|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I have a Yamaha C-85 that has regular as well as inverting preamplifier
outputs. It allows the bridging of two amplifiers or running two stereo amplifiers with one channel inverted; potentially while both channels go positive, each channel will use a different power supply rail. I have used the C-85 with two Yamaha M-45s in both configurations and it works well. So. . . A balanced output has an inverted and non-inverted signal. It seems that you should be able to use the balanced output as two unbalanced outputs--one regular and one inverted. It would be quite easy to wire up an XLR or TRS plug and split it out to two RCA connectors. There will be the usual impedance issues but the signals should work the same. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Picture Sample
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
impedance matching is FAR more important than output voltage.
Impedance is not the side issue you imply. The two outputs must exactly match impedance wise (and that includes capacitance) to better than 0.1%. If not then you are wasting your time. The corollary to this is that one signal could be absent and the balanced impedances would still allow good signal transfer to the balanced input with good common mode (noise+interference) rejection.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
You have to try it, because the result would depend on the senders and receivers topology. Chris, Do you mind clarifying your problem/question? Seems we understand it differently. @Andrew such a blanket requirement of yours is wrong. Source impedance matters with simple differential receivers more than with advanced inputs. Accidentally we don't know anything of the input circuits. And any common mode reduction is better than no one. ![]() regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Sorry, I've been busy with the grape harvest in Sonoma County.
I want to use the balanced output of my mixer in the same manner as I use my Yamaha C-85 preamplifier. There are four output jacks. Two for Left and Two for right, but each second pair is inverted. So it allows you to bridge an amplifier easily. The tip of regular output will be swing high while the tip of the inverted output will swing low(in ref to gnd). I guess I can just wire up the system and find out. I don't need balanced outputs for the short runs and the amplifiers have unbalanced inputs. . . |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sonic differences between inverting/non-inverting LM4780 VS both non-inverting LM4780 | jarthel | Chip Amps | 5 | 19th July 2007 01:37 PM |
| X2 Balanced Outputs Question | TwangBar | Pass Labs | 2 | 15th March 2007 04:21 AM |
| whats the difference between inverting and no inverting | mikee55 | Parts | 1 | 7th January 2007 11:36 PM |
| Aleph Phase Inverting / non inverting | macka | Pass Labs | 9 | 22nd February 2006 08:01 PM |
| Bridged/Stereo, w or w/o servo, inverting 3886, inverting buffer PCB | Alexander Rice | Chip Amps | 9 | 27th March 2004 07:53 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09717 seconds (72.89% PHP - 27.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |