|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
I had this post in 'chipamps' but thought it might belong here.
I've been hot rodding an older Ashly active crossover, (new caps, opamp swap, etc.) and have been trying to track down some noise issues. Here is what I've done so far: I've have swapped out the opamps for LM4562s. The coupling caps (c20,40,45,50,73,76,77) have been replaced with higher values (220mf) I also had to change the voltage regulators to + 15v. Here are some initial observations: Things are much quieter than before, but I'm getting a bit of 'rocky-spity' noise. Someone is not happy. I've a little oscillation on the outputs way up high (30 Mhz area) but just above the noise floor. Also, the sound is a bit brittle. Any other suggestions would by greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bill (Schematic)
__________________
Wish I had 5.1 ears... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Copenhagen
|
The problem with swapping opamps, is that the original circuitry around is optimized for the original type.
You might wanne check the data sheet for your new opamps and the change C38, C39, C41, C44, C68, C69, C74 and C75 accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Thanks Nrik,
I had been looking at those caps as well, but I'm not sure which way to go. Bigger or smaller? Any idea what spec on the data sheet should I compare between original and replacement that will help determine the ballpark value? I had studied the 4562's data sheet carefully, but may have missed something important. =Bill
__________________
Wish I had 5.1 ears... |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
The 4562 is IMO a fantastic part, but it's fast. You have to be careful swapping it into circuits that were laid out for slower parts. Be sure to use small ceramic or film bypass caps right at the power leads of every op-amp. If any stage has large loops and isn't stable, install a local feedback cap in the small pF range, right at the leads. Obviously you need to check everything with a fast scope. There's a fair amount of "stuff" in that circuit, and the signal to noise ratio is set right up front in the diff amp with a gain of 1. You'll never do better than what happens in that first stage, so something to think about is gain redistribution. If you change the front end gain to 2X, and attenuate the last stage by the same amount, voila, instant 2X noise improvement. Of course you lose headroom, but how much do you really need?
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Great info Conrad, thanks!
__________________
Wish I had 5.1 ears... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive crossover into active crossover | hahfran | Multi-Way | 16 | 10th February 2008 06:16 PM |
| active crossover with UCD problem | ackcheng | Class D | 30 | 26th May 2007 01:43 AM |
| active crossover + noise | Calebay | Solid State | 5 | 20th April 2005 04:20 PM |
| Active Crossover Problem | Eargasm | Solid State | 11 | 27th March 2005 07:38 AM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.48706 seconds (12.27% PHP - 87.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |