|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Just "ISC made" power transistors,not counterfeit "Sanken".Nothing to
worry about,just they can't be push hard,still usable for normal power applications. |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa Canada
|
Quote:
Well, Eva, I am not in the components sales business. The smallest "component" you can buy from me right now is an Digital RA90 disk drive for about $50 or a PDP-11/83 CPU card for about the same because ancient computer spares is part of my computer consulting business. Just so we're clear here. I *am* an electronics engineer and have been since the 1960s but got into computers as my business in 1976. Whilst I have considered selling components for hobbyists, I have no interest in getting into the sales of Japanese type (2S etc) semiconductors for the very reason that you are all experiencing with either low quality components or outright counterfeit useless components. What I would want to source are name brands of a standard range of N. American and European transistors. There's enough fakery in these but I would only buy production types. So please be careful in tossing around comments like you did. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Germany
|
Quote:
In the pdf download file, the 2SC2922 is in the list with following data: ISC 2SC2922 Pc(W) : 200 Ic : 17 Vceo : 180 Vcbo : 180 Vebo : 5 Hfe by Vce(V)=4 Ic(A)=8 : 50- Vce(sat) by Ic(A)=8 Ib(A)=0.8 max : 2 Ft(Mhz) : 50 Sanken 2SC2922 has the same data, when i look right, only the Hfe begins smaller by 30- and then higher. Quote:
Frist : Sanken : http://www.sanken-ele.co.jp/ and then : ISCSemi : http://www.iscsemi.cn/ Mospec : http://www.mospec.com.tw/ WingShing : http://www.wingshing.com/en/ All produce this transistors in mt-200, only mospec produce it in top3. but when you google about the other Company´s you dont find any infos about this and 2S transistors. Has here any other infos about this companys and use one of the transistor from one of these companys ? i hope that my 2SC are ok and hold what the datasheet says. In future i will only buy original Sanken by a official distributors here in germany. Knows everyone a official distributors for sanken in germany ? Is Schuro a official distributors for sanken in germany ? http://www.schuro.de/preisl-jap-trans.htm Dirk |
||
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I stumble at MOSPEC parts from time to time and quality seems reasonable, at least I think that their manufacturing process is better than the white silicone stuff... If they weren't able to clone the MT-200, the TO-3P seems like the right choice because the heat spreader is thicker and more effective than the flat and thin one used in the fake MT-200.
The transistors from KEC that I have seen also seemed to be of good quality (at least their old TIP35C and TIP36C were very rugged) http://www.keccorp.com/ Korean companies seem to be far more honest than Chinese ones. Please accept my apologies, sbrook. Fakes get me angry because I like to use the full capabilities of transistors and ICs. For example, once I built a quick amplifier prototype with +/-80V rails and two pairs of genuine 2SC3264/2SA1295 and it was able to drive 4 ohms without failing (was it the heavy copper heat spreader?). I can't agree with anybody stating that fake parts are useable, as there are plenty of genuine lower power parts capable of doing the same job, even for *less* money. By buying and accepting fakes you are giving profit to the wrong people and encouraging them to produce more and more fakes. We must stop this process by proving to component dealers that they can't successfully sell us anything but high quality stuff (so that they stop buying junk from obscure sources).
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
I jsut want to say that I replaced suspected fake Toshiba 2sc5200 for ISC 5200 and complimentary, and the sound change was an improvement in my opinion. Also I have driven the amp to about its dynamic max for 12 hours over newyears...
