|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#131 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Hi Jack,
Remember that the LME49810 is a totally different animal than the LME49811 and LM4702. The 810 must have a heatsink to run at the higher currents (up to 50ma) the 811 and 4702 can only do 5ma or so and I run mine without heatsinks when running +/-50VDC rails. For 75VDC rails then I have to use heatsinks on those two parts. I found they sounded better in the 50 VDC units without heatsinks but in the 75VDC rail units they are required (anything above +/-50VDC use the heatsinks). Ken, I did my attenuation in the D/A preamp I designed so I did not worry about an attenuation pot in the power amp. Also we reduced the input gain resistor not because of bandwidth but because of resistor noise. I used a 390 ohm input resistor with a 10K feedback resistor on my inverting LME49811 amplifier. Best Regards Everyone from a Still Out Of Work after 6 months (anyone have a job for me?) Audio Engineer, Mark / audioman54 |
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: illinois
|
mark:
hang in there; took me about 9 mos. best of luck and thanks for your contributions here, mlloyd1 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mark,
Thanks again for the help, I've made up the board, but got busy with other things, so I haven't stuffed the board yet. I'm looking forward to hearing the sound... Sorry you haven't had luck on the job market yet, you had mentioned a few interviews a month ago, and I was hoping you would be successful. Continued best wishes in your job hunt. Regards, Ken |
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Hi Ken,
Did you stick with the non-inverting configuration for the LME49713's? I am going to play with my new "AKM4399" demo board tomorrow. (I will just be using the digital front end.) I am told that with the 32-bit DAC the internal digital volume control is as good as a pot!? Need to test that out the next couple of weeks. Has anyone else done that already? Sure would make part of the analog design simpler...but then you need a micro to run the darn thing! AND it might not sound right at lower levels (less bits). "That Corp" actually flew me out to Boston and I had a 12-hour interview that I thought went great! Later in the week the owner of the company talked to the group that interviewed me over the phone on a conference call (he was at NAB). After that conference he called me to let me know they would not be making me an offer because the team "ALL" said I did not have enough "professional audio experience". Very, very disappointing for me. They appeared to me (during my 1 day visit) to be a great group of engineers. I would have really enjoyed working with them. Oh well, more free time to work on my new AKM4399 D/A board with my LME based power supplies. Hopefully I can get a job in the next 6 months so I don't loose my sound room, i.e. house! Best "High End Audio" Regards Everyone, Mark / audioman54 P.S. If have to leave the Bay Area where is the best "Audio" community to move to? |
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Youtube New Jersey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mark,
No, I inverted it. I don't have the schematic with me at work, but will post it in the next few days. I am using the 48600 for the power supply regulator, I built one and it seems to run great. I'm not very sophisticated with testing, but, the noise/ripple on my scope vs a 317 regulator was considerably less. Ken |
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
:)
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi jack, Thank you for your advice. I run the test again with a better heat sink (a small home-made was used). I can see the difference this time. The loaded THD performance is better than before. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| National Semi opamp seminar | pinkmouse | Solid State | 8 | 5th November 2007 11:59 AM |
| National TV | davidallancole | Solid State | 9 | 8th August 2006 12:25 AM |
| Single supply opamp - unequal rail voltage and opamp selection | Hans L | Parts | 8 | 19th February 2006 02:15 PM |
| New opamp from National | MRehorst | Parts | 15 | 21st February 2003 05:56 PM |
| stop that crazy animated gifs inflation ! | lohk | Everything Else | 30 | 29th September 2002 04:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11162 seconds (78.41% PHP - 21.59% MySQL) with 11 queries |