Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th September 2008, 10:09 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Default Single stage (sort of...) McPhono amp

Hi,
I never captured a certain flag in the endless struggle: discrete solid state, opamp, tubes... when it comes to phono amps.

While I like the cleanliness and dry but powerful bass response of opamps circuits, I also want colourful mids and 'right' trebles I often get with discrete circuits.

So I thought of an hybrid. It turned out to work as intended: kickin' bass and swingy cymbals.

I wasn't able to hear problems due to the single gain stage topology, noise is very low as well.

I like the split riaa technically (some fine adjustments still on the todo-list), and maybe it plays its part in the received sonics.

The range of usable opamps is limited due to the huge gain it has to deliver. So far, I have only tried OP27, OPA637 and AD797, the latter being the taste winner for me, OPA637 is nice as well, but softer and less pronounced in the bass, OP27 tends to be squeeky.

So far, I don't use coupling caps or servos, I made R6 partly adjustable, and the remaining DC (a dozen of mV) is snipped of by the poweramp's input cap.

It lacks the negative aspects some people feel opamp-circuits have sonically. I like to hear your comments on possible design flaws it certainly has, but with a smile, due to the fantastic sound

Have fun,
Rüdiger
Attached Images
File Type: gif unity.gif (26.0 KB, 688 views)
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 10:23 AM   #2
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
what about moving R13 & C2 to after the FET follower? Would it perform as well?
maybe change to 160r and 470nF.

How well matched to the two quad FETs need to be?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 10:29 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi Andrew,
one thing to try would be to add another follower in front of R13/C2. What would you think is the advantage of 160/470n for R13/C2?

For J1-J4 I use 2SK389/2SK109. Even with these, the offset has to be trimmed out. It's one of the penalties with this insane amount of gain.
They are biased at 6.9mA.

(the rest of the setup is AT33PTG cart, SAEC 407/23 tonearm and Sony TTS-4000 player)

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 10:33 AM   #4
AndrewT is online now AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Quote:
Originally posted by Onvinyl
What would you think is the advantage of 160r/470n for R13/C2?
lower output impedance to better drive the cables and next stage. But, will it sound as good?

What if the follower/buffer is simply moved inside the feedback loop?
Do you need to implement W.Jung's composite (opamp) feedback to get this to work?

Have you got an OPA228 to try? Some like them and others don't.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 10:44 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
OK, I see. No, I don't I want such an high output impedance.

I have no OPA228. I will try a LT1028 I have in my parts box.

It might indeed be interesting place an additional follower before R13/C2 and include it in the loop. On the other hand, it needed some trying to place the caps of C1 in a way the opamp could still control the feedback loop well, so might introduce trouble. A discrete diamond buffer would be nice as well, but is even more complex.

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 12:45 PM   #6
lineup is offline lineup  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
lineup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
Nice amplifier, Rüdiger

I wouldnt change much.
I have used similar design for x100 gain microphone amplifier (9 VDC battery supply).

I would maybe only replace those two 2SJ74 in input stage,
with two (2) 2SK170 used as jfet-CCS constant current source
for the LTP input pair.

Great circuit.
And good FET performance/ FET sound, I imagine
__________________
lineup
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2008, 12:34 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi,
I added a servo. Works very good. I have to figure out the maximum working value for R16, since it's crucial for proper performance (too high = DC might not be nulled, too small=noise and THD would rise)

An issue is the fact, that I wasn’t able to implement the distortion cancellation caps according to the AD797’s datasheet without getting huge overshoot in the output waveforms. Any clues what might cause this?

Lineup, what would you think is the benefit of replacing the 2SJ74 (2SJ109 in reality)?

Rüdiger
Attached Images
File Type: gif unityservo.gif (30.0 KB, 465 views)
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2008, 12:59 PM   #8
lineup is offline lineup  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
lineup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
Really is not sure what benefit.
But my intuition tells me to do this.
One thing is of course that 2SJ109 is NOT one P-Channel version of 2SK389.
If anyone ever did imagine this ....

Is also in my KISS philosophy. (Keep It Simple)
Why add 2 active transistors, when I can make it work as well without them.
Okay, they do some job.
But one commonly used current source would be my choice,
and was my choice for my microphone amplifier,
... if not using some Pure Resistor Biasing!!

Regards
Lineup
__________________
lineup
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2008, 01:02 PM   #9
mlloyd1 is offline mlloyd1  United States
diyAudio Member
 
mlloyd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: illinois
onvinyl:

that's pretty clever. where have i seen that input stage before?

i can't help feeling like something is being wasted by not somehow using signals out of the drains of the 2sj74, but i don't know how to address that feeling ...

have you compared different input stage topologies? for example, using a conventional, resistor biased differential stage of single polarity njfets (either 2sk369 or the precious 2sk146 comes to mind)? this was done a lot in the 80's to varying degrees of success, but there were no op amps around like the AD797 or OPA637 to follow it up.

mlloyd1
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2008, 01:52 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Hi mlloyd,

similar topo's are sometimes used for mic amps. Bernhard Vogel discussed something like that (but with bjt's) in his 'noise-bible'

There would be a whole world of different input stages possible, but this one did sim extremly well.
I have a bunch of relativly beefy 2SK369's I might try someday.

lineup, 2 pfet's are not more than 2 nfet's for a current source...
Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Single Stage Inverting or no? azira Tubes / Valves 7 14th December 2004 03:56 PM
Single FET line stage wleediy Solid State 12 6th July 2004 06:18 AM
Single Stage power amp. lumanauw Solid State 10 2nd April 2004 09:03 AM
Anyone play with the Zen Single-Stage Single-Ended Class A? Rino odorico Pass Labs 13 29th August 2002 09:01 AM
Single stage PWM amplifiers. Rhesus Solid State 3 14th February 2002 03:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Page generated in 0.13905 seconds (71.96% PHP - 28.04% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio