|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
(The thread name sounds like an old Kipling novel... HI hi...) Ok: I'm just learning how components works, yes I'm studying and I'm afraid that the 'diode moment' is arrived... Well, I understand what they are doing in the dark belly of my amp, but I would like to replace them with some better Schottky or something fast recovery or soft recovery or not recovery at all
These are the original parts: BAW62 IN60 IN4002. I bought some Schottky 11DQ10 to replace IN4002. Which I could choose to replace the other two? Thank you so much for your comprehension |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
What is the function of the diode(s) you want to replace. If they are used to bias the base of a transistor (~0.7V), then a Schottky won't work because the drop across the junction is different.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Soft recovery diodes are often used in switch mode PSU's that run at many KHz and also TV line output stages etc. An ordinary diode just can't turn on and off quickly enough here.
In a linear PSU (mains transformer 50/60 Hz) some swear by shottkys and soft recovery diodes, but you need to be careful. The BAW62 is I think only rated at half an amp or so max peak current, and this is a true high speed device. The IN4002 is a standard 1 amp rectifier as used in PSU's. Shottky devices are based on an entirely different principle of operation and have drawbacks. Then there are the "Glass passivated" types. A good mod is just to add 0.01 mfd caps directly across the 4 diodes in a bridge. If you swap diodes you need to consider the P.I.V. and both the max repetitive and non repetitive currents that the device will see. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Thank you for your explanation.
Now I've found this advice: "upgrade BAW62 (both preamp and poweramp) to fast diodes with slow recovery characteristic (Onsemi UG4D)". Could it works? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You mean soft recovery
You really need to know what the diodes in the amp do before you can think about replacing them and that really means studying the circuit. Not what you wanted to hear is it |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Ok. Thank you so much. I'll definitely do this way.
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gothenburg
|
Hi Mooly!
You seem to know a lot about rectifier diodes, I have been looking the most low noise diodes I can find, but I think that the parameters are contradicting, som say fast are good, but then there are some that say that to fast cause ringing. Can you recommend some good diodes for rectification? I need 1.2A @ 20V and 50mA @ 500V. I have looked into the SONIC range and they seem good, but a little to expensive, have you any experience whit these or other diodes designed for low EMI? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
Well, no easy answer in that many will disagree with what I say High speed, soft recovery diodes have a very specific use. If you want to rectify the AC from a mains transformer just think what that voltage looks like. It's a low frequency sine wave. A high speed diode is used for example to rectify the voltage from the winding on a switch mode PSU or a line output transformer. This may be anything from a squarewave ( with very fast rise/fall times ) to something little more than a short duration high voltage "pulse" at anything up to 100 khz or so. An ordinary diode would literally burn up as the switching losses would be so high. There are no such problems with a 50/60 sine wave. So on that point there is no advantage in using anything other than ordinary diodes. Now think of a half wave rectifier ( a bridge is just the same ) and a single smoothing cap. The cap is charged to the peak value of the incoming AC ( less diode drop ). Now put a load across the cap. The diode "tops up" the cap every half cycle, but it only comes into conduction when the rising part of the AC equals the DC voltage on the cap. At this point, some diodes can generate interference -- just for a few 10's of micro seconds -- a lot of which depends on the characteristics of the transformer, inductance of wiring etc. It's easy to avoid this completely, just add a 10 nf cap across each diode and possibly a snubber network over the secondaries. Would using high speed diodes be better ? On their own, maybe, but adding the caps just totally swamps the effect and in my opinion is the best option. So what to recommend. Nothing exotic for sure Just remember when it comes to PSU's layout and grounding are the most important factors. Edit, actually it's a pretty good all rounder http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data.../118792_DS.pdf |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bad Schottky?? | pjanda1 | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 27th January 2009 12:21 AM |
| what schottky have been used? | freakyone | Pass Labs | 35 | 27th June 2006 12:08 AM |
| connection of schottky | freakyone | Parts | 7 | 9th April 2006 01:25 AM |
| SiC Schottky rectifiers. | TugaTweaker | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 29th June 2005 07:57 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10896 seconds (71.37% PHP - 28.63% MySQL) with 10 queries |