|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
|
I've heard a lot of things about negative feedback but I don't understand how you can reduce noise more than you can reduce the signal. If you inject part of the output into the input again, you are reducing the noise, but at the same time, the signal. So when you crank the signal back up, isn't the noise there too? Where exactly does the noise come from?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
You will of course not reduce any noise that is fed to the input of your circuit.
What your feedback circuit actually does is reducing noise and distortion of the stages that are INSIDE of the loop. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
|
Does NFB solve the problem of non linear output due to unregulated rails that sag when you draw a lot of power from them?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Florida
|
Yes - to the extent that it can. If the voltage drops so low that linear operation cannot be maintained, then feedback will lose the battle.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
|
For this amplifier I tried to build, I had an NPN/PNP pair with emitters grounded (first stage). The first stage NPN's collector was tied to the secondary stage's PNP's base whose emitter was on the + rail. The opposite was true for the negative rail. In other words, both stages were common emitter (inverting). The first stage was common to ground, the second stage, one the NPN was common to the - rail and the PNP was common to the + rail. Both stages combined formed a non-inverting amplifier, so how could I use NFB in a situation like this? How could I get global NFB without using op-amps?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You could put a NFB loop from the emitter of the last stage to the base of the input stage, but it is not strictly global.
To use global NFB you need another inverting stage, which is easy: base to collector of last stage, and give it equal emitter and collector resistors, so its gain is 1, but the collector has the inverted signal. That can be fed back to the input. Jan Didden |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Feedback can't handle noise, sorry. Hasn't Texas got a large document, very wellwritten about feedback? Can't find it right now but here are lot's of info. http://dspvillage.ti.com/docs/catalo...applicationId=
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
|
Snake,
Another way is to put a resistor from input emitters node to ground, then a feedback resistor for output to the emitters node. Bam |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Jan Didden |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You know, despite the >40dB (probably 60) NFB in my SS stereo (Onkyo TX-2500), it is still incredibly noisy (part of why I don't use it). Makes me wonder........
Tim |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Negative Feedback? | Binaural | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 12th March 2009 07:05 PM |
| Negative Feedback | AmpBuilder225 | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 20th February 2009 08:05 PM |
| Less Negative Feedback Is Better? | CarlosT | Chip Amps | 25 | 14th December 2006 10:18 PM |
| Negative Feedback | Jack Thomas | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 5th May 2003 12:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13704 seconds (69.43% PHP - 30.57% MySQL) with 10 queries |