Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Class D,T or whatever (pwm amplifiers)
Class D,T or whatever (pwm amplifiers)
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th November 2001, 01:39 PM   #11
lohk is offline lohk  Europe
diyAudio Member
lohk's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere in Austria, near the Danube
Dear all,

thank you Geoff for your views about language. Many people in english speaking countries ofter seem to forget that it not spoken by everybody in the world (why do we not speak chinese ? ) and it is not always easy to express probably controversial meanings with the "appropriate" courtesy or sublety. English is the language of this forum, like of anything else in the WWW, but is not my mother tongue, I need far more time to read and write posts than others. Whilst some try to read a possible "subtext" others struggle to understand the basic meaning perhaps. So let us all be patient and tolerant. This also refers to humour and sarcasm for example, that can be "tricky" sometimes.
I often had the opinion to be misunderstood somehow by members of this forum, and I suspect it was just a subtle "mistake" or typo by myself.

You can also never know if there is a "professional spy" disguised as an amateur in the forum, but some members are declared professionals (Nelson Pass has shared with us so much of his knowledge, why not give something back if possible...).
But DIYers are in so many ways ahead of the audio industry, we can at least think in cost-no-object terms. And sound quality is a matter of taste and decision anyway ( ... thank you for offering your Krell, but keep it , I rather listen to my ZEN ... ).

I personally think that it should be allowed to discuss about "digital aplifiers", more because technology is constantly changing and audio is a subjective issue in general. There are new approaches by http://www.lcaudio.com and others. I listened to some digital pro amps in the last years (LABGruppen, Sony, etc.) and they are not that bad, specially driving subwoofers extremly good. There are interesting approaches to switched power supplies (CHORD, LINN) which can sound very good (look how many studios use Chord amps now, they deliver the stuff we listen to after all). So this subject is HIGHLY discutable, in my opinion. Although I still listen mainly to "classical" classA and AB amps, which is not outdated in any sense, but I began experiments with new technology (powerOPs). Remember when digital consumer audio came up in the early eighties, it was just a joke, a ridiculous caricature. But now we all (most of all) are listening to digital sources, the development was breathtaking.
The technological difficulties in designing a "very good" classD amp are probably much more demanding. But so what. We all are not shy about "difficult" solutions. Is it by the way not a nice idea to have a high quality amp in pocket size, at least for your studio or workshop, while the big cooking class A monobloc is sitting in your living/listening room ?

  Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2001, 01:39 AM   #12
GRollins is offline GRollins  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
I'm not sure that your point about CD technology is valid, as there's a world of difference in swinging 2V compared to, say, 30V with a great deal of current, and doing it cleanly. So far, commercial examples have been limited to low frequencies (e.g. subwoofer amplifiers), or pro sound applications, where the sound quality is of secondary importance at best.
Will the quality improve? I certainly hope so.
I don't see that my earlier comments qualify as prejudice against any technology, whether old or new. For what it's worth, I don't regard class D amplifiers as 'new.' The basic concept has been around for a while. If you're so quick to complain about the lack of 'new' technology, I suggest that you check the patent dates on some of Nelson Pass's work. Likewise Ralph Karsten (Atma-Sphere). I believe Krell has a patent (at least pending) on their CAST technology. Etc. etc. etc.
The tone of some of your posts leads me to believe that there is more than simple language difficulty at play, here. Just because no one picks up on your thread is no reason to complain, as you did in your second post above. If no one is interested at present--be patient. Someone may come along later and reply.
If someone is offering you a Krell and you don't want it, I'll take it. I can always use another channel or two of amplification...
On the subject of language:
I certainly try to make allowances for people who are not from English-speaking countries. When I was at the University of North Carolina, we had a lot of Asian and Oriental folks. I made a point of trying to understand what they meant, as opposed to what they were saying. It's good exercise for the brain. Besides, it's the polite thing to do.
I speak (or at least I learned in school) some French. I have since picked up a smattering of Spanish and Italian, and a few words in German and Russian.
I hope that I am never called upon to express myself in any of those languages, especially on any technical topic such as electronics. I'd probably end up requesting a massage from the milkman's car.
The thing that gets my goat is the lack of basic language skills evidenced by those whose native language <i>is</i> English. People from here (the US), the UK, Canada, Australia, etc. should possess at least rudimentary skills in their native language, yet are often left behind by those who are not from English-speaking countries.
It's pathetic.

  Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2001, 11:54 AM   #13
jlanng is offline jlanng
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Default What about Linn's 'Class V' AV 5125?


Apparently it sounds rather good!

- J
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2001, 12:37 AM   #14
km is offline km
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: dk
Smile digital amps


>I listened to some digital pro amps in the last years (LABGruppen, Sony, etc.)>

what models are you referring to??

class-d amplifiers are allready capable of giving very good sound quality so much of the challenging design work has allready been done

we have seen some pioneering work here in denmark (to my best knowledge lcaudio hasnt done much if any) and we demonstrate high-quality class-d amplifiers on a daily basis...

i think its also worth mentioning spectron class-d amplifiers, they have been around for some years and seem to sound pretty good too.

with the delicate design comprising hf , board layout , ground planes , emc and such it isnt best suited for diy im afraid though.

bye k madsen - cadaudio.dk

  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2001, 12:47 AM   #15
jduncan is offline jduncan  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Send a message via AIM to jduncan
another class "T" amp that apparently seems to sound pretty good is the new Sharp SX-1 (and also the SX-100) ....

