Spice models for SK246/SJ103 anyone?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Disabled Account
Joined 2006
Here you go :

.model J2sj103 PJF(Beta=2.197m Rs=76.76 Rd=76.76 Betatce=-.5 Lambda=735.3u
+ Vto=-2.037 Vtotc=-2.5m Cgd=18.95p M=.5045 Pb=.3905 Fc=.5
+ Cgs=17.02p Isr=38.48f Nr=2 Is=3.848f N=1 Xti=3 Alpha=10u Vk=100
+ Kf=1E-18 Af=1)


.model J2sk246 NJF(Beta=1.07m Rs=56.76 Rd=56.76 Betatce=-.5 Lambda=2.8m
+ Vto=-2.638 Vtotc=-2.5m Cgd=10.38p M=.4373 Pb=.3905 Fc=.5
+ Cgs=6.043p Isr=112.8p Nr=2 Is=11.28p N=1 Xti=3 Alpha=10u Vk=100
+ Kf=1E-18 Af=1)


Cant guarantee accuracy though, they were from a japanese audio site.
 
Lumba Ogir said:
Nelson,
Why do you need them? You are the right man to empirically determine the biasing points, which has not yet been done reliably.
Before I learnt LTSpice I worked by trial and error. It's the sound that matters, not figures, so I guess you're right in a way. Some changes can be heard but not seen in simulation, eg transistors sound different from each other yet simulate exactly the same, current mirrors degrade the sound yet gives a perfect simulation, CFP input sounds very good but doesn't simulate any better etc. A lot of changes can be seen in LTSpice but not be heard.

From a DC perspective LTSpice has been very precise, and a circuit that's unstable in a simulator will most definately be unstable IRL. So simulating is quite helpful.

Pencil and paper is absolutely useless to me, since I can't calculate anything except the basics. I was about to learn electronics the proper way, but now that I've found LTSpice I'm far to lazy to do that.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.