Sadly many of us have to choose between the devils we know becasue of lacking distrubution setup of the main manufactures.... For the transistor I mentioned, I need to buy 100 at more than digikey single cost from the local authorised distributor... |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South West Germany
|
Hi Dirk, Eva,
I agree, we should never accept fake parts and should without any excuse legally attack their sellers. On the other hand, the devices in question are general purpose power devices. The audio market compared to general purpose application is very small. The Sanken have got a good reputation in the audio market, but still the main volume is produced for general purpose for which the audio quality - which by the way can not be measured - isn't relevant. As I have mentioned in my previous post, any manufacturer who has been registered and accepted at JEDEC as manufacturer of such devices can produce it as long they are in line with the registered specifications. In addition for audio power application the hfe variation spec is important. If the variation is much lager than from the original device, matching transitor pairs is unavoidable. My personal experience with devices from second source manufacturer show larger hfe variation, which make them finally more expensive if you need to buy more and select acceptable pairs. If people intent to use devices produced from other suppliers than from Sanken as it is here the case, must keep in mind that there can be some sound deviations as previously mentioned. As long as the manufacturer don't use the Sanken trade name it is a normal and legal proceeding. For audio application I would anyway recommend to use only the original proposed device type for which the circuit has been developed. Dirk, I have also checked the iscsemi product list and couldn't find the page with the 2SC2922. But I have send them an e-mail with my request for such a device. Let's wait for their answer. At this moment I don't know any official Sanken Distributor in Germany, but I will find out over the Sanken sales department. Schuro isn't an official distributor only a dealer. If Schuro propose original Sanken devices, according to German roules, Schuro will be made responsible for the origin of their products - again if "Japanese product" has been mentioned, Japanese must be in - in your case Sanken. Cheers Gerd |
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in Germany
|
Quote:
Quote:
I wonder once what ISCSemi says. i dont get a answer after my second question and send them the picture of the dirty rag. When the 2SC2922 is a original ISCSemi that hold the spec, thats ok for me (the ISC cost a half of Sanken) but when its not ok, its a fake of ISC or other and my Amps burn out, then i become a big neck. But at begin next month i have birthday and then i will buy original Sanken !!! But you have right. ISC are Chinese and not Japan, how it is in the list at reichelt! Dirk |
||
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa Canada
|
Quote:
[QUOTE[Fakes get me angry because I like to use the full capabilities of transistors and ICs. For example, once I built a quick amplifier prototype with +/-80V rails and two pairs of genuine 2SC3264/2SA1295 and it was able to drive 4 ohms without failing (was it the heavy copper heat spreader?). I can't agree with anybody stating that fake parts are useable, as there are plenty of genuine lower power parts capable of doing the same job, even for *less* money. By buying and accepting fakes you are giving profit to the wrong people and encouraging them to produce more and more fakes. We must stop this process by proving to component dealers that they can't successfully sell us anything but high quality stuff (so that they stop buying junk from obscure sources). [/B][/QUOTE] I can understand what you're saying, but at the same time there are copies (made by other companies but cheaper) and there are fakes (made by rogue outfits and are not in any way what is being sold. In most industries, copies of things are made "under license" because of copyright type issues. In the semiconductor industry, unless a part uses unique technical patented construction methods, licensing is often not needed, or they're made in places where licensing is not required. Many copies are made with subtly different parameters. Fakes or counterfeits are a different matter altogether. They are intended to sell what appears to be a brand name product but is nothing of the sort ... not even close. ISC do copies and not necessarily particularly good quality copies at that. If you buy a "copy" and know you're getting a copy (as opposed to a transistor made by the original manufacturer like in this case, Sanken) then you should be accepting the fact that you're not getting the top quality, but you should be getting something close. It's kind of like the generic drug industry. There are companies that make patented drugs "under license" and there are those who make copies of out of patent protection drugs we call generics, both of which are copies. I take a medication that is quite inexpensive as a generic, but about 1/3 to 1/2 the cost of the original brand name manufacturer, and the generic works, but there are differences. The generic has a different release rate to the brand name and different release rate between batches. It works but the overall effectiveness of the medication is not as good as the brand name. BUT I can't afford the brand name because I don't have a drug plan, so I use the generics which provide me with adequate relief from my condition. As was mentioned by someone else, if someone wanted to do fakes of these transistors, it would make no sense to do a fake of an ISC, nor would it make sense to put in 36 sq mm dies, when standard practice is to put in a small signal transistor die and label it with the brand name (Sanken). So, my point is that these are probably copies and not fakes. It may be a reasonable, or it may be a poor copy - testing is the only way to know. The question is what did the OP buy? Did he think he was getting Sanken Japanese transistors? If so, then he was ripped off and should absolutely return them. Did he know he was getting ISC transistors? If so, he probably got what he paid for, and the only way to make sure is to thouroughly test them. If they test out to a reasonable tolerance of the ISC part specs, then he's got what he ordered - maybe not what he was hoping for - but probably didn't realize the ISC copy was not going to be as good as the Sanken original. If on the other hand the test of these shows them to be outside tolerance of the specs of the device, then he should return them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Of course, there are good copies and bad copies. For example, Fairchild is producing KSC5200 and KSA1943 with similar quality to Toshiba original parts.
The point is that MT-200 transistors by definition have a big copper thermal pad soldered on top of the back plate (see pictures) and any good copy must include this thermal pad because it's required to achieve rated power handling and SOA. The copies made by ISC don't include it, instead, the bare die is attached to a thin bottom plate resulting in TO-220-like power handling.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coimbra
|
Quote:
__________________
Yo no creo en brujas pero que las hay... las hay (Cervantes) |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Marantz 2600 Receiver...counterfeit (or remarked) transistors? | EchoWars | Solid State | 2 | 29th May 2007 09:59 PM |
| Are these transistors counterfeit? | geaugafletcher | Parts | 4 | 18th January 2007 04:36 PM |
| Counterfeit? | Amblifier | Solid State | 10 | 24th September 2005 07:07 PM |
| Counterfeit transistors??? | peter5 | Solid State | 1 | 20th February 2002 08:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.17591 seconds (86.82% PHP - 13.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |