Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th May 2009, 03:48 PM   #131
diyAudio Member
 
audioman54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Hi Jack,

Remember that the LME49810 is a totally different animal than the LME49811 and LM4702. The 810 must have a heatsink to run at the higher currents (up to 50ma) the 811 and 4702 can only do 5ma or so and I run mine without heatsinks when running +/-50VDC rails. For 75VDC rails then I have to use heatsinks on those two parts. I found they sounded better in the 50 VDC units without heatsinks but in the 75VDC rail units they are required (anything above +/-50VDC use the heatsinks).

Ken,

I did my attenuation in the D/A preamp I designed so I did not worry about an attenuation pot in the power amp. Also we reduced the input gain resistor not because of bandwidth but because of resistor noise. I used a 390 ohm input resistor with a 10K feedback resistor on my inverting LME49811 amplifier.

Best Regards Everyone from a Still Out Of Work after 6 months (anyone have a job for me?) Audio Engineer,

Mark / audioman54
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2009, 04:02 PM   #132
mlloyd1 is offline mlloyd1  United States
diyAudio Member
 
mlloyd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: illinois
mark:
hang in there; took me about 9 mos.

best of luck and thanks for your contributions here,
mlloyd1

Quote:
Originally posted by audioman54
...
Best Regards Everyone from a Still Out Of Work after 6 months (anyone have a job for me?) Audio Engineer,

Mark / audioman54
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2009, 05:34 PM   #133
klewis is offline klewis  United States
diyAudio Member
 
klewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Blog Entries: 36
Mark,

Thanks again for the help, I've made up the board, but got busy with other things, so I haven't stuffed the board yet. I'm looking forward to hearing the sound...

Sorry you haven't had luck on the job market yet, you had mentioned a few interviews a month ago, and I was hoping you would be successful. Continued best wishes in your job hunt.

Regards,

Ken
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 12:56 AM   #134
:)
diyAudio Member
 
panson_hk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by jackinnj
Do you have a heat-sink on the LME device ? Heat degrades their performance.
I did not see any difference for using or not using heat sink during tests.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 06:09 AM   #135
diyAudio Member
 
audioman54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Hi Ken,

Did you stick with the non-inverting configuration for the LME49713's?

I am going to play with my new "AKM4399" demo board tomorrow. (I will just be using the digital front end.) I am told that with the 32-bit DAC the internal digital volume control is as good as a pot!? Need to test that out the next couple of weeks. Has anyone else done that already? Sure would make part of the analog design simpler...but then you need a micro to run the darn thing! AND it might not sound right at lower levels (less bits).

"That Corp" actually flew me out to Boston and I had a 12-hour interview that I thought went great! Later in the week the owner of the company talked to the group that interviewed me over the phone on a conference call (he was at NAB). After that conference he called me to let me know they would not be making me an offer because the team "ALL" said I did not have enough "professional audio experience". Very, very disappointing for me. They appeared to me (during my 1 day visit) to be a great group of engineers. I would have really enjoyed working with them.

Oh well, more free time to work on my new AKM4399 D/A board with my LME based power supplies. Hopefully I can get a job in the next 6 months so I don't loose my sound room, i.e. house!

Best "High End Audio" Regards Everyone,

Mark / audioman54

P.S. If have to leave the Bay Area where is the best "Audio" community to move to?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 12:20 PM   #136
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Quote:
Originally posted by panson_hk


I did not see any difference for using or not using heat sink during tests.
See Mark's comments above. We're using the same AP test equipment I would suspect.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 12:32 PM   #137
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Quote:
Originally posted by audioman54
P.S. If have to leave the Bay Area where is the best "Audio" community to move to?
I would not recommend New Jersey. The State's budget is off by another $1.2bn and the drivers have seized the laurel wreath from Massachusetts for their bad behavior.

Youtube New Jersey.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 02:46 PM   #138
klewis is offline klewis  United States
diyAudio Member
 
klewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Blog Entries: 36
Mark,

No, I inverted it. I don't have the schematic with me at work, but will post it in the next few days.

I am using the 48600 for the power supply regulator, I built one and it seems to run great. I'm not very sophisticated with testing, but, the noise/ripple on my scope vs a 317 regulator was considerably less.

Ken
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 02:56 PM   #139
diyAudio Member
 
scott wurcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cambridge ma
Quote:
Originally posted by jackinnj


and the drivers have seized the laurel wreath from Massachusetts for their bad behavior.

Youtube New Jersey.



__________________
2012, our time is running out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2009, 12:58 AM   #140
:)
diyAudio Member
 
panson_hk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Blog Entries: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by jackinnj


See Mark's comments above. We're using the same AP test equipment I would suspect.

Hi jack,

Thank you for your advice. I run the test again with a better heat sink (a small home-made was used). I can see the difference this time. The loaded THD performance is better than before.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lme49810.jpg (72.0 KB, 1042 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Semi opamp seminar pinkmouse Solid State 8 5th November 2007 11:59 AM
National TV davidallancole Solid State 9 8th August 2006 12:25 AM
Single supply opamp - unequal rail voltage and opamp selection Hans L Parts 8 19th February 2006 02:15 PM
New opamp from National MRehorst Parts 15 21st February 2003 05:56 PM
stop that crazy animated gifs inflation ! lohk Everything Else 30 29th September 2002 04:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Page generated in 0.11162 seconds (78.41% PHP - 21.59% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio