|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
I don't really know in what forum to ask...
Can I put a simple shunt volume control in front of differential line receiver ? Just as attached, but without the two opamps buffering the inputs of the receiver. Any problems I might run into ? It's to sum the outputs of a pcm1794 (after I/V conversion).
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
You would have to use low value resistors and a pot infront of the existing diff stage (inc resistors). This may mean that when the volume is attenuated a lot you place too much load on the driving stage.
Think of it as the same impednace problem with any passive pre-amp.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
|
What I had in mind:
4.7K resistors for the fixed resistors of the shunt and also 4.7K for the input resistor of the receiver. 22k resistors for the feedback around the opamp. A 10k stepped attenuator as shunt. I can tailor the values of the attenuator to get true logarithmic attenuation. I'm not overly concerned by the current drawn by the shunt as the I/V stage is buffered by class A buffers iddling at 20ma. The whole thing is of course in the same box, no cables involved here.
__________________
Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Doesn't sound too bad. There may be some funny curve characteristic due to interaction between the shunt and input resistors, but other than that OK I think.
Is there a reason you can't just use one side of the converter with a conventional unbalanced level control? As you seem to be ending up with an unbalanced output anyway.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balanced Driver / Receiver | arigy | Solid State | 11 | 14th June 2010 09:26 AM |
| Marantz SR7200 receiver - problem with front 2 channels | willick | Solid State | 1 | 28th July 2008 03:20 AM |
| Balanced interconnect to differential amp - how would you do it? | zigzagflux | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 5th February 2008 02:36 AM |
| What front end for PP - triode, pentode, mu-stage or differential triodes? | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 29th May 2007 08:02 PM |
| Balanced / Differential Input Question | thylantyr | Solid State | 2 | 28th March 2003 09:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10514 seconds (55.50% PHP - 44.50% MySQL) with 11 queries |