Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170
Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th April 2008, 06:44 PM   #1
leadbelly is online now leadbelly  Canada
diyAudio Member
leadbelly's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170
Default Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170

I don'y really know a whole lot about discrete SS, so here's my question.

I'm looking at building a Pacific phono preamp (schematic attached).

I have both SK170's and SK389's on hand to build it. If I were to sub SK389's into the circuit, would thermal coupling provide more benefits if (a) each SK389 were split across the stereo channels, or (b) each SK389 were split across the 2 stages of a single channel? Or is it not a good idea?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pacificriaa-1.jpg (36.7 KB, 264 views)
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. Bertrand Russell
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2008, 07:39 PM   #2
mlloyd1 is offline mlloyd1  United States
diyAudio Member
mlloyd1's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Iliinois
Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170
in my humble opinion, this circuit would not take advantages of the matched characteristics and thermal tracking capabilities of the 2sk389 dual jfet in either of your suggested scenarios. save your 2sk389 parts for a more beneficial application; use the 2sk170 and be happy.

  Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2008, 08:22 PM   #3
satoru is offline satoru  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berkeley, California
Hi leadbelly,

I don't think you want your input and output stage JFETs to be thermally coupled, nor left and right channels. So, better off with 2SK170. More important to pick one with Idss ~ 5mA (that sets the voltage on JFET) that sets the voltage here and there. Good luck!

  Reply With Quote


Subbing 2SK389 for 2SK170Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Group Buy: Linear Systems LSK389 / LSK170 JFETs (i.e. Toshiba 2sk389/2sk170 subs) luvdunhill Group Buys 371 10th March 2017 04:40 PM
SMT replacment for 2SK170/2SK389 AudioAngel Parts 3 18th April 2014 08:28 AM
Building ONO - looking for 2SK170 & 2SK389 skseah Pass Labs 34 7th February 2005 11:19 PM
2sk389, 2sk170, 2sj74 in Europe? patriz Parts 16 6th December 2002 01:28 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio