|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: vancouver
|
Gents I have a older ('95) Arcam D290 Integrated Amp.
For the last few years I'v been running it with a Tube pre. Because It sounds MUCH better with it's Pre out of circuit. It's my understanding (?) that this Integrated (like most) is just a Sensitive Power Amp with a Tone control setup passing as the Pre section.. a view substantiated by the massive padding required to to get my outboard pre to work with it. Now I'm wondering that if I "upgrade' the NE 5534's and TL 107's in the Tone/pre section would I get significant improvements ? .. enough to allow enabling the 'pre' section ..unplugging my Tube pre and using the D290 as an intergrated again?? Yes this leads into which OpAmp is 'best' areas... But the Ne5534's Are almost a 2 decade old design. Help? opinions Happily recieved / considered |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06222 seconds (61.82% PHP - 38.18% MySQL) with 9 queries |