Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd May 2008, 03:55 PM   #1
prorms is offline prorms  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Send a message via ICQ to prorms
Default is this true about capacitors????

is this true about capacitors????

Electolytic and tantalum capacitors have very poor audio characteristics and should not be used in the audio signal path


1 been the best for audio



1 polytetrafluorethylene (Teflon) capacitors
2 Polystyrene (styrene, styroflex, or styrol) capacitors
3 polycarbonate capacitors
4 polypropylene capacitors
5 Polyester (Mylar) capacitors
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 04:03 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
It depends on where and how they're used. There have been some VERY highly rated amps that have used electrolytics (usually aluminum, not tantalum) in the input and feedback paths. Since power supply caps are nearly universally electrolytic, the signal passes through them, too.

Tantalum caps are much more problematic- see, for example, John Curl's paper in Audio.

Some designers feel that an aluminum electrolytic ANYWHERE is anathema. Others don't. That's why the discussions get so heated.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 04:03 PM   #3
Nordic is offline Nordic  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Nordic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Sometimes electrolytics in signal path is not optional... Sound quality changes in my test were not realy price dependant...

Some of the negative aspects can be improved on by bypassing with a suitable film cap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 04:04 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Polycarbonates are good for sample-and-hold circuits, averaging (integrating) for RMS converters, oscillators, filters but they rank below polypropylene IMHO.

Styrenics are great for filter circuits, decoupling, etc. but are low in terms of popularity because they can't be "reflowed" unless you want a pile of goo on your PCB.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 04:05 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
gtforme00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Tantalum capacitors have measurably high distortion products in the audio range when used as coupling capacitors.

Click the image to open in full size.

Here is one source for this information, although they do not include the exotic types you listed.
http://www.electronicscomponentsworl...131512008.html

Regards,
David
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 04:37 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
There is nothing particularly wrong with BG N-type electrolytics in the signal path. Dirt cheap and better than most general purpose films. Of course only for lowish (<50v) voltages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 05:53 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: mendoza
Any body knows something about the new so called solid aluminum capacitors?

Gigabyte uses them in their new motherboards, and call them "Conductive Polymer Aluminum Solid Capacitor"
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 08:02 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
Polymer caps would be things like the Oscon caps. They have better HF performance and lower esr than regular electrolytics, but aren't available in high voltages that I've seen. They seem to have the same audio problems as other electrolytics, and I avoid either, except in places where large values can't be avoided. They do work very well as the energy storage caps on low voltage signal boards, though you still need small ceramics or films next to the active devices. I wouldn't be too paranoid. If a preamp needed a 2uF coupling cap, I'd absolutely go with polypropylene. OTOH, if you needed 20uF, an electrolytic would be in order.
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 08:17 PM   #9
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Default How about the test setup?

Quote:
Originally posted by gtforme00
Tantalum capacitors have measurably high distortion products in the audio range when used as coupling capacitors.

Click the image to open in full size.

Here is one source for this information, although they do not include the exotic types you listed.
http://www.electronicscomponentsworl...131512008.html

Regards,
David
Can anyone explain how the test setup really looked like? Just inserting a cap and get 1% distortion? I have read the pdf but somehow I have missed this information.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2008, 08:57 PM   #10
CBS240 is offline CBS240  United States
diyAudio Member
 
CBS240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
Hi

I just found this interesting paper. It's kind of technical, but so far, most of it makes sense to me, haven't finished it yet. This paper has better visual references and is easier to understand. Somewhere I saw a paper with DA values for different electrolyte materials but now I don't remember where. Maybe it was Mr. Curl's paper.
IMHO, polystyrene is the best but I haven't seen any in values above 10nf. Next on my list is polypropylene. I have a couple of 20uf polypropylene caps around here somewhere. They are axial at about 1"D X 3"L, and a cost of about $15 each. I use 1uf polypropylene for my input caps. Third on my list of options is Teflon. COG chip caps aren't too bad either but exist only in small values, pf's. I like these for compensation. I try not to even fool with the others for signal purposes.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
true VCE = 0V Tcheko Everything Else 10 9th June 2009 01:31 AM
what is the difference between silver mica capacitors and ceramic capacitors ?? prorms Solid State 1 6th May 2008 12:38 PM
True....true!!! mikeks Everything Else 4 18th June 2004 02:51 AM
capacitors: panasonic FC vs elna RJH vs rubycon ZA capacitors costiss Parts 11 30th January 2003 09:32 PM
differences between computer grade capacitors and small can capacitors LBHajdu Pass Labs 0 22nd February 2002 01:29 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Page generated in 0.10446 seconds (79.95% PHP - 20.05% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio