Project 11.1 from Slone "High-Power Amplifier" Book - Page 5 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th July 2008, 11:08 PM   #41
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by The golden mean
David of Lede audio seems to be a nice man. FWW A quote from a mail from him when I asked about the Optimos or the Totem Pole as a sub-amp:

"The Totem Pole would be my best selection for the job and if you run it to it's full capacity I expect the police will be around for a few drinks."

Maybe David can supply you with the schematics?

http://www.ledeaudio.com/about_us.html
Well, I am not that anxious to see the schematic that I want to beg for it. But just a brief explanation of the major differences between the amps would be interesting. Probably Slone would answer that if mailing him, but I wouldn't want to bother him with it. Sooner or later we'll probably find out, one way or another.

I think the answer you got gives a hint that more power and ruggedness might actually be the main difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 02:59 AM   #42
Fanuc is offline Fanuc  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Anstruther, Fife
Quote:
Originally posted by megajocke
But that capacitance doesn't swing the whole output at +-50V as it's the gate-source capacitance. It will only swing +-10V - and that is if the amp is close to current limiting - effectively reducing gate source capacitance to 100pF as seen by the VAS. Gate-drain capacitance is only 8pF! Total capacitance of output stage as seen by VAS: ~300pF. 28mA into this -> 100V/uS. Bad devices will be worse of course OTOH gate voltage swing will be less than +-10V if driving an 8 ohm load
I am not sure the capacitance figures are right you mention. As this is load and frequency dependant irrespective of driver topology. Mosfet Zin and transconductance plus a capacitive load etc. I have never seen slew rates mentioned with non resistive loads etc. I think those slew rates for the output devices can only be acheived for the output stage by buffering with a follower ie. a much lower Zout follower upto HF than a VAS stage. Switch on and switch off capactance is likely to get worse at HF also.
imo. hope for the best but plan for the worst and buffer it!

Quote:
Originally posted by bear
oh, yeah... BJTs do many things very well.
The thing that I do not like about them is that they "hard" clip - which is audible, very audible. Mosfets for whatever reason seem to be a bit "softer" on the edges (of the clipped waveform) and do not sound the same (better to my ears) when clipped... try to build an amp that does not ever get driven into clipping, get back to me on that one...
Very good points there esp. with electrostats and ribbons. Had a amp with BJT outputs with stats and it was horrendous when clipping. It must be designed for the job period. Cheap amps with small current delivery won't do. Am sure BJT's could do a good job here but has to designed well. Regarding clipping one way is to use baker clamps and/or different rail voltages. If the output stage is run slightly higher (a few volts) than the input/driver stage this may work.

An interesting comparison would be to use a generic Lin type and different outputs and compare clipping sounds and different techniques to minimise it.

Regards

Kevin
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 03:34 AM   #43
djk is offline djk
diyAudio Member
 
djk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
BJTs drive E-stats just fine, if they're designed properly.

A Baker clamp will keep BJTs from going into common mode conduction when driving a capacitive load into clipping.

An APT Model One is a good example of and output and driver stage with such a clamp.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 10:19 PM   #44
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
Yes, please keep the "secrete" among just a few of us in the diyAudio forum.

My understanding is David from Ledeaudio got the rights from Mr. Randy Slone to sell the kits. This happened before the Canadian company bought some (possibly rather exclusive) rights from Mr. Slone.

So we are lucky that we can still get these wonderful designs in kits. Let us not to cause trouble for anyone.

I bought the Optimos kits from David 3 years ago. When the Totem-Pole was just released, I asked David if there would be any sonic difference. Daivd possibly had not built the Totem-Pole at the time but he told me it was designed for more power, more rugged for professional use but he suspected the Optimos would sound at least as good. I don't have more information than this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 10:22 PM   #45
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by HiFiNutNut

My understanding is David from Ledeaudio got the rights from Mr. Randy Slone to sell the kits. This happened before the Canadian company bought some (possibly rather exclusive) rights from Mr. Slone.

Very possible, but as I pointed out before, Zus is obviously involved in the kits too since their logo appears on the Totempole pcbs. Maybe Slone had already sold rights for the kits so his deal with Zus included Zus taking over the rights for the kits too?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 02:37 AM   #46
rckbrwn is offline rckbrwn  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Junction City, OR
Default New edition of Slones Amp book

Amazon is advertising the new edition of the High-Power Audio Amplifier Construction Manual, due out in Nov 2008. It has info on the totem pole and class g amps. $26.37.

Rick
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2008, 03:47 AM   #47
Karl71 is offline Karl71  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rick -

Thanks for the update.

Since I started the thread a few months ago, I have changed my speaker design goals and have returned to dynamic drivers.

I may pick the new edition up for Christmas.

Regards,

Karl
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Randy Slone's "Fig 11.4" (Self's "Blameless"?): PCB layout tcpip Solid State 128 23rd September 2013 04:45 PM
What makes an amplifier "bright", "warm", or "neutral"? JohnS Solid State 51 13th December 2009 06:42 PM
Book "Evolve Power Amplifiers" from Shinichi-Kamijo in English ? tiefbassuebertr Solid State 2 13th August 2009 04:22 AM
Randy Slone "Fig 11.6" amp, modded: will work? tcpip Solid State 85 29th May 2007 10:31 PM
"High" THD in Slone Figure 11.4 amp Thoru Solid State 30 13th March 2006 04:01 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2