Granted, I'm not privy to all the details now but it seems shortsighted to dismiss this technology so...
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2001, 01:23 AM   #16
lohk is offline lohk  Europe
diyAudio Member
lohk's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere in Austria, near the Danube
Dear K Madson,

I obviously also did not want to offend anybody.
I was mentioning from mind only, please do not ask me for special models. I was mentioning Lcaudio, because they have a new Digital amp on their intro page.
And you are right after a short survey I must admit that there are a lot approaches which seem to be technically mature.
But why did this approach not hit the market yet ?
Would it not be nice to have cool amplifiers (in both sense) with 100W in matchbox size ?

But, hey, why do I not remember the specific types first ? Was it because ...
No, they sounded quite OK.

Recently I listened to a relativly new digital amp SM-SX1 from Sharp (?) with a Sharp DX-SX1 SACD player and Wilson Audio Puppy/Watt loudspeakers (with expensive cables to be sure) - and yes, it sounded great !
I also listend to a system with big horn loudspeakers (from Advantgarde Acoustic) together with a digital amp (from TacT ?). The combination was not bad either, the importer told me that this amp likes the horn loudspeaker or vice versa. I can assure you, that I did expect that at least.

But after listening to many different amps - at a hifi show for Example - I always resume what I have heard and the classD amps never left a big mark in my memory.
Sorry, probably I am internally biased against these amps, I cannot help myself.
Maybe it is also because digital amps allow only a small amount of DIY approach ?

Can you please highlight the forum about your experiences and give (commercial and non-commercial) hints where to start ?
Do you develop the PWM Audio Technology ? Where can I listen to it ?

  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2001, 04:24 AM   #17
arnach is offline arnach  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Send a message via AIM to arnach
Default Spectron

I think many would disagree with Spectron/(Spectral?) amps sounding pretty good. In my limited experience, they've sounded terrible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2001, 11:11 PM   #18
lohk is offline lohk  Europe
diyAudio Member
lohk's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Somewhere in Austria, near the Danube
You have to be correct here, Arnach, and not mixing "apples and pears":

Spectral: is a already "classical" company making good solid state amplifiers. Trademark is the wide bandwidth (MHz !).
No digital amps, as far as I know.
Look at http://www.spectralaudio.com/

Spectron: They produce very sofisticated professional digital amps, producing 1kW in 19inch/2HU or so.
Look at http://www.spectronav.com/

I, however, must admit, that I do not like both brands too much. First one is somehow to "civilized" (clear, neutral, but a bit boring).
Second one cannot be considered as Hifi sound, at least the amp I have heard, I think it was the D1. But I only once attended a very dreadful demo. Maybe it was not the fault of the amp alone, but I had to go away quick. That maybe of no evidence, because I listened to very bad demos with approved good items (audionote and snell).
And many people consider this amps as the best digital amps available and rate them high.
I am not a believer yet, I am waiting for the first demo, which shows that this amps really like music more than watts...

But to provide lots of power with high efficiency is a viable task, so this amps fill a gap. Pop concerts tend to get louder every year...
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2001, 04:17 AM   #19
Kilowatt is offline Kilowatt  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Harlowton, MT, USA
Here's what I think about it all: I prefer the old class A, AB, and B(not so much B, they sould terrible). It would be a real shame if anyone came out with a digital amp so good that class AB amps started to become less popular. However, I think class T is very interesting, but most class D amps SUCK! BADLY! I think we should be open-minded to class T digital amps, and other good new technology that they may come up with. Many people swear up and down that tube amps sound better than solid state. I couldn't tell for sure, haven't heard enough tube amps. There will always be those that think the same about class AB as opposed to true digital. As far as CD players go, they don't have the full voltage swing that D's and T's have, so they're close enough to analog for me. Why do think they call part of the system a digital-to-ANALOG converter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2001, 02:13 PM   #20
HaaiFaai is offline HaaiFaai
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001

KiloWatt, in a digital amplifier there's also the part which converts the pwm signal into analogue, and it's not about which amplifier sounds good or better, it's the challenge to use another technology (and yes indeed class D is also quite old)
Btw, can you here the difference between a well designed PWM amplifier and a class AB ?
Also the demands on professional amplification it is not just about power, also about quality..
Anyway enjoy listening to whatever amplifier pleases you.

  Reply With Quote


Class D,T or whatever (pwm amplifiers)Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Car Amplifiers Class D anselhu Car Audio 2 9th May 2009 04:59 PM
Learning 'Class D' amplifiers inventor Class D 0 24th August 2008 10:40 AM
TAFN class d amplifiers Michael-Rifa Vendor's Bazaar 2 16th December 2007 12:58 PM
Class D amplifiers and ESL's jmateus Planars & Exotics 19 22nd January 2006 08:51 PM
2 class A SE amplifiers: need suggestion! claudio Solid State 14 25th March 2002 10:47 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio