|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Berlin, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
Excellent. Long time needed.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Amazing work and results. I hope the author will keep up with more opamps (there are quite some [worth evaluating] devices, in particular from AD and TI).
Nothing really surprising, only the LT1115/LT1128 are dissapointing and somehow conflict with my own measurements (but then I did not evaluate the common mode linearity and the input impedance linearity). I also hope the discrete opamp manufacturers will send samples for evaluation (to help answer the third question) but somehow I doubt they will... Anybody asking "but how does it sound?". |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
That is a great article. I think congratulations to Scott are in order.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Unfortunately Samuel did not measure couple of my favorite opamps, though I've asked him...
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
Great Paper with very interesting commentary.
Interesting how quickly things degrade once you start to drive heavy loads and/or high output levels on most of the devices.. I might be wrong, but it looks like the AD749 comes out tops overall and the LME4xxx from Natsemi a creditable 2nd place. The author also commented that extra care is needed on the AD device. I think th e NS device is a bit easier to use, so thats what its got in its favour. As mentioned alreadt, congratulations are in order to Scott Wurcer! |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
OPA211, THS4031, OPA827, OPA2822, OPA842 from TI ADA4899-1, AD823, AD8066, AD8610, AD8599 from Analog Devices EL2227 from Signetics/Elantec ...and probably more... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Excellent piece for reading - even for non IC-guys!
Have fun, Hannes
__________________
fresh matched IRFP240/IRFP9240 fets || AlephJ/JX-kitsF5 transistor kits || Burning Amp BA-1/2 transistor kits |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Why is it needed to use topology that give noise gain 60dB more than signal gain?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SWR t-shoot question | ReldvS | Solid State | 3 | 10th August 2009 11:01 PM |
| TB shoot out long | RAW | Multi-Way | 0 | 1st August 2003 07:18 PM |
| TB/MCM 8" shoot out | RAW | Multi-Way | 2 | 20th October 2002 02:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |