumanauw | Solid State | 78 | 1st December 2004 12:57 AM |
| What is a darlington output exactly? | mjarve | Solid State | 4 | 18th July 2004 01:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07888 seconds (63.35% PHP - 36.65% MySQL) with 10 queries |